Turjeman Adi, von Dach Elodie, Molina José, Franceschini Erica, Koppel Fidi, Yelin Dana, Dishon-Benattar Yael, Mussini Cristina, Rodríguez-Baño Jesús, Cisneros José Miguel, Huttner Angela, Paul Mical, Leibovici Leonard, Yahav Dafna
Research Authority, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tikva, Israel.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Dec 1;55:101750. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101750. eCollection 2023 Jan.
We aim to compare the effect of short versus long treatment duration in Gram-negative bacteremia on all-cause mortality in pre-specified sub-groups.
Individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short (≤7) versus longer (>7 days) antibiotic treatment for Gram-negative bacteremia. Participants were adults (≥18 years), with Gram-negative bacteremia during hospital stay. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science to identify trials conducted up to May 2022. Primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, relapse of bacteremia, length of hospital stay, readmission, local or distant infection complications, adverse events, and resistance emergence.Outcomes were assessed in pre-specified subgroups: women vs men; non-urinary vs urinary source; presence vs absence of hypotension on initial presentation; immunocompromised patients versus non-immunocompromised patients, and age (above/below 65). Fixed-effect meta-analysis model was used to estimate pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). All three trials had low risk of bias for allocation generation and concealment.
Three RCTs (1186 patients) were included; 1121 with bacteremia. No significant difference in mortality was demonstrated between 7- and 14-days treatment (90-day mortality: OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.73-1.58; 30-day mortality: 1.08, 0.62-1.91). Relapse (1.00, 0.50-1.97); length of hospital stay (P = 0.78); readmission (0.96, 0.80-1.22); and infection complications (local: 1.62 0.76-3.47; distant: 2.00, 0.18-22.08), were without significant difference, and so were adverse events or resistance emergence.No significant difference in clinical outcomes between 7 and 14 days of antibiotics was demonstrated in the subgroups of gender, age, hemodynamic status, immune status, and source of infection.
For patients hemodynamically stable and afebrile at 48 h prior to discontinuation, seven days of antibiotic therapy for bacteremia result in similar outcomes as 14 days, in terms of mortality, relapse, length of hospital stay, complications of infection, resistance emergence, and adverse events. These results apply for any adult age group, gender, source of infection, immune status, and hemodynamic status on presentation.
There was no funding source for this study.
我们旨在比较革兰氏阴性菌血症短期与长期治疗疗程对预先设定亚组中全因死亡率的影响。
对比较革兰氏阴性菌血症短期(≤7天)与长期(>7天)抗生素治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)进行个体参与者数据荟萃分析。参与者为成年人(≥18岁),住院期间发生革兰氏阴性菌血症。我们检索了PubMed、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库和科学网,以识别截至2022年5月开展的试验。主要结局为90天全因死亡率。次要结局为30天死亡率、菌血症复发、住院时间、再入院、局部或远处感染并发症、不良事件和耐药性出现。在预先设定的亚组中评估结局:女性与男性;非泌尿道与泌尿道感染源;初始就诊时有无低血压;免疫功能低下患者与非免疫功能低下患者,以及年龄(65岁以上/以下)。采用固定效应荟萃分析模型估计合并比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。所有三项试验在分配产生和隐藏方面的偏倚风险均较低。
纳入三项RCT(1186例患者);1121例有菌血症。7天和14天治疗之间的死亡率无显著差异(90天死亡率:OR 1.08,95%CI 0.73 - 1.58;30天死亡率:OR 1.08,0.62 - 1.91)。复发率(OR 1.00,0.50 - 1.97);住院时间(P = 0.78);再入院率(OR 0.96,0.80 - 1.22);以及感染并发症(局部:OR 1.62,0.76 - 3.47;远处:OR 2.00,0.18 - 22.08),均无显著差异,不良事件或耐药性出现情况也是如此。在性别、年龄、血流动力学状态、免疫状态和感染源亚组中,7天和14天抗生素治疗的临床结局无显著差异。
对于停药前48小时血流动力学稳定且无发热的患者,就死亡率、复发率、住院时间、感染并发症、耐药性出现和不良事件而言,革兰氏阴性菌血症7天抗生素治疗与14天治疗的结局相似。这些结果适用于任何成年年龄组、性别、感染源、免疫状态和就诊时的血流动力学状态。
本研究无资金来源。