Alberda Daphne L, Duits Nils, van den Bos Kees, Autsema Anneke, Kempes Maaike
Department of Science and Education, Netherlands Institute of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology (NIFP), Utrecht, Netherlands.
Department of Psychology and School of Law, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 23;13:1000186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000186. eCollection 2022.
Although many studies have examined various aspects of terrorism, relatively little is known about risk indicators associated with specific types of terrorist offences. To partly fill this void, this study explores differences on risk indicators of the Violent Extremism Risk Assessment tool (VERA-2R) between 21 Jihadist offenders who were convicted for homicide and a comparison group of 30 Jihadist offenders convicted for other Jihadist terrorist offences. In doing so, we use judicial data from the European Database of Terrorist offenders (EDT). The results reveal that a number of risk and protective indicators differ between both groups. Both terrorist offender groups often expressed grievances about perceived injustice, but the homicide group more frequently expressed anger, moral outrage, or hatred in response to the perceived injustice than the comparison group. The homicide group also identified their attacks more often than the comparison group, and were more actively engaged in planning and preparation them. Additionally, the homicide group was less often motivated to commit their terrorist offences by group belonging compared with the non-homicide group. With respect to the protective indicators, persons in the comparison group more often reject violence as a means to achieve goals. Although further research is necessary, the results from this study indicate that a differentiated approach might be needed for risk assessment and risk management of the terrorist offender population.
尽管许多研究探讨了恐怖主义的各个方面,但对于与特定类型恐怖主义罪行相关的风险指标却知之甚少。为了部分填补这一空白,本研究探讨了21名因杀人罪被定罪的圣战主义罪犯与30名因其他圣战主义恐怖主义罪行被定罪的圣战主义罪犯在暴力极端主义风险评估工具(VERA - 2R)风险指标上的差异。在此过程中,我们使用了欧洲恐怖主义罪犯数据库(EDT)的司法数据。结果显示,两组之间的一些风险和保护指标存在差异。两个恐怖主义罪犯群体都经常表达对感知到的不公正的不满,但杀人罪群体在回应感知到的不公正时比对照组更频繁地表达愤怒、道德义愤或仇恨。杀人罪群体也比对照组更频繁地将其袭击认定为自己所为,并且在策划和准备袭击方面更加积极。此外与非杀人罪群体相比,杀人罪群体因群体归属感而实施恐怖主义罪行的动机较低。关于保护指标,对照组中的人更经常拒绝将暴力作为实现目标的手段。尽管有必要进行进一步研究,但本研究结果表明,可能需要一种差异化方法来对恐怖主义罪犯群体进行风险评估和风险管理。