• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Machine Learning To Stratify Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Risk among Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.机器学习对社区获得性肺炎住院患者中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌风险的分层作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Jan 24;67(1):e0102322. doi: 10.1128/aac.01023-22. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
2
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization is a poor predictor of intensive care unit-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections requiring antibiotic treatment.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔定植是重症监护病房获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染需要抗生素治疗的不良预测指标。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Oct;38(10):1991-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181eeda3f.
3
Using Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Screens to Rule Out Methicillin-Resistant S aureus Pneumonia in Surgical Intensive Care Units.使用耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔筛查来排除外科重症监护病房中的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎。
J Surg Res. 2023 Dec;292:317-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.07.053. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
4
Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation or infection in intensive care units and their reliability for predicting MRSA on ICU admission.重症监护病房耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌定植或感染的危险因素及其对预测重症监护病房入院时耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的可靠性。
Infez Med. 2016 Sep 1;24(3):201-9.
5
Incidence of drug-resistant pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia at a safety net hospital.安全网医院社区获得性肺炎中耐药病原体的发生率。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Aug 6;12(8):e0079224. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00792-24. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
6
Empiric therapy directed against MRSA in patients admitted to the intensive care unit does not improve outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia.经验性治疗针对重症监护病房中收治的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)患者,并不能改善社区获得性肺炎的结局。
Infection. 2013 Apr;41(2):517-23. doi: 10.1007/s15010-012-0363-1. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
7
Comparison of community-acquired pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus producing the Panton-Valentine leukocidin.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌所致社区获得性肺炎的比较。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009 Dec;13(12):1476-85.
8
Predicting antibiotic resistance to community-acquired pneumonia antibiotics in culture-positive patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia.预测培养阳性的医源性肺炎患者对抗社区获得性肺炎抗生素的耐药性。
J Hosp Med. 2012 Mar;7(3):195-202. doi: 10.1002/jhm.942. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
9
Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia in a children's hospital. Our ten-year experience.儿童医院获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎。我们十年的经验。
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2021 Feb;119(1):11-17. doi: 10.5546/aap.2021.eng.11.
10
Clinical predictors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in nosocomial and healthcare-associated pneumonia: a multicenter, matched case-control study.医院获得性和医疗保健相关性肺炎中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的临床预测因子:一项多中心、匹配病例对照研究。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Jan;37(1):51-56. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3100-y. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The application of machine learning in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases.机器学习在临床微生物学和传染病中的应用。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 May 1;15:1545646. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1545646. eCollection 2025.
2
Artificial Intelligence in Bacterial Infections Control: A Scoping Review.人工智能在细菌感染控制中的应用:一项范围综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Mar 2;14(3):256. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14030256.
3
Risk factors for drug-resistant pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysis.社区获得性肺炎中耐药病原体的危险因素:系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Respir Rev. 2025 Mar 19;34(175). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0183-2024. Print 2025 Jan.
4
Artificial intelligence applications in the diagnosis and treatment of bacterial infections.人工智能在细菌感染诊断与治疗中的应用。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Aug 6;15:1449844. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1449844. eCollection 2024.
5
Improving Risk Prediction of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Using Machine Learning Methods With Network Features: Retrospective Development Study.使用具有网络特征的机器学习方法改善耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的风险预测:回顾性开发研究
JMIR AI. 2024 May 16;3:e48067. doi: 10.2196/48067.
6
Deep learning model for personalized prediction of positive MRSA culture using time-series electronic health records.基于时间序列电子健康记录的个性化预测阳性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌培养的深度学习模型。
Nat Commun. 2024 Mar 6;15(1):2036. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46211-0.
7
Individual meropenem epithelial lining fluid and plasma PK/PD target attainment.美罗培南上皮细胞衬液和血浆 PK/PD 目标达成的个体差异。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Dec 14;67(12):e0072723. doi: 10.1128/aac.00727-23. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
8
[Antibiotic treatment of community-acquired and hospital-acquired pneumonia].[社区获得性肺炎和医院获得性肺炎的抗生素治疗]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2023 Sep;118(6):454-463. doi: 10.1007/s00063-023-01033-8. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Characterizing Risk Factors for Clostridioides difficile Infection among Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.分析社区获得性肺炎住院患者中艰难梭菌感染的危险因素。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Jun 17;65(7):e0041721. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00417-21.
2
Empirical Anti-MRSA vs Standard Antibiotic Therapy and Risk of 30-Day Mortality in Patients Hospitalized for Pneumonia.经验性抗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)治疗与肺炎住院患者 30 天死亡率的关系。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;180(4):552-560. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.7495.
3
Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America.成人社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗。美国胸科学会和美国传染病学会的官方临床实践指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):e45-e67. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST.
4
The association of prior hospitalization with clinical outcomes among patients admitted with pneumonia: a propensity score matching study.既往住院与肺炎患者住院临床结局的相关性:倾向评分匹配研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 27;19(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3961-z.
5
Rapid Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in BAL: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.BAL 中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的快速检测:一项初步随机对照试验。
Chest. 2019 May;155(5):999-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
6
A Therapeutic Strategy for All Pneumonia Patients: A 3-Year Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study Using Risk Factors for Multidrug-resistant Pathogens to Select Initial Empiric Therapy.一种适用于所有肺炎患者的治疗策略:使用多重耐药病原体危险因素选择初始经验性治疗的 3 年前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 19;68(7):1080-1088. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy631.
7
Duration of Antibiotic Use Among Adults With Uncomplicated Community-Acquired Pneumonia Requiring Hospitalization in the United States.美国需要住院治疗的成人社区获得性单纯性肺炎抗生素使用时间。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 17;66(9):1333-1341. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix986.
8
Impact of antibiotic therapy in severe community-acquired pneumonia: Data from the Infauci study.抗生素治疗对重症社区获得性肺炎的影响:来自 Infauci 研究的数据。
J Crit Care. 2018 Feb;43:183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.048. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
9
Antibiotic Prescribing for Adults Hospitalized in the Etiology of Pneumonia in the Community Study.社区肺炎病因研究中成年住院患者的抗生素处方
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 20;4(2):ofx088. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx088. eCollection 2017 Spring.
10
Staphylococcus aureus Community-acquired Pneumonia: Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes.金黄色葡萄球菌社区获得性肺炎:患病率、临床特征及转归
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 1;63(3):300-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw300. Epub 2016 May 8.

机器学习对社区获得性肺炎住院患者中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌风险的分层作用。

Machine Learning To Stratify Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Risk among Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University, Chicago College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, Illinois, USA.

Pharmacometrics Center of Excellence, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Jan 24;67(1):e0102322. doi: 10.1128/aac.01023-22. Epub 2022 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1128/aac.01023-22
PMID:36472425
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9872682/
Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an uncommon but serious cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A lack of validated MRSA CAP risk factors can result in overuse of empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics. We sought to develop robust models predicting the risk of MRSA CAP using machine learning using a population-based sample of hospitalized patients with CAP admitted to either a tertiary academic center or a community teaching hospital. Data were evaluated using a machine learning approach. Cases were CAP patients with MRSA isolated from blood or respiratory cultures within 72 h of admission; controls did not have MRSA CAP. The Classification Tree Analysis algorithm was used for model development. Model predictions were evaluated in sensitivity analyses. A total of 21 of 1,823 patients (1.2%) developed MRSA within 72 h of admission. MRSA risk was higher among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in the first 24 h who required mechanical ventilation than among ICU patients who did not require ventilatory support (odds ratio [OR], 8.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4 to 32). MRSA risk was lower among patients admitted to ward units than among those admitted to the ICU (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.56) and lower among ICU patients without a history of antibiotic use in the last 90 days than among ICU patients with antibiotic use in the last 90 days (OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.002 to 0.59). The final machine learning model was highly accurate (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] area = 0.775) in training and jackknife validity analyses. We identified a relatively simple machine learning model that predicted MRSA risk in hospitalized patients with CAP within 72 h postadmission.

摘要

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的罕见但严重的病因。由于缺乏经过验证的 MRSA CAP 风险因素,可能会导致经验性广谱抗生素的过度使用。我们试图使用基于人群的 CAP 住院患者样本,使用机器学习为 CAP 患者开发预测 MRSA CAP 风险的稳健模型,这些患者被收入三级学术中心或社区教学医院。使用机器学习方法评估数据。病例为入院后 72 小时内从血液或呼吸道培养物中分离出 MRSA 的 CAP 患者;对照组未发生 MRSA CAP。使用分类树分析算法进行模型开发。在敏感性分析中评估模型预测。在入院后 72 小时内,共有 1823 名患者中的 21 名(1.2%)发生了 MRSA。与不需要通气支持的 ICU 患者相比,在入院 24 小时内入住 ICU 且需要机械通气的患者中,MRSA 的风险更高(比值比[OR],8.3;95%置信区间[CI],2.4 至 32)。与入住 ICU 的患者相比,入住病房的患者发生 MRSA 的风险较低(OR,0.21;95%CI,0.07 至 0.56);与在过去 90 天内使用过抗生素的 ICU 患者相比,在过去 90 天内未使用抗生素的 ICU 患者的风险较低(OR,0.03;95%CI,0.002 至 0.59)。最终的机器学习模型在训练和 jackknife 有效性分析中具有很高的准确性(接收者操作特征[ROC]面积=0.775)。我们确定了一种相对简单的机器学习模型,可预测入院后 72 小时内 CAP 住院患者的 MRSA 风险。