Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间感知到的组织支持对知识型人才抑制性建言行为的影响:探究数字化水平的调节作用

The effect of perceived organizational support on the prohibitive voice behavior of knowledgeable talents during the COVID-19 pandemic: Exploring moderating role of the digitalization level.

作者信息

Chen Xiao, Ren Kangjun, Shen Yan

机构信息

Talents Office, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.

School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 23;13:1020263. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1020263. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

This study focuses on the effect of perceived organizational support on the prohibitive voice of knowledgeable talents and on the factors influencing that voice during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Grounding our research in social exchange theory and the Chinese sociocultural background, we collected data from 714 questionnaires from universities in Zhejiang Province and analysize by linear regression and found, first, that perceived organizational support significantly increased the prohibitive voice of knowledgeable talents and, second, that in the relationship between perceived organizational support and the prohibitive voice of those talents, the level of digitalization level of an organization has a positive the effect of perceived organizational support on prohibitive voice behavior. This study enriches the theory of voice behavior, helps universities understand the behavioral patterns of knowledgeable talents and guides the cultivation of an atmosphere with prohibitive voice behavior.

摘要

本研究聚焦于在中国新冠疫情期间,感知到的组织支持对知识型人才的抑制性建言的影响以及影响该建言的因素。基于社会交换理论和中国社会文化背景开展研究,我们收集了来自浙江省高校的714份问卷数据,并通过线性回归进行分析,结果发现,第一,感知到的组织支持显著提高了知识型人才的抑制性建言;第二,在感知到的组织支持与这些人才的抑制性建言之间的关系中,组织的数字化水平对感知到的组织支持对抑制性建言行为有正向影响。本研究丰富了建言行为理论,有助于高校了解知识型人才的行为模式,并指导营造具有抑制性建言行为的氛围。

相似文献

2
The Inhibitory Effect of Perceived Organizational Politics on Employee Voice Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model.
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 17;12:727893. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727893. eCollection 2021.
4
Does justice matter in voice? Inclusive leadership and employee voice: the moderating role of organizational justice perception.
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 11;14:1313922. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1313922. eCollection 2023.
5
Regulatory Fit Demonstrates That Prohibitive Voice Does Not Lead to Low Performance Evaluation.
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 26;11:581162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581162. eCollection 2020.
7
When prohibitive voice is effective? Exploring the jointly moderating role of hindrance stressor and work-based construal level.
Heliyon. 2022 Oct 18;8(10):e11116. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11116. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
I will speak up if my voice is socially desirable: A moderated mediating process of promotive versus prohibitive voice.
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Sep;100(5):1641-52. doi: 10.1037/a0039046. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
9
Employee voice behavior as a critical factor for organizational sustainability in the telecommunications industry.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 3;15(9):e0238451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238451. eCollection 2020.
10
Effect of Organizational Socialization of New Employees on Team Innovation Performance: A Cross-Level Model.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Apr 21;15:1017-1031. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S359773. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of water safety knowledge on adolescents' drowning risk behaviors: a framework of risk-protect integrated and KAP theory.
Front Public Health. 2024 May 10;12:1354231. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1354231. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Mobile shoppers' response to Covid-19 phobia, pessimism and smartphone addiction: Does social influence matter?
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2022 Jan;174:121249. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121249. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
2
Smartphone Use, Technology Affordance for Healthcare and Elders' Life Satisfaction.
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 11;10:861897. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.861897. eCollection 2022.
4
Consequences of COVID-19 Confinement for Teachers: Family-Work Interactions, Technostress, and Perceived Organizational Support.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;18(21):11259. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111259.
5
COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration.
J Bus Res. 2021 Nov;136:602-611. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
6
Family Business Internationalization in Paradox: Effects of Socioemotional Wealth and Entrepreneurial Spirit.
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 22;12:667615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667615. eCollection 2021.
7
Daily emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov;25(4):902-911. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12450. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
8
The Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Chinese Individuals.
Yonsei Med J. 2020 May;61(5):438-440. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.5.438.
9
Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):547-560. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
10
The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China.
Psychiatry Res. 2020 May;287:112934. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验