Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Art and Science, Xiangyang, China.
Center for Clinical Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 19;24(12):e39799. doi: 10.2196/39799.
Most patients with cancer experience psychological or physical distress, which can adversely affect their quality of life (QOL). Smartphone app interventions are increasingly being used to improve QOL and psychological outcomes in patients with cancer. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the effect of this type of intervention, with conflicting results in the literature.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the effectiveness of mobile phone app interventions on QOL and psychological outcomes in adult patients with cancer, with a special focus on intervention duration, type of cancer, intervention theory, treatment strategy, and intervention delivery format.
We conducted a literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang to identify studies involving apps that focused on cancer survivors and QOL or psychological symptoms published from inception to October 30, 2022. We selected only randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria and performed systematic review and meta-analysis. The standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% CI was pooled when needed. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also conducted.
In total, 30 randomized controlled trials with a total of 5353 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with routine care, app interventions might improve QOL (SMD=0.39, 95% CI 0.27-0.51; P<.001); enhance self-efficacy (SMD=0.15, 95% CI 0.02-0.29; P=.03); and alleviate anxiety (SMD=-0.64, 95% CI -0.73 to -0.56; P<.001), depression (SMD=-0.33, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.08; P=.009), and distress (SMD=-0.34, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.08; P=.01). Short-term (duration of ≤3 months), physician-patient interaction (2-way communication using a smartphone app), and cognitive behavioral therapy interventions might be the most effective for improving QOL and alleviating adverse psychological effects.
Our study showed that interventions using mobile health apps might improve QOL and self-efficacy as well as alleviate anxiety, depression, and distress in adult cancer survivors. However, these results should be interpreted with caution because of the heterogeneity of the interventions and the study design. More rigorous trials are warranted to confirm the suitable duration and validate the different intervention theories as well as address methodological flaws in previous studies.
PROSPERO CRD42022370599; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=370599.
大多数癌症患者都会经历心理或身体上的痛苦,这会对他们的生活质量(QOL)产生不利影响。智能手机应用程序干预措施正越来越多地被用于改善癌症患者的 QOL 和心理结果。然而,关于这种类型的干预措施的效果,证据不足,文献中的结果存在冲突。
在本系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们研究了移动电话应用程序干预措施对成年癌症患者 QOL 和心理结果的有效性,特别关注干预持续时间、癌症类型、干预理论、治疗策略和干预交付格式。
我们对 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、Scopus、中国国家知识基础设施和万方进行了文献检索,以确定从成立到 2022 年 10 月 30 日为止,专注于癌症幸存者和 QOL 或心理症状的应用程序的研究。我们只选择符合纳入标准的随机对照试验,并进行系统评价和荟萃分析。需要时使用标准化均数差值(SMD)和 95%置信区间进行汇总。还进行了敏感性和亚组分析。
本荟萃分析共纳入 30 项随机对照试验,共 5353 名参与者。与常规护理相比,应用程序干预可能会提高 QOL(SMD=0.39,95%CI 0.27-0.51;P<.001);增强自我效能感(SMD=0.15,95%CI 0.02-0.29;P=.03);缓解焦虑(SMD=-0.64,95%CI -0.73 至 -0.56;P<.001)、抑郁(SMD=-0.33,95%CI -0.58 至 -0.08;P=.009)和痛苦(SMD=-0.34,95%CI -0.61 至 -0.08;P=.01)。短期(持续时间≤3 个月)、医患互动(使用智能手机应用程序进行双向交流)和认知行为疗法干预措施可能最有益于提高 QOL 和缓解不良心理影响。
我们的研究表明,使用移动健康应用程序的干预措施可能会改善成年癌症幸存者的 QOL 和自我效能感,并缓解焦虑、抑郁和痛苦。然而,由于干预措施和研究设计的异质性,这些结果应谨慎解释。需要更严格的试验来证实合适的持续时间,并验证不同的干预理论,并解决先前研究中的方法学缺陷。
PROSPERO CRD42022370599;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=370599。