• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动健康干预措施对减少儿童和青少年身体活动不足和久坐行为的影响:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

mHealth Interventions to Reduce Physical Inactivity and Sedentary Behavior in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Human Movement, Faculty of Psychology and Human Movement Science, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, Institute for Psychology and Occupational Science, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 11;10(5):e35920. doi: 10.2196/35920.

DOI:10.2196/35920
PMID:35544294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9133983/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children and adolescents increasingly do not meet physical activity (PA) recommendations. Hence, insufficient PA (IPA) and sedentary behavior (SB) among children and adolescents are relevant behavior change domains for using individualized mobile health (mHealth) interventions.

OBJECTIVE

This review and meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of mHealth interventions on IPA and SB, with a special focus on the age and level of individualization.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials published between January 2000 and March 2021. mHealth interventions for primary prevention in children and adolescents addressing behavior change related to IPA and SB were included. Included studies were compared for content characteristics and methodological quality and summarized narratively. In addition, a meta-analysis with a subsequent exploratory meta-regression examining the moderating effects of age and individualization on overall effectiveness was performed.

RESULTS

On the basis of the inclusion criteria, 1.3% (11/828) of the preliminary identified studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 1.2% (10/828) were included in the meta-analysis. Trials included a total of 1515 participants (mean age (11.69, SD 0.788 years; 65% male and 35% female) self-reported (3/11, 27%) or device-measured (8/11, 73%) health data on the duration of SB and IPA for an average of 9.3 (SD 5.6) weeks. Studies with high levels of individualization significantly decreased insufficient PA levels (Cohen d=0.33; 95% CI 0.08-0.58; Z=2.55; P=.01), whereas those with low levels of individualization (Cohen d=-0.06; 95% CI -0.32 to 0.20; Z=0.48; P=.63) or targeting SB (Cohen d=-0.11; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.23; Z=1.73; P=.08) indicated no overall significant effect. The heterogeneity of the studies was moderate to low, and significant subgroup differences were found between trials with high and low levels of individualization (χ=4.0; P=.04; I=75.2%). Age as a moderator variable showed a small effect; however, the results were not significant, which might have been because of being underpowered.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggests that mHealth interventions for children and adolescents can foster moderate reductions in IPA but not SB. Moreover, individualized mHealth interventions to reduce IPA seem to be more effective for adolescents than for children. Although, to date, only a few mHealth studies have addressed inactive and sedentary young people, and their quality of evidence is moderate, these findings indicate the relevance of individualization on the one hand and the difficulties in reducing SB using mHealth interventions on the other.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020209417; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=209417.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58df/9133983/b77ea6a9a02f/mhealth_v10i5e35920_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58df/9133983/92f33ea88bd4/mhealth_v10i5e35920_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58df/9133983/d10ebcec5157/mhealth_v10i5e35920_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58df/9133983/ab2bf315d92d/mhealth_v10i5e35920_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58df/9133983/1f14c60f5b2c/mhealth_v10i5e35920_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58df/9133983/2b8ef6c70ca5/mhealth_v10i5e35920_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58df/9133983/b77ea6a9a02f/mhealth_v10i5e35920_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58df/9133983/92f33ea88bd4/mhealth_v10i5e35920_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58df/9133983/d10ebcec5157/mhealth_v10i5e35920_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58df/9133983/ab2bf315d92d/mhealth_v10i5e35920_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58df/9133983/1f14c60f5b2c/mhealth_v10i5e35920_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58df/9133983/2b8ef6c70ca5/mhealth_v10i5e35920_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58df/9133983/b77ea6a9a02f/mhealth_v10i5e35920_fig6.jpg
摘要

背景

儿童和青少年越来越不符合身体活动(PA)的建议。因此,儿童和青少年中不足的 PA(IPA)和久坐行为(SB)是使用个体化移动健康(mHealth)干预措施的相关行为改变领域。

目的

本综述和荟萃分析调查了 mHealth 干预措施对 IPA 和 SB 的有效性,特别关注个体化的年龄和水平。

方法

检索了 2000 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月期间发表的随机对照试验,使用 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、SPORTDiscus 和 Cochrane Library。纳入了针对儿童和青少年初级预防的 mHealth 干预措施,这些干预措施针对与 IPA 和 SB 相关的行为改变。纳入的研究在内容特征和方法学质量方面进行了比较,并进行了叙述性总结。此外,还进行了荟萃分析,随后进行了探索性荟萃回归分析,以检验年龄和个体化对总体效果的调节作用。

结果

根据纳入标准,初步确定的 828 项研究中,有 1.3%(11/828)被纳入定性综合分析,有 1.2%(10/828)被纳入荟萃分析。试验共纳入 1515 名参与者(平均年龄(11.69,SD 0.788 岁;65%为男性,35%为女性)自我报告(3/11,27%)或设备测量(8/11,73%)健康数据,记录 SB 和 IPA 的持续时间,平均为 9.3(SD 5.6)周。高水平个体化的研究显著降低了不足的 PA 水平(Cohen d=0.33;95% CI 0.08-0.58;Z=2.55;P=.01),而低水平个体化的研究(Cohen d=-0.06;95% CI -0.32 至 0.20;Z=0.48;P=.63)或针对 SB(Cohen d=-0.11;95% CI -0.01 至 0.23;Z=1.73;P=.08)则没有总体显著效果。研究的异质性为中等到低,高水平个体化和低水平个体化试验之间存在显著的亚组差异(χ=4.0;P=.04;I=75.2%)。年龄作为一个调节变量显示出较小的影响;然而,结果并不显著,这可能是由于研究的效能不足。

结论

证据表明,针对儿童和青少年的 mHealth 干预措施可以适度促进 IPA 的减少,但不能减少 SB。此外,针对 IPA 减少的个体化 mHealth 干预措施似乎对青少年比儿童更有效。尽管迄今为止,只有少数 mHealth 研究涉及不活跃和久坐的年轻人,而且它们的证据质量为中等,但这些发现表明个体化的相关性,另一方面,使用 mHealth 干预措施减少 SB 的困难。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42020209417;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=209417.

相似文献

1
mHealth Interventions to Reduce Physical Inactivity and Sedentary Behavior in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.移动健康干预措施对减少儿童和青少年身体活动不足和久坐行为的影响:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 11;10(5):e35920. doi: 10.2196/35920.
2
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
3
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.
4
Accuracy and Precision of Consumer-Grade Wearable Activity Monitors for Assessing Time Spent in Sedentary Behavior in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review.消费者级可穿戴活动监测器评估儿童和青少年久坐行为时间的准确性和精密度:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 9;10(8):e37547. doi: 10.2196/37547.
5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Effectiveness of Live Health Professional-Led Group eHealth Interventions for Adult Mental Health: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.生活健康专业人员主导的群组电子健康干预措施对成人心理健康的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 11;24(1):e27939. doi: 10.2196/27939.
7
Effects of Smartphone-Based Interventions on Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.基于智能手机的干预措施对儿童和青少年身体活动的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 1;9(2):e22601. doi: 10.2196/22601.
8
Effect of Mobile Phone App-Based Interventions on Quality of Life and Psychological Symptoms Among Adult Cancer Survivors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.基于手机应用程序的干预对成年癌症幸存者生活质量和心理症状的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 19;24(12):e39799. doi: 10.2196/39799.
9
Assessing the Acceptability and Effectiveness of Mobile-Based Physical Activity Interventions for Midlife Women During Menopause: Systematic Review of the Literature.评估基于移动设备的身体活动干预措施在更年期中年女性中的可接受性和有效性:文献系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Dec 9;10(12):e40271. doi: 10.2196/40271.
10
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.以学校为基础的身体活动计划促进 6 至 18 岁儿童和青少年身体活动和健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 23;9(9):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Planning for the Unexpected and Unintended Effects of mHealth Interventions: Systematic Review.移动健康干预意外及非预期效果的规划:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 7;27:e68909. doi: 10.2196/68909.
2
Effectiveness of mHealth interventions targeting physical activity, sedentary behaviour, sleep or nutrition on emotional, behavioural and eating disorders in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对身体活动、久坐行为、睡眠或营养的移动健康干预措施对青少年情绪、行为和饮食失调的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jul 21;7:1593677. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1593677. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Individualized mobile health interventions for cardiovascular event prevention in patients with coronary heart disease: study protocol for the iCARE randomized controlled trial.个体化移动医疗干预在冠心病患者心血管事件预防中的应用:iCARE 随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jul 13;21(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02153-9.
2
Comparison of Self-Reported and Device-Based Measured Physical Activity Using Measures of Stability, Reliability, and Validity in Adults and Children.比较成年人和儿童使用稳定性、可靠性和有效性测量指标的自我报告和基于设备的身体活动测量。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 10;21(8):2672. doi: 10.3390/s21082672.
3
Gamified digital exercise interventions for children and adolescents: Protocol for a systematic review and behavior change technique analysis.
针对儿童和青少年的游戏化数字运动干预措施:系统评价与行为改变技术分析方案
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 3;11:20552076251365017. doi: 10.1177/20552076251365017. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Pediatrics 4.0: the Transformative Impacts of the Latest Industrial Revolution on Pediatrics.《儿科学4.0:最新工业革命对儿科学的变革性影响》
Health Care Anal. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s10728-025-00536-z.
5
Parents' experiences of family-based physical activity interventions: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.父母对家庭体育活动干预措施的体验:一项系统评价与定性证据综合分析
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Jul 1;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01778-9.
6
Adolescents' Assessment of Several Step Tracker Mobile Applications Based on Their Previous Level of Physical Activity.基于青少年先前身体活动水平对几款步数追踪移动应用程序的评估
Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 25;12(5):554. doi: 10.3390/children12050554.
7
Effectiveness of a Mobile Phone-Delivered Multiple Health Behavior Change Intervention (LIFE4YOUth) in Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial.手机多健康行为改变干预措施(LIFE4YOUth)对青少年的有效性:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 22;27:e69425. doi: 10.2196/69425.
8
Insights into the Technological Evolution and Research Trends of Mobile Health: Bibliometric Analysis.移动健康的技术演变与研究趋势洞察:文献计量分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;13(7):740. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13070740.
9
Effectiveness of wearable activity trackers on physical activity among adolescents in school-based settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.可穿戴活动追踪器对在校青少年身体活动的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):1050. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22170-z.
10
Developing an Evidence- and Theory-Informed Mother-Daughter mHealth Intervention Prototype Targeting Physical Activity in Preteen Girls of Low Socioeconomic Position: Multiphase Co-Design Study.针对社会经济地位较低的青春期前女孩的身体活动,开发一个基于证据和理论的母女移动健康干预原型:多阶段协同设计研究。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2025 Jan 6;8:e62795. doi: 10.2196/62795.
Long-term Effectiveness of mHealth Physical Activity Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
移动健康促进身体活动干预的长期效果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 30;23(4):e26699. doi: 10.2196/26699.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
Personalized mobile technologies for lifestyle behavior change: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.个性化移动技术在生活方式行为改变中的应用:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Prev Med. 2021 Jul;148:106532. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106532. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
6
Effects of Smartphone-Based Interventions on Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.基于智能手机的干预措施对儿童和青少年身体活动的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 1;9(2):e22601. doi: 10.2196/22601.
7
Do smartphone applications and activity trackers increase physical activity in adults? Systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression.智能手机应用程序和活动追踪器能否提高成年人的身体活动量?系统评价、荟萃分析和元回归。
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Apr;55(8):422-432. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102892. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
8
Key facets to build up eHealth and mHealth interventions to enhance physical activity, sedentary behavior and nutrition in healthy subjects - an umbrella review.建立电子健康和移动健康干预措施以促进健康受试者的身体活动、 sedentary behavior 和营养的关键方面 - 伞式综述。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 23;20(1):1605. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09700-7.
9
A systematic review of tailored mHealth interventions for physical activity promotion among adults.一项针对成年人身体活动促进的定制移动健康干预措施的系统评价。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Oct 12;10(5):1221-1232. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz190.
10
Comparison of self-report versus accelerometer - measured physical activity and sedentary behaviors and their association with body composition in Latin American countries.比较自我报告与加速度计测量的身体活动和久坐行为及其与拉丁美洲国家身体成分的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232420. eCollection 2020.