Braig Zachary V, Pradhan Pratik, Tibbo Meagan E, Padua Horacio, Shaughnessy William J, Stans Anthony A, Larson A Noelle, Shore Benjamin J, Milbrandt Todd A
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Child Orthop. 2022 Dec;16(6):512-518. doi: 10.1177/18632521221135191. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
The purpose of this study is to compare pediatric hip aspiration in the operating room under general anesthesia or via bedside aspiration under moderate sedation and delineate the anesthetic time required.
A database query conducted at two academic institutions identified all patients under the age of 17 who underwent hip aspiration between 2000 and 2017. At one institution, aspiration was performed in the operating room under general anesthesia. Patients were kept anesthetized until cell count was complete. At the second institution, aspiration was performed in the emergency room at bedside under sedation. The medical record was reviewed for demographic data, hip aspiration results, diagnoses, treatment, and anesthesia time.
A total of 233 patients (233 hips) with a mean age of 7.2 years were identified. Seventy-five patients underwent aspiration in the operating room, and 158 patients underwent bedside aspiration. Patients with a negative aspiration averaged 87 min under anesthesia when performed in the operating room and 29 min under sedation when performed at bedside. Patients with a negative aspiration performed in the operating room after 5 pm averaged 99 min under anesthesia, and 73 min under anesthesia when performed between 7 am and 5 pm (p < 0.01). Seventy-eight (49%) patients who underwent bedside aspiration did not require operative intervention and therefore avoided general anesthesia.
Pediatric hip aspiration performed in the operating room results in prolonged anesthesia times while synovial fluid is transported and processed. Anesthesia times are significantly longer after 5 pm. Bedside aspiration resulted in significantly less anesthesia exposure, with half of patients undergoing bedside aspiration avoiding general anesthesia altogether.
Level III.
本研究旨在比较在全身麻醉下于手术室进行小儿髋关节穿刺与在中度镇静下经床边穿刺的情况,并确定所需的麻醉时间。
在两家学术机构进行数据库查询,以确定2000年至2017年间所有接受髋关节穿刺的17岁以下患者。在其中一家机构,穿刺在全身麻醉下于手术室进行。患者在细胞计数完成前一直处于麻醉状态。在第二家机构,穿刺在急诊室床边镇静下进行。查阅病历以获取人口统计学数据、髋关节穿刺结果、诊断、治疗及麻醉时间。
共确定了233例患者(233个髋关节),平均年龄7.2岁。75例患者在手术室进行穿刺,158例患者进行床边穿刺。穿刺结果为阴性的患者,在手术室进行穿刺时平均麻醉时间为87分钟,在床边进行穿刺时平均镇静时间为29分钟。下午5点后在手术室进行穿刺结果为阴性的患者平均麻醉时间为99分钟,而在上午7点至下午5点之间进行穿刺时平均麻醉时间为73分钟(p<0.01)。158例进行床边穿刺的患者中有78例(49%)不需要手术干预,因此避免了全身麻醉。
在手术室进行小儿髋关节穿刺会导致在运送和处理滑液时麻醉时间延长。下午5点后麻醉时间明显更长。床边穿刺导致的麻醉暴露明显减少,进行床边穿刺的患者中有一半完全避免了全身麻醉。
三级。