Suppr超能文献

珍稀野生丹顶鹤与白枕鹤肠道菌群的比较分析

Comparative analysis of intestinal flora between rare wild red-crowned crane and white-naped crane.

作者信息

Gao Zhongsi, Song Hongwei, Dong Haiyan, Ji Xiaolong, Lei Zefeng, Tian Ye, Wu Yining, Zou Hongfei

机构信息

College of Wildlife and Protected Area, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China.

Department of Genetics, College of Life Science, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2022 Dec 1;13:1007884. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1007884. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Animal intestines are extremely rich in microbial ecosystems. Numerous studies in different fields, such as epidemiology and histology, have revealed that gut microorganisms considerably mediate the survival and reproduction of animals. However, gut microbiology studies of homogeneously distributed wild cranes are still rare. This study aimed to understand the structural composition of the gut microbial community of wild cranes and elucidate the potential roles of the microorganisms.

METHODS

We used high-throughput sequencing to analyze the gut microbial community structure of wild cranes in the Zhalong Nature Reserve.

RESULTS

A total of 1,965,683 valid tags and 5248 OTUs were obtained from 32 fecal samples. Twenty-six bacteria phyla and 523 genera were annotated from the intestinal tract of the red-crowned crane. Twenty-five bacteria phyla and 625 genera were annotated from the intestine of the white-naped crane. Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes are the dominant bacterial phyla in the intestinal tract of red-crowned cranes, while , , , and were the dominant genera. The dominant bacterial phyla in the intestinal tract of white-naped cranes were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Epsilonbacteraeota, Actinobacteria, and Fusobacteria. However, the dominant genera were , , , , , , , , , and . Firmicutes had significantly higher relative abundance in the intestine of the red-crowned than white-naped cranes ( < 0.05). However, the relative abundance of Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes was significantly higher ( < 0.05) in the intestines of white-naped than red-crowned cranes. The diversity of the intestinal flora between the two crane species was significantly different ( < 0.05). Besides, the alpha diversity of the intestinal flora was higher for white-naped than red-crowned cranes. Eight of the 41 functional pathways differed in the gut of both crane species ( < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Both species live in the same area and have similar feeding and behavioral characteristics. Therefore, host differences are possibly the main factors influencing the structural and functional differences in the composition of the gut microbial community. This study provides important reference data for constructing a crane gut microbial assessment system. The findings have implications for studying deeper relationships between crane gut microbes and genetics, nutrition, immunity, and disease.

摘要

引言

动物肠道拥有极其丰富的微生物生态系统。流行病学和组织学等不同领域的大量研究表明,肠道微生物对动物的生存和繁殖起着重要的调节作用。然而,关于分布均匀的野生鹤类的肠道微生物学研究仍然很少。本研究旨在了解野生鹤类肠道微生物群落的结构组成,并阐明这些微生物的潜在作用。

方法

我们使用高通量测序技术分析扎龙自然保护区野生鹤类的肠道微生物群落结构。

结果

从32份粪便样本中总共获得了1,965,683个有效标签和5248个操作分类单元(OTU)。从丹顶鹤肠道中注释出26个细菌门和523个属。从白枕鹤肠道中注释出25个细菌门和625个属。厚壁菌门、变形菌门和拟杆菌门是丹顶鹤肠道中的优势细菌门,而[此处原文缺失具体属名]是优势属。白枕鹤肠道中的优势细菌门是厚壁菌门、变形菌门、拟杆菌门、ε-变形菌门、放线菌门和梭杆菌门。然而,优势属是[此处原文缺失具体属名]。厚壁菌门在丹顶鹤肠道中的相对丰度显著高于白枕鹤(P<0.05)。然而,放线菌门和拟杆菌门在白枕鹤肠道中的相对丰度显著高于丹顶鹤(P<0.05)。两种鹤类之间肠道菌群的多样性存在显著差异(P<0.05)。此外,白枕鹤肠道菌群的α多样性高于丹顶鹤。在两种鹤类的肠道中,41种功能途径中有8种存在差异(P<0.05)。

讨论

两种鹤类生活在同一区域,具有相似的摄食和行为特征。因此,宿主差异可能是影响肠道微生物群落组成的结构和功能差异的主要因素。本研究为构建鹤类肠道微生物评估系统提供了重要的参考数据。这些发现对于研究鹤类肠道微生物与遗传、营养、免疫和疾病之间更深层次的关系具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d300/9752901/0677642f16d2/fmicb-13-1007884-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验