Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Research Division, New Brunswick NJ.
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Jan;19(1):e92-e102. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00295. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
Primary care factors related to Medicaid enrollees' receipt of guideline concordant cancer treatment is understudied; however, team structure and processes likely affect care disparities. We explore Medicaid-serving primary care teams functioning within multiteam systems to understand performance variations in quality of breast and colorectal cancer care.
We conducted a comparative case study, using critical case sampling of primary care clinics in New Jersey, to provide maximum variation on clinic-level care performance rates (Medicaid enrollees' receipt of guideline-concordant treatment). Site evaluations, conducted from 2019 to 2020, included observation (2-3 days) and interviews. Using a multistep analytic process, we explored contextual factors within primary care that may contribute to cancer care performance variations.
We identified performance variations stemming from adaptations of multiteam system inputs and processes on the basis of contextual factors (ie, business model, clinic culture). Team 1 (average performer), part of a multisite safety-net clinic system, mainly teamed outside their organization, relying on designated roles, protocol-based care, and quality improvement informed by within-team metrics. Team 2 (high performer), part of a for-profit health system, remained mission-driven to improve urban health, teamed exclusively with internal teams through electronically enabled information exchange and health system-wide quality improvement efforts. Team 3 (low performer), a physician-owned private practice with minimal teaming, accepted Medicaid enrollees to diversify their payer mix and relied on referral-based care with limited consideration of social barriers.
Primary care team structures and processes variations may (in part) explain performance variations. Future research aiming to improve care quality for Medicaid populations should consider primary care teams' capacity and context in relation to composite teams to support care quality improvements in subsequent prospective trials.
与医疗补助参保者接受指南一致的癌症治疗相关的初级保健因素研究较少;然而,团队结构和流程可能会影响护理差异。我们探索了在多团队系统中运作的 Medicaid 服务初级保健团队,以了解乳腺癌和结直肠癌护理质量的绩效差异。
我们进行了一项比较案例研究,对新泽西州的初级保健诊所进行了关键案例抽样,以在诊所层面的护理绩效率(医疗补助参保者接受指南一致的治疗)上获得最大变化。2019 年至 2020 年进行的现场评估包括观察(2-3 天)和访谈。我们使用多步骤分析过程,探索初级保健中可能导致癌症护理绩效差异的背景因素。
我们确定了绩效差异,这些差异源于多团队系统投入和流程的适应,其基础是背景因素(即商业模式、诊所文化)。团队 1(平均表现者)是多地点社区诊所系统的一部分,主要在组织外组队,依靠指定的角色、基于协议的护理以及通过团队内部指标提供的质量改进信息。团队 2(高绩效者)是营利性医疗系统的一部分,仍然致力于改善城市健康,通过电子信息交换和全系统质量改进努力,与内部团队完全组队。团队 3(低绩效者)是一家医生所有的私人诊所,团队合作很少,接受医疗补助参保者来多样化其支付人组合,依赖于基于转诊的护理,很少考虑社会障碍。
初级保健团队结构和流程的变化可能(部分)解释了绩效差异。未来旨在提高医疗补助人群护理质量的研究应考虑初级保健团队的能力和背景与复合团队的关系,以支持后续前瞻性试验中的护理质量改进。