Suppr超能文献

从牛血液中分离外周血单个核细胞的方法比较。

Comparison of methods to isolate peripheral blood mononuclear cells from cattle blood.

作者信息

Stabel Judith R, Wherry Taylor L T

机构信息

USDA-ARS, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA 50010, USA.

Department of Veterinary Pathology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA.

出版信息

J Immunol Methods. 2023 Jan;512:113407. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2022.113407. Epub 2022 Dec 15.

Abstract

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are critical for assessment of host immune responses to infectious disease. The isolation of PBMCs from whole blood is a laborious process involving density gradients and multiple centrifugation steps. In the present study we compared a more traditional method of PBMC isolation used in our laboratory to two novel methods of cell isolation for efficiency, cell viability, and enumeration of cell subsets. Our laboratory method uses Histopaque-1077 density gradient in standard conical tubes and this was compared with isolation of cells using SepMate™ tubes, a novel conical tube containing an insert to separate the density gradient. Multiple experiments were performed to optimize the SepMate™ tubes for use with cattle blood. A final experiment was conducted to compare traditional methodology, the optimized SepMate™ method with a more novel method using cell preparation tubes (CPT-10 vacutainers containing density gradient). Results demonstrated that optimization of the SepMate™ tube methodology was necessary, including dilution of blood and addition of centrifugation steps to reduce platelet contamination. The CPT-10 tubes worked well but cell recovery was lower compared to other methods. Both of the newer methods were comparable to a modified version of our traditional laboratory method of PBMC isolation in terms of numbers of recovered viable cells and the frequency of immune cell subsets. Additionally, efficiency was improved, particularly with the SepMate™ tube method, resulting in reduced time in the laboratory as well as reduced usage of plasticware.

摘要

外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)对于评估宿主对传染病的免疫反应至关重要。从全血中分离PBMC是一个繁琐的过程,涉及密度梯度和多个离心步骤。在本研究中,我们将实验室中使用的一种更传统的PBMC分离方法与两种新型细胞分离方法在效率、细胞活力和细胞亚群计数方面进行了比较。我们实验室的方法是在标准锥形管中使用Histopaque-1077密度梯度,并将其与使用SepMate™管分离细胞的方法进行比较,SepMate™管是一种新型锥形管,带有一个用于分离密度梯度的插入物。进行了多项实验以优化SepMate™管用于牛血的方法。最后进行了一项实验,比较传统方法、优化后的SepMate™方法与使用细胞制备管(含有密度梯度的CPT-10真空采血管)的更新颖方法。结果表明,优化SepMate™管方法是必要的,包括稀释血液和增加离心步骤以减少血小板污染。CPT-10管效果良好,但与其他方法相比细胞回收率较低。就回收的活细胞数量和免疫细胞亚群频率而言,这两种新方法与我们传统实验室PBMC分离方法的改进版本相当。此外,效率得到了提高,特别是使用SepMate™管方法,减少了实验室操作时间以及塑料制品的使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验