Suppr超能文献

一种用于测量马全血胰岛素浓度的即时侧向流动检测的验证和方法比较。

Validation and method comparison for a point-of-care lateral flow assay measuring equine whole blood insulin concentrations.

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.

Fortis Life Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Vet Diagn Invest. 2023 Mar;35(2):124-131. doi: 10.1177/10406387221142288. Epub 2022 Dec 8.

Abstract

The Wellness Ready Test (WRT) is a lateral flow, stall-side assay that measures equine insulin in whole blood and requires validation before recommending clinical use. We evaluated intra- and inter-assay precision and linearity and compared the WRT with a radioimmunoassay (RIA). Tested concentrations ranged from <139 to >695 pmol/L (<20 to >100 μIU/mL). For 20 replicates at each insulin level, intra-assay CVs of the WRT for insulin were 13.3%, 12.9%, and 15.3% at low (139-278 pmol/L; 20-40 μIU/mL), intermediate (278-417 pmol/L; 40-60 μIU/mL), and high (>417  >60 μIU/mL) concentrations, respectively. For 10 replicates at each level (3 assay lots), inter-assay CVs were 15.9%, 11.0%, and 11.7%, respectively. In the weighted linear regression of 5 measured insulin concentrations against expected concentrations,  = 0.98, slope = 1.02, and y-intercept = 14.4 pmol/L (2.08 μIU/mL). The Spearman correlation coefficient () was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.94) between the WRT and RIA; the WRT = f(RIA) Passing-Bablok regression yielded the fit, y = 1.005x + 24.3 pmol/L (3.50 μIU/mL). The WRT result averaged 10.4% higher than the RIA result, with targeted bias of 25.9, 26.1, and 26.7 pmol/L (3.74, 3.76, and 3.84 μIU/mL) for cutoffs used to diagnose insulin dysregulation of 312, 347, and 451 pmol/L (45, 50, and 65 μIU/mL). Assay clinical sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies determined at the 3 selected clinical cutoffs and using the RIA as gold standard were 87-95%, 92-96%, and 91-95%, respectively ( = 99 samples). Observed total error was 28.4-30.4%. The WRT had acceptable precision, excellent linearity, and good association with the RIA.

摘要

健康准备测试(WRT)是一种侧向流动的即时检测,可测量全血中的马胰岛素,在推荐临床使用之前需要进行验证。我们评估了该方法的批内和批间精密度和线性,并将其与放射免疫测定(RIA)进行了比较。测试浓度范围为 <139 至 >695 pmol/L(<20 至 >100 μIU/mL)。对于每个胰岛素水平的 20 个重复,WRT 的批内 CV 分别为 13.3%、12.9%和 15.3%,在低浓度(139-278 pmol/L;20-40 μIU/mL)、中浓度(278-417 pmol/L;40-60 μIU/mL)和高浓度(>417 >60 μIU/mL)。对于每个水平(3 个检测批次)的 10 个重复,批间 CV 分别为 15.9%、11.0%和 11.7%。在对 5 个测量胰岛素浓度与预期浓度的加权线性回归中,r = 0.98,斜率 = 1.02,y 截距 = 14.4 pmol/L(2.08 μIU/mL)。WRT 与 RIA 之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数()为 0.90(95%CI:0.85-0.94);WRT = f(RIA)的 Passing-Bablok 回归得出拟合线,y = 1.005x + 24.3 pmol/L(3.50 μIU/mL)。WRT 的结果比 RIA 的结果平均高 10.4%,在用于诊断胰岛素失调的 312、347 和 451 pmol/L(45、50 和 65 μIU/mL)的切点处,目标偏差分别为 25.9、26.1 和 26.7 pmol/L(3.74、3.76 和 3.84 μIU/mL)。使用 RIA 作为金标准,在 3 个选定的临床切点处确定的检测灵敏度、特异性和准确度分别为 87-95%、92-96%和 91-95%(n = 99)。观察到的总误差为 28.4-30.4%。WRT 具有可接受的精密度、优异的线性和与 RIA 的良好相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc1c/9999392/5954aef2323f/10.1177_10406387221142288-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验