Xu Ying, Warwick Jane, Eramudugolla Ranmalee, Huque Hamidul, Anstey Kaarin J, Peters Ruth
Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Margarete Ainsworth Building, Barker Street, Randwick, NSW 2031 Australia.
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia.
Eur J Ageing. 2022 Mar 28;19(4):1181-1188. doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00694-2. eCollection 2022 Dec.
The literature on subjective memory concerns (SMC) as a predictor for future cognitive decline is varied. Furthermore, recent research has pointed to additional complexity arising from variability in the experience of SMC themselves (i.e. whether they are remitting or sustained over time). We investigated the associations between SMC and objectively measured cognition in an Australian population-based cohort. Four waves (4-year intervals between waves) of data from 1236 participants (aged 62.4 ± 1.5 years, 53% male) were used. We categorized participants as experiencing SMC, when they indicated that their memory problems might interfere with their day-to-day life and/or they had seen a doctor about their memory. SMC was categorized as "no" reported SMC, "remitting", "new-onset" or "sustained" SMC. Cognitive assessment of immediate and delayed recall, working memory, psychomotor speed, attention and processing speed were assessed using a neuropsychological battery. Eighteen percent of participants were characterised as having SMC: 6% (77) "remitting", 6% (77) "new-onset" and 6% (69) "sustained" SMC. There was no consistent evidence for an association between SMC and subsequent decline in cognition. However, SMC was associated with poorer performance on contemporaneous tasks of attention and processing speed compared to "no" SMC. Asking about SMC may indicate a current decline in cognitive function but, in this sample at least, did not indicate an increased risk of future decline.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10433-022-00694-2.
关于主观记忆问题(SMC)作为未来认知衰退预测指标的文献参差不齐。此外,最近的研究指出,SMC自身体验的变异性(即它们是否随时间缓解或持续)会带来更多复杂性。我们在澳大利亚一个基于人群的队列中研究了SMC与客观测量的认知之间的关联。使用了1236名参与者(年龄62.4±1.5岁,53%为男性)的四轮数据(每轮间隔4年)。当参与者表示他们的记忆问题可能会干扰日常生活和/或他们曾就记忆问题看过医生时,我们将其归类为经历了SMC。SMC被分类为“未报告”SMC、“缓解型”、“新发”或“持续型”SMC。使用一套神经心理测试对即时和延迟回忆、工作记忆、心理运动速度、注意力和处理速度进行认知评估。18%的参与者被判定有SMC:6%(77人)为“缓解型”,6%(77人)为“新发”,6%(69人)为“持续型”SMC。没有一致的证据表明SMC与随后的认知衰退之间存在关联。然而,与“未报告”SMC相比,SMC与同期注意力和处理速度任务的较差表现相关。询问SMC可能表明当前认知功能下降,但至少在这个样本中,并未表明未来衰退风险增加。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10433-022-00694-2获取的补充材料。