Pacula Rosalie Liccardo, Smart Rosanna
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California 90407; email:
National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:397-419. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045128.
State-level marijuana liberalization policies have been evolving for the past five decades, and yet the overall scientific evidence of the impact of these policies is widely believed to be inconclusive. In this review we summarize some of the key limitations of the studies evaluating the effects of decriminalization and medical marijuana laws on marijuana use, highlighting their inconsistencies in terms of the heterogeneity of policies, the timing of the evaluations, and the measures of use being considered. We suggest that the heterogeneity in the responsiveness of different populations to particular laws is important for interpreting the mixed findings from the literature, and we highlight the limitations of the existing literature in providing clear insights into the probable effects of marijuana legalization.
在过去的五十年里,州级大麻自由化政策一直在不断演变,然而,人们普遍认为,关于这些政策影响的总体科学证据尚无定论。在本综述中,我们总结了评估大麻合法化和医用大麻法律对大麻使用影响的研究的一些关键局限性,强调了它们在政策异质性、评估时间以及所考虑的使用衡量标准方面的不一致性。我们认为,不同人群对特定法律反应的异质性对于解释文献中的混合研究结果很重要,并且我们强调了现有文献在清晰洞察大麻合法化可能产生的影响方面的局限性。