• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

县级经济变化与美国的药物死亡率:大衰退的证据。

County-Level Economic Changes and Drug Mortality in the United States: Evidence from the Great Recession.

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.

School of Social Work, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85008, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 5;19(23):16261. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316261.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192316261
PMID:36498334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9737402/
Abstract

We aimed at examining whether county-level economic changes were associated with changes in county-level drug mortality rates since the Great Recession and whether the association is equally distributed across major sociodemographic subgroups. Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (2004-2019), combined with census data, we conducted fixed effects analyses by including county-level economic changes as primary exposures and county-level drug-related mortality rates (per 100,000 people) from 2004-2007 (i.e., prior to the recession) to 2008-2011, 2012-2015, and 2016-2019 as an outcome variable based on 1833 counties. Our findings showed that drug mortality rates increased from 13.9 (2004-2007) to 16.0 (2008-2011), 18.0 (2012-2015), and 23.0 (2016-2019). Counties experiencing smaller median household income growth during and/or after the recession were associated with greater increase in drug mortality than counties experiencing larger median household income growth among the total population and all sociodemographic subgroups. Counties experiencing larger increases in unemployment rates and percentage of vacant housing units were associated with greater increase in drug mortality than counties experiencing smaller or no increase in unemployment rates and percentage of vacant housing units among certain sociodemographic subgroups. Findings suggest the importance of local economic contexts in understanding drug mortality risk since the recession. Drug overdose prevention polices need to be formulated by taking local economic changes following a major recession into consideration.

摘要

我们旨在研究自大衰退以来,县级经济变化是否与县级药物死亡率的变化有关,以及这种关联是否在主要社会人口统计学亚组中均匀分布。使用疾病控制和预防中心的广泛在线流行病学研究数据(2004-2019 年),结合人口普查数据,我们通过包括县级经济变化作为主要暴露因素,并将 2004-2007 年(即衰退前)至 2008-2011 年、2012-2015 年和 2016-2019 年的每 10 万人的县级药物相关死亡率(作为因变量),对 1833 个县进行了固定效应分析。我们的研究结果表明,药物死亡率从 13.9(2004-2007 年)上升到 16.0(2008-2011 年)、18.0(2012-2015 年)和 23.0(2016-2019 年)。在衰退期间和/或之后经历中等家庭收入增长较小的县与经历中等家庭收入增长较大的县相比,药物死亡率的增长更大,在所有社会人口统计学亚组中都是如此。与失业率和空置房屋单元百分比增长较小或没有增长的县相比,失业率和空置房屋单元百分比增长较大的县的药物死亡率增长更大,在某些社会人口统计学亚组中也是如此。研究结果表明,地方经济背景在理解衰退后药物死亡率风险方面的重要性。需要制定药物过量预防政策,考虑到大衰退后地方经济的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ec/9737402/754b359795ac/ijerph-19-16261-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ec/9737402/c79d52d52ea6/ijerph-19-16261-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ec/9737402/d18064862f95/ijerph-19-16261-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ec/9737402/754b359795ac/ijerph-19-16261-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ec/9737402/c79d52d52ea6/ijerph-19-16261-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ec/9737402/d18064862f95/ijerph-19-16261-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ec/9737402/754b359795ac/ijerph-19-16261-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
County-Level Economic Changes and Drug Mortality in the United States: Evidence from the Great Recession.县级经济变化与美国的药物死亡率:大衰退的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 5;19(23):16261. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316261.
2
Did the Great Recession affect mortality rates in the metropolitan United States? Effects on mortality by age, gender and cause of death.大衰退是否影响了美国大都市的死亡率?按年龄、性别和死因划分的死亡率影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;189:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
3
Effect of economic recession and impact of health and social protection expenditures on adult mortality: a longitudinal analysis of 5565 Brazilian municipalities.经济衰退的影响以及卫生和社会保护支出对成年人死亡率的影响:对 5565 个巴西城市的纵向分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Nov;7(11):e1575-e1583. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30409-7.
4
Widening socio-economic disparities in early childhood obesity in Los Angeles County after the Great Recession.大衰退后洛杉矶县儿童期肥胖的社会经济差距扩大。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Aug;21(12):2301-2310. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018000666. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
5
Economic decline, incarceration, and mortality from drug use disorders in the USA between 1983 and 2014: an observational analysis.1983 年至 2014 年期间美国经济衰退、监禁与药物使用障碍导致的死亡率:观察性分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jul;4(7):e326-e333. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30104-5.
6
Response to Economic Shock: The Impact of Recession on Rural-Urban Suicides in the United States.应对经济冲击:衰退对美国农村-城市自杀率的影响。
J Rural Health. 2019 Mar;35(2):253-261. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12334. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
7
The Great Recession and America's Geography of Unemployment.大衰退与美国的失业地理分布
Demogr Res. 2016;35:891-928. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.30. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
8
A growing socioeconomic divide: Effects of the Great Recession on perceived economic distress in the United States.日益扩大的社会经济鸿沟:大衰退对美国民众经济困境感知的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214947. eCollection 2019.
9
Did Medicaid slow declines in access to health care during the great recession?医疗补助是否减缓了大衰退期间医疗保健机会的减少?
Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug;56(4):655-667. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13645. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
10
Premature mortality from all causes and drug poisonings in the USA according to socioeconomic status and rurality: an analysis of death certificate data by county from 2000-15.根据社会经济地位和农村地区划分的美国全因和药物中毒导致的过早死亡率:2000-15 年按县划分的死亡证明数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Feb;4(2):e97-e106. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30208-1. Epub 2019 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in the association between county industrial composition and working-age mortality from 2000 to 2022.2000年至2022年期间县域产业构成与劳动年龄人口死亡率之间关联的变化。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Jul 29;31:101849. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101849. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Prior emergency medical services utilization is a risk factor for in-hospital death among patients with substance misuse: a retrospective cohort study.有滥用药物史的患者,其先前使用急诊医疗服务是院内死亡的一个危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01025-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the role of urban social and physical environment in opioid overdose events using found geospatial data.利用发现的地理空间数据了解城市社会和物理环境在阿片类药物过量事件中的作用。
Health Place. 2022 May;75:102792. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102792. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
2
Opioid-related emergencies in New York City after the Great Recession.大衰退后纽约市与阿片类药物相关的紧急情况。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Jun;125:108311. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108311. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
3
The ecology of overdose mortality in Philadelphia.
费城药物过量致死的生态学研究
Health Place. 2020 Nov;66:102430. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102430. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Association of negative financial shocks during the Great Recession with depressive symptoms and substance use in the USA: the CARDIA study.大衰退期间的负面财务冲击与美国抑郁症状和物质使用的关联:CARDIA 研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Dec;74(12):995-1001. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-213917. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
5
Regional Differences in the Drugs Most Frequently Involved in Drug Overdose Deaths: United States, 2017.2017年美国药物过量死亡中最常涉及药物的地区差异
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019 Oct;68(12):1-16.
6
Polysubstance Use: A Broader Understanding of Substance Use During the Opioid Crisis.多物质使用:在阿片类药物危机期间对物质使用的更广泛理解。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Feb;110(2):244-250. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305412. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
7
Economic decline, incarceration, and mortality from drug use disorders in the USA between 1983 and 2014: an observational analysis.1983 年至 2014 年期间美国经济衰退、监禁与药物使用障碍导致的死亡率:观察性分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jul;4(7):e326-e333. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30104-5.
8
Drivers of the fatal drug epidemic.致命毒品泛滥的根源。
J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;64:25-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
9
The triple wave epidemic: Supply and demand drivers of the US opioid overdose crisis.三重波流行疫情:美国阿片类药物过量危机的供需驱动因素。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Sep;71:183-188. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
10
Wage and Employment Growth in America's Drug Epidemic: Is All Growth Created Equal?美国毒品泛滥时期的工资与就业增长:所有增长都一样吗?
Am J Agric Econ. 2018 Oct;100(5):1357-1374. doi: 10.1093/ajae/aay069. Epub 2018 Sep 11.