Ning Yao, Qi Jinzhe, Dobbins Michael T, Liang Xin, Wang Jingxuan, Chen Shiyu, Ma Jianzhang, Jiang Guangshun
College of Wildlife and Protected Area, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China.
Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jul 24;11:1665. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01665. eCollection 2020.
It has been well acknowledged that the gut microbiome is important for host health, composition changes in these microbial communities might increase susceptibility to infections and reduce adaptability to environment. Reintroduction, as an effective strategy for wild population recovery and genetic diversity maintenance for endangered populations, usually takes captive populations as rewilding resource. While, little is known about the compositional and functional differences of gut microbiota between captive and wild populations, especially for large carnivores, like Amur tiger. In this study, high throughput sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene (amplicon sequencing) and metagenomics were used to analyze the composition and function variations of gut microbiota communities between captive and wild Amur tiger populations based on total 35 fecal samples (13 from captive tigers and 22 from wild tigers). Our results showed that captive Amur tigers have higher alpha diversity in gut microbiota, but that the average unweighted UniFrac distance of bacterial taxa among wild Amur tigers was much larger. The function differences involve most aspects of the body functions, especially for metabolism, environmental information processing, cellular processes, and organismal systems. It was indicated that the diet habit and environment difference between captive and wild populations lead to composition differences of gut microbiota and then resulted in significant differences in functions. These contrasts of functional and compositional variations in gut microbiota between wild and captive Amur tigers are essential insights for guiding conservation management and policy decision-making, and call for more attention on the influence of gut microbiota on the ability of captive animals to survive in the wild.
人们已经充分认识到肠道微生物群对宿主健康很重要,这些微生物群落的组成变化可能会增加感染易感性并降低对环境的适应性。再引入作为野生种群恢复和濒危种群遗传多样性维持的有效策略,通常将圈养种群作为野化资源。然而,对于圈养种群和野生种群之间肠道微生物群的组成和功能差异知之甚少,尤其是对于大型食肉动物,如东北虎。在本研究中,基于总共35份粪便样本(13份来自圈养老虎,22份来自野生老虎),利用16S核糖体RNA(rRNA)基因的高通量测序(扩增子测序)和宏基因组学分析圈养和野生东北虎种群之间肠道微生物群群落的组成和功能变化。我们的结果表明,圈养东北虎的肠道微生物群具有更高的α多样性,但野生东北虎之间细菌类群的平均非加权UniFrac距离要大得多。功能差异涉及身体功能的大多数方面,尤其是代谢、环境信息处理、细胞过程和机体系统。结果表明,圈养种群和野生种群之间的饮食习惯和环境差异导致肠道微生物群的组成差异,进而导致功能上的显著差异。野生和圈养东北虎之间肠道微生物群功能和组成变化的这些差异,对于指导保护管理和政策决策至关重要,并呼吁更多关注肠道微生物群对圈养动物在野外生存能力的影响。