Department of English, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
mSphere. 2022 Dec 21;7(6):e0054722. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00547-22. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
Biological complexity is widely seen as the central, intractable challenge of engineering biology. Yet this challenge has been constructed through the field's dominant metaphors. Alternative ways of thinking-latent in progressive experimental approaches, but rarely articulated as such-could instead position complexity as engineering biology's greatest resource. We outline how assumptions about engineered microorganisms have been built into the field, carried by entrenched metaphors, even as contemporary methods move beyond them. We suggest that alternative metaphors would better align engineering biology's conceptual infrastructure with the field's move away from conventionally engineering-inspired methods toward biology-centric ones. Innovating new conceptual frameworks would also enable better aligning scientific work with higher-level conversations about that work. Such innovation-thinking about how engineering microbes might be more like user-centered design than like programming a computer or building a car-could highlight complexity as a resource to leverage, not a problem to erase or negate.
生物复杂性被广泛认为是工程生物学的核心难题。然而,这一挑战是通过该领域的主导隐喻构建的。替代性的思维方式——潜伏在渐进式实验方法中,但很少被明确表达——可以将复杂性定位为工程生物学最大的资源。我们概述了工程微生物的假设是如何通过根深蒂固的隐喻构建到该领域的,即使当代方法超越了这些隐喻。我们认为,替代性的隐喻将更好地使工程生物学的概念基础与该领域从传统上受工程启发的方法向以生物学为中心的方法的转变保持一致。创新的新概念框架也将能够更好地使科学工作与关于该工作的更高层次的对话保持一致。这种创新思维——思考工程微生物可能更像是以用户为中心的设计,而不是像编程计算机或制造汽车——可以将复杂性作为一种资源来利用,而不是作为一个需要消除或否定的问题。