Suppr超能文献

使用离体共聚焦激光扫描显微镜对各种皮肤活检进行即时组织学评估的可行性研究。

A Feasibility Study for Immediate Histological Assessment of Various Skin Biopsies Using Ex Vivo Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.

作者信息

Ogrzewalla Hanna, Möhrle Matthias, Metzler Gisela, Eigentler Thomas, Münch Anne-Kristin, Forchhammer Stephan

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Eberhardt Karls Universität, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.

Praxisklinik Haut und Venen, 72072 Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 2;12(12):3030. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12123030.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digitally stained ex vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) scans are a possible alternative to formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) stained slides. This study explores the diagnostic accuracy of digitally-stained CLSM scans in comparison to H&E-stained slides in various dermatologic diseases in a real-life setting.

METHODS

Samples of patients out of one selected dermatologic office were primarily scanned via CLSM; a diagnosis was made afterwards using FFPE- and H&E-stained slides by two experienced dermatopathologists. Primary outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis in digitally stained CLSM scans in three separate diagnostic groups.

RESULTS

CLSM evaluation of epithelial tumors (n = 132) demonstrated a sensitivity of 64.3%/83.9% and a specificity of 84.2%/71.1%. Diagnosis of melanocytic tumors (n = 86) showed a sensitivity of 19.1%/85.1% and a specificity of 96.3%/66.7%. In the diagnosis of other tumors/cysts and inflammatory dermatoses (n = 42), a sensitivity of 96.4%/96.8% and a specificity of 57.1%/45.5% was reached.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the possibilities and limitations of a broad use of CLSM. Because of a partly low diagnostic accuracy, such an application does not seem to be recommendable at present for every indication.

摘要

背景

数字染色的离体共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)扫描可能是福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)和苏木精-伊红(H&E)染色玻片的替代方法。本研究在实际环境中探讨了数字染色的CLSM扫描与H&E染色玻片相比在各种皮肤病中的诊断准确性。

方法

从一个选定的皮肤科诊所选取患者样本,首先通过CLSM进行扫描;随后由两位经验丰富的皮肤病理学家使用FFPE和H&E染色玻片做出诊断。主要结果是在三个独立诊断组中数字染色的CLSM扫描诊断的敏感性和特异性。

结果

CLSM对上皮肿瘤(n = 132)的评估显示敏感性为64.3%/83.9%,特异性为84.2%/71.1%。黑素细胞肿瘤(n = 86)的诊断显示敏感性为19.1%/85.1%,特异性为96.3%/66.7%。在其他肿瘤/囊肿和炎症性皮肤病(n = 42)的诊断中,敏感性为96.4%/96.8%,特异性为57.1%/45.5%。

结论

本研究显示了广泛使用CLSM的可能性和局限性。由于部分诊断准确性较低,目前这种应用似乎并非对每种适应症都推荐。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baee/9777122/20d9e9aaf1b5/diagnostics-12-03030-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验