Translational Biobehavioral and Health Disparities Branch, The National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Clinical Center Nursing Department, The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Nutrients. 2024 Feb 5;16(3):463. doi: 10.3390/nu16030463.
Cooking is an identified dietary strategy that is positively associated with optimal diet quality. Prior to initiating cooking interventions, evaluating the prospective acceptability of the intervention among community members living within low food access areas and understanding geospatial food shopping locations may aid in designing community-tailored interventions.
A sequential mixed methods study was conducted to determine the prospective acceptability of a planned community-located cooking intervention among African American adults living in a low food access area and with at least one cardiovascular disease risk factor. A semi-structured guide was used to conduct five virtual focus groups. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis and validated through participant check-in interviews. Survey responses were analyzed based on descriptive data. Geospatial analysis of participant locations that were reported for food shopping was conducted to show food environment utilization.
Focus groups with study participants (n = 20, all female, mean age 60.3, SD 9.3, mean cooking frequency per week 4.0, food insecure n = 7) were conducted between March and April, 2021. Thematic analysis of the focus group transcripts identified five main themes as follows: (A) Barriers to Cooking (family and caregiving, transportation, COVID-19 pandemic, time availability, household composition); (B) Motivators for Cooking (family, caregiving, health, enjoyment, COVID-19 pandemic); (C) Strategies (food shopping, social support, social media, meal planning); (D) Neighborhood (gentrification, perceived safety, stigmatization, disparities in grocery stores); (E) and Acceptability of the Intervention (reasons to participate, barriers, recruitment, intervention delivery). Participant validation interviews confirmed the themes and subthemes as well as the illustrative quotes. Geospatial analysis showed a majority of locations were outside of the participants' residential areas.
Prospective acceptability of a community-tailored cooking intervention found that the planned intervention could be modified to address individual level factors, such as caregiving and health, community contextual factors, such as perceived safety, and the general health needs of the community.
烹饪是一种已确定的饮食策略,与最佳饮食质量呈正相关。在开展烹饪干预措施之前,评估生活在低食物获取区域的社区成员对干预措施的预期接受程度,并了解地理空间的食物购物地点,可能有助于设计针对社区的干预措施。
本研究采用序贯混合方法,旨在确定针对生活在低食物获取区域且至少存在一个心血管疾病风险因素的非裔美国成年人的社区烹饪干预措施的预期接受程度。使用半结构化指南进行了五次虚拟焦点小组讨论。使用主题分析对定性数据进行分析,并通过参与者确认访谈进行验证。根据描述性数据对调查结果进行分析。对参与者报告的食物购物地点进行地理空间分析,以展示食物环境的利用情况。
2021 年 3 月至 4 月期间,对研究参与者(均为女性,平均年龄 60.3 岁,标准差 9.3 岁,每周烹饪频率平均为 4.0 次,7 人食物不安全)进行了焦点小组讨论。对焦点小组记录的主题分析确定了以下五个主要主题:(A)烹饪障碍(家庭和照顾、交通、COVID-19 大流行、时间可用性、家庭构成);(B)烹饪动机(家庭、照顾、健康、享受、COVID-19 大流行);(C)策略(食物购买、社会支持、社交媒体、膳食计划);(D)邻里环境(高档化、感知安全、污名化、杂货店差异);(E)干预措施的可接受性(参与的原因、障碍、招募、干预措施的提供)。参与者确认访谈证实了主题和子主题以及说明性引语。地理空间分析显示,大多数地点都在参与者的居住区域之外。
针对社区定制烹饪干预措施的预期接受程度研究发现,该计划中的干预措施可以进行修改,以解决个人层面的因素,如照顾和健康,社区背景因素,如感知安全,以及社区的一般健康需求。