Suppr超能文献

一种用于马匹血清淀粉样蛋白A的新型即时检验法的分析验证

Analytical validation of a new point-of-care assay for serum amyloid A in horses.

作者信息

Schwartz D, Pusterla N, Jacobsen S, Christopher M M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, Davis, California, USA.

Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California, Davis, California, USA.

出版信息

Equine Vet J. 2018 Sep;50(5):678-683. doi: 10.1111/evj.12807. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Serum amyloid A (SAA) is a major acute phase protein in horses. A new point-of-care (POC) test for SAA (Stablelab) is available, but studies evaluating its analytical accuracy are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the analytical performance of the SAA POC test by 1) determining linearity and precision, 2) comparing results in whole blood with those in serum or plasma, and 3) comparing POC results with those obtained using a previously validated turbidimetric immunoassay (TIA).

STUDY DESIGN

Assay validation.

METHODS

Analytical validation of the POC test was done in accordance with American Society of Veterinary Clinical Pathology guidelines using residual equine serum/plasma and whole blood samples from the Clinical Pathology Laboratory at the University of California-Davis. A TIA was used as the reference method. We also evaluated the effect of haematocrit (HCT).

RESULTS

The POC test was linear for SAA concentrations of up to at least 1000 μg/mL (r = 0.991). Intra-assay CVs were 13, 18 and 15% at high (782 μg/mL), intermediate (116 μg/mL) and low (64 μg/mL) concentrations. Inter-assay (inter-batch) CVs were 45, 14 and 15% at high (1372 μg/mL), intermediate (140 μg/mL) and low (56 μg/mL) concentrations. SAA results in whole blood were significantly lower than those in serum/plasma (P = 0.0002), but were positively correlated (r = 0.908) and not affected by HCT (P = 0.261); proportional negative bias was observed in samples with SAA>500 μg/mL. The difference between methods exceeded the 95% confidence interval of the combined imprecision of both methods (15%).

MAIN LIMITATIONS

Analytical validation could not be performed in whole blood, the sample most likely to be used stall side.

CONCLUSION

The POC test has acceptable accuracy and precision in equine serum/plasma with SAA concentrations of up to at least 1000 μg/mL. Low inter-batch precision at high concentrations may affect serial measurements, and the use of the same test batch and sample type (serum/plasma or whole blood) is recommended. Comparison of results between the POC test and the TIA is not recommended.

摘要

背景

血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)是马体内主要的急性期蛋白。一种新的SAA即时检测(POC)方法(Stablelab)已可用,但缺乏评估其分析准确性的研究。

目的

通过以下方式评估SAA POC检测的分析性能:1)确定线性和精密度;2)比较全血与血清或血浆中的检测结果;3)将POC检测结果与使用先前验证的比浊免疫测定法(TIA)获得的结果进行比较。

研究设计

检测方法验证。

方法

按照美国兽医临床病理学会的指南,使用来自加利福尼亚大学戴维斯分校临床病理实验室的剩余马血清/血浆和全血样本,对POC检测进行分析验证。以TIA作为参考方法。我们还评估了血细胞比容(HCT)的影响。

结果

POC检测对于SAA浓度至少高达1000μg/mL呈线性(r = 0.991)。在高(782μg/mL)、中(116μg/mL)、低(64μg/mL)浓度下,批内变异系数分别为13%、18%和15%。在高(1372μg/mL)、中(140μg/mL)、低(56μg/mL)浓度下,批间变异系数分别为45%、14%和15%。全血中的SAA结果显著低于血清/血浆中的结果(P = 0.0002),但呈正相关(r = 0.908),且不受HCT影响(P = 0.261);在SAA>500μg/mL的样本中观察到比例性负偏差。两种方法之间的差异超过了两种方法合并不精密度的95%置信区间(15%)。

主要局限性

无法在最可能在畜舍旁使用的全血中进行分析验证。

结论

对于SAA浓度至少高达1000μg/mL的马血清/血浆,POC检测具有可接受的准确性和精密度。高浓度下批间精密度较低可能会影响连续测量,建议使用同一检测批次和相同样本类型(血清/血浆或全血)。不建议比较POC检测和TIA的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验