Suppr超能文献

干血斑和快速诊断检测的分析评估作为慢性恰加斯病血清学社区筛查的新策略。

Analytical Evaluation of Dried Blood Spot and Rapid Diagnostic Test as a New Strategy for Serological Community Screening for Chronic Chagas Disease.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, PROSICS Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Laboratory of Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.

出版信息

Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Sep 15;11:736630. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.736630. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chagas disease is a public health problem not only in Latin America, but also in other regions, including Spain, due to migration movements. Conventional serological diagnosis requires an invasive sample (plasma or serum) and a well-equipped laboratory. To circumvent those limitations, blood samples dried on filter paper (DBS) or Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) could be a practical alternative to reference protocol for serological screening in epidemiological studies. We evaluated the usefulness of dried blood sampling and a rapid diagnostic test (Trypanosoma Detect™) for the detection of antibodies against for their use in community-based screening.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of 162 stored paired whole-blood and serum samples from Latin American migrants and 25 negative-control blood samples were included. Diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease was performed in serum according to WHO algorithms. Blood samples were retrospectively collected as dried spots and then analyzed using two different serological techniques, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (E-CLIA). Whole-blood samples were also used to evaluate a rapid diagnostic test based on immunochromatography. A better correlation with conventional serum was observed in dried blood elutes using E-CLIA than ELISA (97% vs. 77% sensitivity, respectively). Both assays reported 100% specificity. The median cut-off index values of E-CLIA for dried blood were significantly lower than those for serum (138.1 vs. 243.3, <0.05). The Trypanosoma Detect™ test presented a sensitivity and specificity of 89.6% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of antibodies against in dried blood samples shows a higher sensitivity when using E-CLIA compared with ELISA. Trypanosoma Detect™ is easier to use but has a lower sensitivity. Hence, we propose a sequential strategy based on performing the rapid test first, and a negative result will be confirmed by DBS-ECLIA for use in community Chagas disease screening programs.

摘要

背景

恰加斯病不仅是拉丁美洲,也是包括西班牙在内的其他地区的公共卫生问题,这是由于移民运动造成的。传统的血清学诊断需要一个有创样本(血浆或血清)和一个设备齐全的实验室。为了规避这些限制,滤纸(DBS)或快速诊断检测(RDT)上的血液样本可以替代参考方案,用于流行病学研究中的血清学筛查。我们评估了干血样采集和快速诊断检测(Trypanosoma Detect™)在社区为基础的筛查中检测针对 的抗体的实用性。

方法/主要发现:共纳入了 162 份拉丁美洲移民的储存全血和血清配对样本以及 25 份阴性对照血样。根据世界卫生组织的算法,在血清中对慢性恰加斯病进行诊断。回顾性地采集血液样本作为干斑,然后使用两种不同的血清学技术(酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和电化学发光免疫分析(E-CLIA)进行分析。还使用全血样本评估基于免疫层析的快速诊断检测。与 ELISA 相比,使用 E-CLIA 分析干血洗脱物与传统血清的相关性更好(分别为 97%和 77%的敏感性)。两种检测方法均报告了 100%的特异性。E-CLIA 对干血的中位数截断指数值明显低于对血清的截断指数值(138.1 与 243.3,<0.05)。Trypanosoma Detect™ 检测的敏感性和特异性分别为 89.6%和 100%。

结论

与 ELISA 相比,使用 E-CLIA 检测干血样本中针对 的抗体具有更高的敏感性。Trypanosoma Detect™ 更易于使用,但敏感性较低。因此,我们建议采用一种基于首先进行快速检测的序贯策略,如果检测结果为阴性,将使用 DBS-ECLIA 进行确认,以便用于社区恰加斯病筛查计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c942/8479190/78769c8693b7/fcimb-11-736630-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验