Duan Cheche, Zeng Yan, Zhou Yicheng, Li Yingying
School of Government, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Excellent Innovation Team of Local Government and Social Governance, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 23;13:1027427. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027427. eCollection 2022.
Effective grassroots governance is the foundation for the stability of state power, but the "invalid busyness" behavior of a few grassroots cadres has seriously deteriorated the local political ecology. In order to gain a deeper understanding of the mechanism of "invalid busyness" behavior of grassroots cadres, this paper, following the analysis of typological research and combined with publicly available data, classifies the "invalid busyness" behavior of grassroots cadres into eight types, including hedging and self-preservation, drifting with the stream, patchwork response, conforming old rulers, replacing targets, blame avoidance, trace doctrine, and self-waiver. It is found that the "invalid busyness" behavior of grassroots cadres is shaped by the risk society paradox, local management paradox, incentive intensity paradox and technical governance paradox, and the "invalid busyness" behavior of grassroots cadres needs to be corrected from the four-dimensional logic of incentive, restraint, deep care, and strict control. This study systematically describes the manifestation, causes and correction mechanism of the "invalid busyness" behavior of grassroots cadres, which enriches and expands the theoretical research on the performance behavior of grassroots cadres.
有效的基层治理是国家政权稳定的基础，但少数基层干部的“无效忙碌”行为严重恶化了当地政治生态。为了更深入地了解基层干部“无效忙碌”行为的机制，本文在分析类型学研究的基础上，结合公开数据，将基层干部的“无效忙碌”行为分为八类，包括推诿自保、随波逐流、拼凑应对、依循旧规、更换目标、规避问责、痕迹主义和自我放弃。研究发现，基层干部的“无效忙碌”行为是由风险社会悖论、地方治理悖论、激励强度悖论和技术治理悖论塑造的，基层干部的“无效忙碌”行为需要从激励、约束、深度关怀和严格管控的四维逻辑进行矫正。本研究系统地描述了基层干部“无效忙碌”行为的表现、成因及矫正机制，丰富和拓展了基层干部绩效行为的理论研究。
