• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭患者的机器学习模型

Machine learning models in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction patients.

作者信息

Zhao Hengli, Li Peixin, Zhong Guoheng, Xie Kaiji, Zhou Haobin, Ning Yunshan, Xu Dingli, Zeng Qingchun

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 30;9:1042139. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1042139. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.1042139
PMID:36531735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9748556/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) has been recently recognized as a unique phenotype of heart failure (HF) in current practical guideline. However, risk stratification models for mortality and HF re-hospitalization are still lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel machine learning (ML)-derived model to predict the risk of mortality and re-hospitalization for HFmrEF patients.

METHODS

We assessed the risks of mortality and HF re-hospitalization in HFmrEF (45-49%) patients enrolled in the TOPCAT trial. Eight ML-based models were constructed, including 72 candidate variables. The Harrell concordance index (C-index) and DeLong test were used to assess discrimination and the improvement in discrimination between models, respectively. Calibration of the HF risk prediction model was plotted to obtain bias-corrected estimates of predicted versus observed values.

RESULTS

Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression was the best-performing model for 1- and 6-year mortality, with a highest C-indices at 0.83 (95% CI: 0.68-0.94) over a maximum of 6 years of follow-up and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89) for the 1-year follow-up. The random forest (RF) showed the best discrimination for HF re-hospitalization, scoring 0.80 (95% CI: 0.66-0.94) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.71-0.99) at the 6- and 1-year follow-ups, respectively. For risk assessment analysis, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) subscale scores were the most important predictor of readmission outcome in the HFmrEF patients.

CONCLUSION

ML-based models outperformed traditional models at predicting mortality and re-hospitalization in patients with HFmrEF. The results of the risk assessment showed that KCCQ score should be paid increasing attention to in the management of HFmrEF patients.

摘要

目的

射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)最近在当前实用指南中被确认为心力衰竭(HF)的一种独特表型。然而,目前仍缺乏用于死亡率和HF再住院风险分层的模型。本研究旨在开发并验证一种基于机器学习(ML)的新型模型,以预测HFmrEF患者的死亡风险和再住院风险。

方法

我们评估了参加TOPCAT试验的HFmrEF(45 - 49%)患者的死亡风险和HF再住院风险。构建了8个基于ML的模型,包括72个候选变量。分别使用Harrell一致性指数(C指数)和DeLong检验来评估模型的区分度以及模型之间区分度的改善情况。绘制HF风险预测模型的校准图,以获得预测值与观察值的偏差校正估计。

结果

对于1年和6年死亡率,最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)Cox回归是表现最佳的模型,在最长6年的随访中,C指数最高为0.83(95%CI:0.68 - 0.94),1年随访时为0.77(95%CI:0.64 - 0.89)。随机森林(RF)对HF再住院的区分度最佳,在6年和1年随访时的得分分别为0.80(95%CI:0.66 - 0.94)和0.85(95%CI:0.71 - 0.99)。对于风险评估分析,堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ)子量表得分是HFmrEF患者再入院结局的最重要预测因素。

结论

在预测HFmrEF患者的死亡率和再住院率方面,基于ML的模型优于传统模型。风险评估结果表明,在HFmrEF患者的管理中应越来越重视KCCQ评分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2a/9748556/1e329c0a0d78/fcvm-09-1042139-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2a/9748556/8704268748e4/fcvm-09-1042139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2a/9748556/e07303b5a110/fcvm-09-1042139-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2a/9748556/79e60e6ea96c/fcvm-09-1042139-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2a/9748556/d39bdf1838b6/fcvm-09-1042139-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2a/9748556/1e329c0a0d78/fcvm-09-1042139-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2a/9748556/8704268748e4/fcvm-09-1042139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2a/9748556/e07303b5a110/fcvm-09-1042139-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2a/9748556/79e60e6ea96c/fcvm-09-1042139-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2a/9748556/d39bdf1838b6/fcvm-09-1042139-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c2a/9748556/1e329c0a0d78/fcvm-09-1042139-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning models in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction patients.射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭患者的机器学习模型
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 30;9:1042139. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1042139. eCollection 2022.
2
Machine Learning Prediction of Mortality and Hospitalization in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.机器学习预测射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的死亡率和住院率。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jan;8(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
3
Five-year mortality of heart failure with preserved, mildly reduced, and reduced ejection fraction in a 4880 Chinese cohort.在中国 4880 例队列中,射血分数保留、轻度降低和降低的心衰患者的 5 年死亡率。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;9(4):2336-2347. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13921. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
4
Empagliflozin in Heart Failure With Predicted Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction: Data From the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial.恩格列净治疗射血分数保留与降低的心衰患者:来自 EMPA-REG OUTCOME 试验的数据。
J Card Fail. 2021 Aug;27(8):888-895. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.05.012.
5
Clinical characteristics of hospitalized heart failure patients with preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fractions in Japan.日本住院心力衰竭患者射血分数保留、中间范围和降低的临床特征。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;6(3):475-486. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12418. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
6
Machine Learning for Mortality Prediction in Patients With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction.机器学习在射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭患者死亡率预测中的应用。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jun 20;12(12):e029124. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.029124. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
7
Clinical characteristics, one-year change in ejection fraction and long-term outcomes in patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction: a multicentre prospective observational study in Catalonia (Spain).伴有中间范围射血分数的心力衰竭患者的临床特征、射血分数一年变化及长期结局:在加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)进行的一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 21;7(12):e018719. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018719.
8
Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With Traditional Models for Use of Administrative Claims With Electronic Medical Records to Predict Heart Failure Outcomes.利用电子病历中的行政索赔数据进行机器学习方法与传统模型预测心力衰竭结局的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918962. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18962.
9
Clinical characteristics and prognosis of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction: insights from a multi-centre registry study in China.射血分数处于中等范围的心衰的临床特征与预后:来自中国一项多中心注册研究的见解
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1177-1.
10
Dronedarone for the treatment of atrial fibrillation with concomitant heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction: a post-hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial.用多非利特治疗射血分数保留和轻度降低的心衰伴发的心房颤动:ATHENA 试验的事后分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;24(6):1094-1101. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2487. Epub 2022 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of machine learning methods for prediction of heart failure mortality and readmission: meta-analysis.用于预测心力衰竭死亡率和再入院的机器学习方法评估:荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 7;25(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04700-0.
2
Predictive Analytics in Heart Failure Risk, Readmission, and Mortality Prediction: A Review.心力衰竭风险、再入院和死亡率预测中的预测分析:综述
Cureus. 2024 Nov 17;16(11):e73876. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73876. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Machine learning models for predicting risks of MACEs for myocardial infarction patients with different VEGFR2 genotypes.

本文引用的文献

1
Underweight Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.体重过轻与射血分数保留的心力衰竭预后不良相关。
Int Heart J. 2021 Sep 30;62(5):1042-1051. doi: 10.1536/ihj.21-195. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
2
Health Status Predicts Short- and Long-Term Risk of Composite Clinical Outcomes in Acute Heart Failure.健康状况可预测急性心力衰竭综合临床结局的短期和长期风险。
JACC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;9(12):861-873. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
3
2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.
用于预测不同VEGFR2基因型心肌梗死患者发生主要不良心血管事件风险的机器学习模型。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 5;11:1452239. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1452239. eCollection 2024.
4
Web-Based Dynamic Nomogram for Predicting Risk of Mortality in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction.用于预测轻度射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者死亡风险的基于网络的动态列线图
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug 13;17:1959-1972. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S474862. eCollection 2024.
5
Machine learning in heart failure diagnosis, prediction, and prognosis: review.机器学习在心力衰竭诊断、预测及预后中的应用:综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 May 6;86(6):3615-3623. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002138. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2021年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368.
4
Body mass index and outcomes in ischaemic versus non-ischaemic heart failure across the spectrum of ejection fraction.体质指数与射血分数谱中缺血性与非缺血性心力衰竭的结局。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Aug 9;28(9):948-955. doi: 10.1177/2047487320927610. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
5
Use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus: data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在心力衰竭合并 2 型糖尿病患者中的应用:来自瑞典心力衰竭注册登记处的数据。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;23(6):1012-1022. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2131. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
6
Prognostic impact of plasma volume estimated from hemoglobin and hematocrit in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.根据血红蛋白和血细胞比容估算的血浆容量对射血分数保留的心力衰竭的预后影响
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Nov;109(11):1392-1401. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01639-4. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
7
The association between heart failure hospitalization and self-reported domains of health.心力衰竭住院与自我报告健康领域的关联。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Apr;29(4):953-958. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02373-9. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
8
The Impact of Obesity in Heart Failure.肥胖对心力衰竭的影响。
Heart Fail Clin. 2020 Jan;16(1):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2019.08.008.
9
Machine Learning Prediction of Mortality and Hospitalization in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.机器学习预测射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的死亡率和住院率。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jan;8(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
10
Long-term Prognostic Value of Estimated Plasma Volume in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭中估算的血浆容量的长期预后价值。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 7;9(1):14369. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50427-2.