Doctoral Program in Health Sciences, International Doctoral School, University of Murcia, Espinardo, Murcia, Spain.
Murcian Health Service, Murcia, Spain.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023 Jan;68(1):84-98. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13446. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
Freedom of movement has been identified as a key issue for pregnant individuals during the birthing process, even if they opt for epidural analgesia, which has relegated people to more static positions during birth for many years. The aims of this systematic review were to evaluate the influence of mobility and positional changes on perinatal and neonatal outcomes in people in labor with epidural analgesia, describe the range of movement interventions used during the first and second stage of labor, and describe the level of motor blockade among people with low-dose epidural analgesia.
Bibliographic databases (Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL) were consulted from December 2020 to January 2021. The articles selected were clinical trials and observational or analytical studies, the subject of which was mobilization during labor in people with epidural analgesia. The outcome measures were mode of birth, duration of labor, and extrauterine adaptation after birth. A narrative synthesis was used to describe the types of movements interventions employed during the stages of labor and the level of motor blockade among people with low-dose epidural analgesia.
Ten articles were selected (8 clinical trials, one cross-sectional study, and one quasiexperimental study), with a total sample of 6086 individuals. A meta-analysis showed nonsignificant results between groups for mode of birth (relative risk [RR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.87-1.14), duration of labor (RR, 1.64; 95% CI, -34.57 to 37.86), and extrauterine adaptation after birth (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.39-1.93). There was heterogeneity among studies in the type of movement interventions used during the first and second stage of labor.
Although no clear benefit was observed for mobilization in epidural labor, no detrimental effects were found either, so perinatal care providers should encourage mobilization if the laboring person so desires, throughout the entire childbirth process.
行动自由已被确定为分娩过程中孕妇的一个关键问题,即使她们选择了硬膜外镇痛,这也使人们在分娩过程中多年来一直保持更静止的姿势。本系统评价的目的是评估在接受硬膜外镇痛的分娩人群中,活动和体位变化对围产儿和新生儿结局的影响,描述在第一产程和第二产程中使用的活动干预措施的范围,并描述低剂量硬膜外镇痛人群中的运动阻滞程度。
2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 1 月,检索了文献数据库(Web of Science、Cochrane、CINAHL)。选择的文章为临床试验和观察性或分析性研究,主题为硬膜外镇痛分娩过程中的活动。结局指标为分娩方式、产程持续时间和出生后宫外适应情况。采用叙述性综合法描述分娩各阶段的运动干预措施类型和低剂量硬膜外镇痛人群的运动阻滞程度。
共纳入 10 篇文章(8 项临床试验、1 项横断面研究和 1 项类实验研究),共计 6086 名个体。Meta 分析显示,分娩方式(相对风险 [RR],1.00;95%置信区间,0.87-1.14)、产程持续时间(RR,1.64;95%置信区间,-34.57 至 37.86)和出生后宫外适应(RR,0.86;95%置信区间,0.39-1.93)两组间无显著差异。在第一产程和第二产程中使用的运动干预措施类型方面,研究间存在异质性。
尽管在硬膜外分娩中活动没有明显的益处,但也没有发现不利影响,因此,如果分娩者有此意愿,围产期护理提供者应在整个分娩过程中鼓励其活动。