• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国中部典型农业区小型茶农对国家可追溯平台的认知

The Perception of the National Traceability Platform among Small-Scale Tea Farmers in Typical Agricultural Areas in Central China.

机构信息

College of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 5;19(23):16280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316280.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192316280
PMID:36498350
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9738394/
Abstract

As one of the key technologies to ensure the safety of agricultural products, the national traceability platform is being widely promoted in China. However, it has not yet been widely adopted among farmers, especially small-scale farmers. Farmers are both producers and direct participants in the traceability of agricultural products. Their perception directly affects the effectiveness of the promotion of the national traceability platform. This study explores the perception of the national traceability platform among small-scale tea farmers in typical agricultural areas in central China. This research employed Q methodology, an approach that integrates both qualitative and quantitative data allowing individuals' subjective understandings of a specific topic to be studied. The Q-sort procedure was performed in the field with 16 small-scale tea farmers. Next, Q-factor analyses were conducted using the Ken-Q analysis. The results show that small-scale tea farmers have different perceptions of the national traceability platform. Their main characteristics are active participation, resistant participation, risk aversion, and being driven by pressure. These four categories covered 52% of the perceived variance. Meanwhile, there is also a degree of internal consistency in the perception of small-scale tea farmers. Specifically, they are all concerned that participating in the national traceability platform may increase the cost and risk of cultivation and that it is difficult to obtain support from agricultural technicians. Therefore, understanding the perceptions of tea farmers of the national traceability platform is the premise for formulating effective promotion policies. Our research sheds light on the decision-making mechanisms for small-scale tea farmers to participate in national traceability platforms, further expanding the scope of current research on farmer behavior. This research has reference significance for promoting national traceability platforms in China and other countries around the world.

摘要

作为保障农产品安全的关键技术之一,国家追溯平台在中国得到了广泛推广。然而,它尚未在农民中广泛采用,尤其是在小规模农户中。农民既是农产品追溯的生产者,也是直接参与者。他们的认知直接影响国家追溯平台推广的效果。本研究以华中地区典型农业区的小规模茶农为研究对象,探讨了他们对国家追溯平台的认知。本研究采用 Q 方法,这是一种将定性和定量数据相结合的方法,可以研究个体对特定主题的主观理解。在现场对 16 名小规模茶农进行了 Q 分类程序,然后使用 Ken-Q 分析进行了 Q 因子分析。结果表明,小规模茶农对国家追溯平台有不同的认知。他们的主要特征是积极参与、抵制参与、规避风险和迫于压力参与。这四个类别涵盖了 52%的感知差异。同时,小规模茶农的认知也存在一定的内部一致性。具体来说,他们都担心参与国家追溯平台会增加种植的成本和风险,并且难以获得农业技术员的支持。因此,了解茶农对国家追溯平台的认知是制定有效推广政策的前提。本研究揭示了小规模茶农参与国家追溯平台的决策机制,进一步拓展了当前对农民行为的研究范围。本研究对中国和世界其他国家推广国家追溯平台具有参考意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/90bcf7fe6598/ijerph-19-16280-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/4443e693f893/ijerph-19-16280-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/c19e32bb7305/ijerph-19-16280-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/fb9e2161c15e/ijerph-19-16280-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/e94d9c92e4be/ijerph-19-16280-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/146f54544439/ijerph-19-16280-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/69c01de97f80/ijerph-19-16280-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/90bcf7fe6598/ijerph-19-16280-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/4443e693f893/ijerph-19-16280-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/c19e32bb7305/ijerph-19-16280-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/fb9e2161c15e/ijerph-19-16280-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/e94d9c92e4be/ijerph-19-16280-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/146f54544439/ijerph-19-16280-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/69c01de97f80/ijerph-19-16280-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c6/9738394/90bcf7fe6598/ijerph-19-16280-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
The Perception of the National Traceability Platform among Small-Scale Tea Farmers in Typical Agricultural Areas in Central China.中国中部典型农业区小型茶农对国家可追溯平台的认知
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 5;19(23):16280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316280.
2
More Income, Less Pollution? How Income Expectation Affects Pesticide Application.收入增加,污染减少?收入预期如何影响农药施用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 23;19(9):5136. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095136.
3
A Study on the Impact of Low-Carbon Technology Application in Agriculture on the Returns of Large-Scale Farmers.农业低碳技术应用对规模农户收益的影响研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 17;19(16):10177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610177.
4
Willingness of Tea Farmers to Adopt Ecological Agriculture Techniques Based on the UTAUT Extended Model.茶农采用生态农业技术的意愿——基于 UTAUT 扩展模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;19(22):15351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215351.
5
Livelihoods, Technological Constraints, and Low-Carbon Agricultural Technology Preferences of Farmers: Analytical Frameworks of Technology Adoption and Farmer Livelihoods.农民的生计、技术约束与低碳农业技术偏好:技术采纳与农民生计的分析框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 18;18(24):13364. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413364.
6
The Effect of Non-Cognitive Ability on Farmer's Ecological Protection of Farmland: Evidence from Major Tea Producing Areas in China.非认知能力对农户耕地生态保护的影响——来自中国主要产茶区的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;19(13):7598. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137598.
7
How Information Communication Technology Can Enhance Evidence-Based Decisions and Farm-to-Fork Animal Traceability for Livestock Farmers.信息通信技术如何增强基于证据的决策和从农场到餐桌的牲畜可追溯性。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2020 Dec 17;2020:1279569. doi: 10.1155/2020/1279569. eCollection 2020.
8
Practices, perceptions, and implications of fertilizer use in East-Central China.中国中东部地区肥料使用的实践、认知及影响
Ambio. 2015 Nov;44(7):647-52. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0639-7. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
9
[Farmer's perception and adaptation intention for climate change in high-cold eco-fragile region: A case of Gannan Plateau, China.].[高寒生态脆弱区农户对气候变化的感知与适应意愿:以中国甘南高原为例。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 Jul;27(7):2329-2339. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.039.
10
The mechanism analysis on the farmers' motivation of using the quality traceability system based on TAM-ECM model.基于技术接受模型-期望确认模型的农户使用质量追溯系统的动机机制分析
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 14;13(1):22283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49795-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Concentrations, leachability, and health risks of mercury in green tea from major production areas in China.中国主要产茶区绿茶中汞的浓度、浸出率及健康风险。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022 Mar 1;232:113279. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113279. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
Q methodology: An underutilised tool in pharmacy practice research.Q 方法论:药剂实践研究中未充分利用的工具。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Jan;18(1):2178-2183. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
3
Region identification of Xinyang Maojian tea using UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS-based metabolomics coupled with multivariate statistical analyses.
基于 UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS 代谢组学结合多元统计分析的信阳毛尖茶产地鉴别。
J Food Sci. 2021 May;86(5):1681-1691. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15676. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
4
Untargeted metabolomics coupled with chemometrics approach for Xinyang Maojian green tea with cultivar, elevation and processing variations.基于非靶向代谢组学联合化学计量学方法研究信阳毛尖绿茶的品种、海拔和加工差异。
Food Chem. 2021 Aug 1;352:129359. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129359. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
5
Traceability (Product Tracing) in Food Systems: An IFT Report Submitted to the FDA, Volume 1: Technical Aspects and Recommendations.食品系统中的可追溯性(产品追踪):提交给美国食品药品监督管理局的一份IFT报告,第1卷:技术层面与建议
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2010 Jan;9(1):92-158. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2009.00097.x.
6
Factors affecting the willingness of agricultural green production from the perspective of farmers' perceptions.从农民认知角度看影响农业绿色生产意愿的因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 10;738:140289. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140289. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Farmers' preferences for high-input agriculture supported by site-specific extension services: Evidence from a choice experiment in Nigeria.特定地点推广服务支持下农民对高投入农业的偏好:来自尼日利亚一项选择实验的证据。
Agric Syst. 2019 Jul;173:12-26. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.02.003.
8
Recent Advances in the Understanding of the Health Benefits and Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Green Tea Polyphenols.绿茶多酚的健康益处及其分子机制的研究进展。
J Agric Food Chem. 2019 Jan 30;67(4):1029-1043. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06146. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
9
Does dual reduction in chemical fertilizer and pesticides improve nutrient loss and tea yield and quality? A pilot study in a green tea garden in Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China.化肥和农药双减是否能提高养分流失和茶叶产量与质量?来自中国浙江绍兴绿茶园的一项试点研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(3):2464-2476. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3732-1. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
10
When and how to use Q methodology to understand perspectives in conservation research.何时以及如何使用 Q 方法论来理解保护研究中的观点。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Oct;32(5):1185-1194. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13123. Epub 2018 Jul 20.