• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预警行为在威胁评估中的作用:探索与建议的分类。

The role of warning behaviors in threat assessment: an exploration and suggested typology.

机构信息

Dept. of Psychiatry, Univ. of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, San Diego, CA 92169, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 2012 May-Jun;30(3):256-79. doi: 10.1002/bsl.999. Epub 2011 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1002/bsl.999
PMID:22556034
Abstract

The concept of warning behaviors offers an additional perspective in threat assessment. Warning behaviors are acts which constitute evidence of increasing or accelerating risk. They are acute, dynamic, and particularly toxic changes in patterns of behavior which may aid in structuring a professional's judgment that an individual of concern now poses a threat - whether the actual target has been identified or not. They require an operational response. A typology of eight warning behaviors for assessing the threat of intended violence is proposed: pathway, fixation, identification, novel aggression, energy burst, leakage, directly communicated threat, and last resort warning behaviors. Previous research on risk factors associated with such warning behaviors is reviewed, and examples of each warning behavior from various intended violence cases are presented, including public figure assassination, adolescent and adult mass murder, corporate celebrity stalking, and both domestic and foreign acts of terrorism. Practical applications and future research into warning behaviors are suggested.

摘要

预警行为的概念为威胁评估提供了一个额外的视角。预警行为是构成风险增加或加速的证据的行为。它们是行为模式中急剧、动态且特别具有毒性的变化,可能有助于构建专业人员的判断,即关注的个体现在是否构成威胁——无论实际目标是否已经确定。它们需要采取行动响应。本文提出了用于评估故意暴力威胁的八种预警行为的类型学:途径、固定、识别、新的攻击、能量爆发、泄漏、直接传达的威胁和最后的预警行为。本文回顾了与这些预警行为相关的风险因素的研究,并展示了来自各种故意暴力案件的每种预警行为的示例,包括公众人物暗杀、青少年和成年大规模谋杀、公司名人跟踪以及国内外的恐怖主义行为。本文还提出了预警行为的实际应用和未来研究建议。

相似文献

1
The role of warning behaviors in threat assessment: an exploration and suggested typology.预警行为在威胁评估中的作用:探索与建议的分类。
Behav Sci Law. 2012 May-Jun;30(3):256-79. doi: 10.1002/bsl.999. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
2
The concept of leakage in threat assessment.威胁评估中的漏报概念。
Behav Sci Law. 2011 Jul-Aug;29(4):513-27. doi: 10.1002/bsl.986. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
3
The stalking of public figures: management and intervention.公众人物的跟踪行为:管理与干预
J Forensic Sci. 2005 Nov;50(6):1459-65.
4
Attacks on German public figures, 1968-2004: warning behaviors, potentially lethal and non-lethal acts, psychiatric status, and motivations.1968-2004 年针对德国公众人物的袭击:预警行为、可能致命和非致命行为、精神状态和动机。
Behav Sci Law. 2011 Mar-Apr;29(2):155-79. doi: 10.1002/bsl.979. Epub 2011 Mar 6.
5
[School shootings by adult outsiders – psychiatric aspects and risk markers].[成年外来者校园枪击案——精神科方面及风险标志物]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2016;44(3):189-97. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000421.
6
Advances in stalking risk assessment. stalking 风险评估的进展。
Behav Sci Law. 2011 Mar-Apr;29(2):180-201. doi: 10.1002/bsl.973. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
7
The RECON typology of stalking: reliability and validity based upon a large sample of North American stalkers.跟踪行为的RECON类型学:基于大量北美跟踪者样本的信度和效度
J Forensic Sci. 2006 Jan;51(1):147-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00030.x.
8
Stalking: developing an empirical typology to classify stalkers.跟踪行为:构建一种实证类型学以对跟踪者进行分类。
J Forensic Sci. 2002 Jan;47(1):152-8.
9
Classification systems for stalking behavior.跟踪行为的分类系统。
J Forensic Sci. 2014 Jan;59(1):250-4. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12262. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
10
Lone-actor Terrorism and Impulsivity.孤狼式恐怖主义与冲动性
J Forensic Sci. 2017 Nov;62(6):1643-1646. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13500. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Extreme overvalued beliefs and identities: revisiting the drivers of violent extremism.极端高估的信念与身份认同:重新审视暴力极端主义的驱动因素
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 5;16:1556919. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1556919. eCollection 2025.
2
Identity-Driven Targeted Violence in a College Setting: An Overview of Prevalence and Behavioral Responses.高校环境中的身份驱动型目标暴力:流行程度与行为反应概述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 30;21(10):1312. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101312.
3
Leaking in Intimate Partner Homicide: A Systematic Review.
亲密伴侣杀人案中的漏报:系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Oct;25(4):3005-3019. doi: 10.1177/15248380241237213. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
4
Identifying risk factors for Jihadist terrorist offenders committing homicide: An explorative analysis using the European Database of Terrorist offenders.识别参与杀人的圣战恐怖主义罪犯的风险因素:使用欧洲恐怖主义罪犯数据库进行的探索性分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 23;13:1000186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000186. eCollection 2022.
5
Threats to public figures and association with approach, as a proxy for violence: The importance of grievance.对公众人物的威胁以及与暴力替代手段(接近行为)的关联:不满情绪的重要性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 26;13:998155. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.998155. eCollection 2022.
6
Fixated and grievance-fuelled persons: considerations on the dangers of gaps, silos and disconnects.固执且心怀不满的人:关于隔阂、孤立和脱节之危险的思考
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Feb 10;29(6):854-870. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1995518. eCollection 2022.
7
Communication of Intent to Do Harm Preceding Mass Public Shootings in the United States, 1966 to 2019.美国 1966 年至 2019 年大规模公共枪击事件前的伤害意图沟通。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133073. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33073.
8
Forensic risk assessment interviews with youth: how do we elicit the most reliable and complete information?对青少年进行法医风险评估访谈:我们如何获取最可靠和完整的信息?
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Mar 18;27(3):428-440. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1734982. eCollection 2020.
9
Teacher and Peer Responses to Warning Behavior in 11 School Shooting Cases in Germany.德国11起校园枪击案中教师和同伴对警示行为的反应
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 24;11:1592. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01592. eCollection 2020.
10
Towards a national strategy for managing fixated persons in Australia.迈向澳大利亚管理痴迷者的国家战略。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2019 Jan 17;26(3):457-467. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1506722. eCollection 2019.