Distinguishing normal, neuropathic and myopathic EMG with an automated machine learning approach.

OBJECTIVE

Distinguishing normal, neuropathic and myopathic electromyography (EMG) traces can be challenging. We aimed to create an automated time series classification algorithm.

METHODS

EMGs of healthy controls (HC, n = 25), patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, n = 20) and inclusion body myositis (IBM, n = 20), were retrospectively selected based on longitudinal clinical follow-up data (ALS and HC) or muscle biopsy (IBM). A machine learning pipeline was applied based on 5-second EMG fragments of each muscle. Diagnostic yield expressed as area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver-operator characteristics curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were determined per muscle (muscle-level) and per patient (patient-level).

RESULTS

Diagnostic yield of the classification ALS vs. HC was: AUC 0.834 ± 0.014 at muscle-level and 0.856 ± 0.009 at patient-level. For the classification HC vs. IBM, AUC was 0.744 ± 0.043 at muscle-level and 0.735 ± 0.029 at patient-level. For the classification ALS vs. IBM, AUC was 0.569 ± 0.024 at muscle-level and 0.689 ± 0.035 at patient-level.

CONCLUSIONS

An automated time series classification algorithm can distinguish EMGs from healthy individuals from those of patients with ALS with a high diagnostic yield. Using longer EMG fragments with different levels of muscle activation may improve performance.

SIGNIFICANCE

In the future, machine learning algorithms may help improve the diagnostic accuracy of EMG examinations.