Department of Microbiology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, PROSICS Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, PROSICS Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Int J Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;67:1605386. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1605386. eCollection 2022.
This study aimed to report the protocol and results from the pilot phase of an opportunistic CP-based CD screening program in Barcelona, Spain. Three strategies according to recruitment approach were designed: passive, active and active-community. The study process consisted of signing the informed consent form, recording the patient's data in a web-based database system, and performing the rapid test and blood collection on dry paper. Nineteen pharmacies participated and 64 patients were included during the pilot phase of the study. The rapid diagnostic test (RDT) was positive in 2/64 (3.13%) cases. Of the 49 DBS samples that arrived at the laboratory, 22 (45%) were collected incorrectly. After quantitative and qualitative assessment of the program, the dry paper sample and passive strategy were ruled out. DBS sampling and the passive strategy are not suitable for CD screening in community pharmacies. There is a need to expand the number of participating pharmacies and individuals to determine whether conducting a RDT in community pharmacies is an effective screening method to increase access to CD diagnosis in a non-endemic area.
本研究旨在报告西班牙巴塞罗那一项基于机遇的 CD 筛选计划的试点阶段的方案和结果。根据招募方法设计了三种策略:被动、主动和社区主动。研究过程包括签署知情同意书、在基于网络的数据库系统中记录患者数据,以及在干式滤纸上进行快速检测和采血。有 19 家药店参与,在研究的试点阶段共纳入 64 名患者。快速诊断检测(RDT)在 64 例中的 2 例(3.13%)呈阳性。在送到实验室的 49 份 DBS 样本中,有 22 份(45%)采集不当。对方案进行定量和定性评估后,排除了干式滤纸条样本和被动策略。社区药店的 DBS 采样和被动策略不适合 CD 筛查。需要扩大参与药店和个人的数量,以确定在社区药店进行 RDT 是否是一种有效的筛选方法,以增加在非流行地区进行 CD 诊断的机会。