• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国扎龙国家级自然保护区圈养与半散养丹顶鹤再引入前肠道细菌群落比较

Comparison of the Intestinal Bacterial Communities between Captive and Semi-Free-Range Red-Crowned Cranes () before Reintroduction in Zhalong National Nature Reserve, China.

作者信息

Wu Yining, Wang Huan, Gao Zhongyan, Wang He, Zou Hongfei

机构信息

College of Wildlife and Protected Area, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.

Management Bureau of Heilongjiang Zhalong National Reserve, Qiqihar 161005, China.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2023 Dec 19;14(1):3. doi: 10.3390/ani14010003.

DOI:10.3390/ani14010003
PMID:38200734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10778468/
Abstract

The wild populations of red-crowned cranes () in west China are gradually decreasing, necessitating the optimization of reintroduction measures. This study used 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing technology to compare the gut microbiota communities of cranes living in two modes (captive and semi-free-range) before their reintroduction in Zhalong National Nature Reserve, Heilongjiang Province, China. The results showed that Proteobacteria (74.39%) and Firmicutes (25.29%) were the dominant gut bacterial phyla inhabiting these cranes. Significant differences were found in the gut microbiota community composition between semi-free-range and captive cranes ( < 0.01). , , and were significantly enriched in captive cranes ( < 0.05), while , , , and were more abundant in semi-free-range cranes ( < 0.05). The functions and community structure of gut microbiota were affected by feeding patterns ( < 0.05). The metabolic pathways of ethylbenzene degradation, PPAR signaling pathway, betalain biosynthesis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and shigellosis were up-regulated in semi-free-range cranes < 0.05).

摘要

中国西部野生丹顶鹤种群数量正逐渐减少,因此有必要优化再引入措施。本研究运用16S rRNA高通量测序技术,对中国黑龙江扎龙国家级自然保护区内两种饲养模式(圈养和半散养)下的丹顶鹤在再引入前的肠道微生物群落进行了比较。结果表明,变形菌门(74.39%)和厚壁菌门(25.29%)是栖息于这些丹顶鹤体内的主要肠道细菌门类。半散养丹顶鹤和圈养丹顶鹤的肠道微生物群落组成存在显著差异(P<0.01)。在圈养丹顶鹤中,[具体菌属1]、[具体菌属2]和[具体菌属3]显著富集(P<0.05),而在半散养丹顶鹤中,[具体菌属4]、[具体菌属5]、[具体菌属6]和[具体菌属7]更为丰富(P<0.05)。肠道微生物群的功能和群落结构受饲养模式影响(P<0.05)。在半散养丹顶鹤中,乙苯降解代谢途径、PPAR信号通路、甜菜碱生物合成、系统性红斑狼疮和志贺氏菌病的代谢途径上调(P<0.05)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eece/10778468/e78c7ff01d05/animals-14-00003-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eece/10778468/6e38fb4ffb00/animals-14-00003-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eece/10778468/04ab6b6712df/animals-14-00003-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eece/10778468/8aa40d8428bb/animals-14-00003-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eece/10778468/e78c7ff01d05/animals-14-00003-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eece/10778468/6e38fb4ffb00/animals-14-00003-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eece/10778468/04ab6b6712df/animals-14-00003-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eece/10778468/8aa40d8428bb/animals-14-00003-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eece/10778468/e78c7ff01d05/animals-14-00003-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Intestinal Bacterial Communities between Captive and Semi-Free-Range Red-Crowned Cranes () before Reintroduction in Zhalong National Nature Reserve, China.中国扎龙国家级自然保护区圈养与半散养丹顶鹤再引入前肠道细菌群落比较
Animals (Basel). 2023 Dec 19;14(1):3. doi: 10.3390/ani14010003.
2
Comparative analysis of intestinal flora between rare wild red-crowned crane and white-naped crane.珍稀野生丹顶鹤与白枕鹤肠道菌群的比较分析
Front Microbiol. 2022 Dec 1;13:1007884. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1007884. eCollection 2022.
3
Effects of captivity and artificial breeding on microbiota in feces of the red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis).圈养和人工繁殖对丹顶鹤(Grus japonensis)粪便中微生物群的影响。
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 15;6:33350. doi: 10.1038/srep33350.
4
Association between diet and the gut microbiome of young captive red-crowned cranes (Grus japonensis).饮食与圈养丹顶鹤(Grus japonensis)肠道微生物组的关联。
BMC Vet Res. 2023 Jun 30;19(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12917-023-03636-x.
5
Diet Drives Gut Bacterial Diversity of Wild and Semi-Captive Common Cranes ().饮食驱动野生和半圈养丹顶鹤的肠道细菌多样性
Animals (Basel). 2024 May 25;14(11):1566. doi: 10.3390/ani14111566.
6
Changes in the Diversity and Composition of Gut Microbiota of Red-Crowned Cranes () after Avian Influenza Vaccine and Anthelmintic Treatment.禽流感疫苗和驱虫治疗后丹顶鹤肠道微生物群的多样性和组成变化
Animals (Basel). 2022 May 5;12(9):1183. doi: 10.3390/ani12091183.
7
Breeding records and the detection of nesting predators of wild-release red-crowned cranes into non-breeding areas of the Yancheng National Nature Reserve, China.中国盐城国家级自然保护区非繁殖区野生放归丹顶鹤的繁殖记录及筑巢捕食者的检测
Ecol Evol. 2024 Apr 22;14(4):e11322. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11322. eCollection 2024 Apr.
8
Comparative analysis of the gut bacteria and fungi in migratory demoiselle cranes () and common cranes () in the Yellow River Wetland, China.中国黄河湿地迁徙的凤头麦鸡和普通鹤肠道细菌与真菌的比较分析。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Mar 20;15:1341512. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1341512. eCollection 2024.
9
Lead in the Red-Crowned Cranes (Grus japonensis) in Zhalong Wetland, Northeastern China: A Report.中国东北扎龙湿地丹顶鹤(Grus japonensis)体内的铅:一份报告。
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2016 Aug;97(2):177-83. doi: 10.1007/s00128-016-1853-0. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
10
Characterization of the gut microbiome of black-necked cranes (Grus nigricollis) in six wintering areas in China.中国 6 个越冬地黑颈鹤(Grus nigricollis)肠道微生物组的特征。
Arch Microbiol. 2020 Jul;202(5):983-993. doi: 10.1007/s00203-019-01802-0. Epub 2020 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of fecal microbiota of central and eastern black-necked cranes () wintering in Yunnan Province, China.中国云南省越冬的中部和东部黑颈鹤粪便微生物群的比较分析。
PeerJ. 2025 May 27;13:e19520. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19520. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Modulatory Effect of Gut Microbiota on the Gut-Brain, Gut-Bone Axes, and the Impact of Cannabinoids.肠道微生物群对肠-脑、肠-骨轴的调节作用以及大麻素的影响
Metabolites. 2022 Dec 10;12(12):1247. doi: 10.3390/metabo12121247.
2
Gut microbiome of migratory shorebirds: Current status and future perspectives.候鸟的肠道微生物群:现状与未来展望。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Apr 3;11(9):3737-3745. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7390. eCollection 2021 May.
3
Free-Living, Psychrotrophic Bacteria of the Genus Are Descendants of Pathobionts.该属的自由生活嗜冷细菌是致病共生菌的后代。
mSystems. 2021 Apr 13;6(2):e00258-21. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00258-21.
4
Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Captive and Wild Oriental White Storks: Implications for Conservation Biology.圈养与野生东方白鹳肠道微生物群的比较分析:对保护生物学的启示
Front Microbiol. 2021 Mar 25;12:649466. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.649466. eCollection 2021.
5
Gut microbiota composition and metabolomic profiles of wild and captive Chinese monals (Lophophorus lhuysii).野生和圈养血雉(Lophophorus lhuysii)的肠道微生物群组成和代谢组学特征
Front Zool. 2020 Dec 3;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12983-020-00381-x.
6
Environmental remodeling of human gut microbiota and antibiotic resistome in livestock farms.养殖场中人类肠道微生物组和抗生素耐药组的环境重塑。
Nat Commun. 2020 Mar 18;11(1):1427. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15222-y.
7
Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs)-Mediated Gut Epithelial and Immune Regulation and Its Relevance for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.短链脂肪酸(SCFAs)介导的肠道上皮和免疫调节及其对炎症性肠病的相关性。
Front Immunol. 2019 Mar 11;10:277. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00277. eCollection 2019.
8
Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2's q2-feature-classifier plugin.利用 QIIME 2 的 q2-feature-classifier 插件优化标记基因扩增子序列的分类学分类。
Microbiome. 2018 May 17;6(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z.
9
Comparative analyses of the gut microbiota among three different wild geese species in the genus Anser.对三种不同雁属野鹅肠道微生物群的比较分析。
J Basic Microbiol. 2018 Jun;58(6):543-553. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201800060. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
10
Active migration is associated with specific and consistent changes to gut microbiota in Calidris shorebirds.主动迁徙与滨鹬类鸟类肠道微生物群的特定且一致的变化有关。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Mar;87(2):428-437. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12784. Epub 2017 Dec 18.