Martins Ricardo M G, Mazzoli Emiliano, Duncan Michael J, Clark Cain C T, Eyre Emma L J
Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.
Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia.
Children (Basel). 2022 Dec 2;9(12):1896. doi: 10.3390/children9121896.
This online study investigated the acute effects of a cognitively demanding physical activity (CDPA) vs a simple physical activity (SPA) bout on children’s inhibitory and affective responses. Using a counterbalanced within-subjects’ crossover design, thirty-nine participants aged 9−12 years old (29 boys; Mage = 11 ± 1 years) performed a CDPA and a SPA bout online (via ZOOM) for 15 min. Inhibition (Stroop test) was measured at the baseline, 1 and 30 min following the physical activity (PA) bouts, and self-report measures of affect, mental and physical exertion were taken prior, during and post-PA. Additionally, 31 children took part in semi-structured focus groups to explore the factors affecting their enjoyment. The quantitative results suggest no significant differences on inhibitory responses, affect and physical exertion (all p > 0.05). However, the CDPA induced more mental exertion than the SPA did (p < 0.05). In the focus groups, four themes were identified: physical exertion (e.g., tiredness), social (e.g., teams/groups), environment (e.g., outdoors and competition) and emotional (e.g., fun/enjoyment). Some children (n = 18) reported that the CDPA condition confused them, and to make these activities more interesting and enjoyable, they suggested performing the activities outdoors (n = 15) and including other children as part of a group/team (n = 19). The findings suggest no additional benefit of a cognitively enriched physical activity compared to an SPA bout on the inhibitory responses, affect and enjoyment. Using the instructions provided and given the low cost, the easy administration and the minimal amount of equipment and time involved, either of the approaches may be used in a diversity of contexts (i.e., online, schools or outdoors), and it is worth exploring the effects of these conditions on other aspects of executive function.
这项在线研究调查了一项认知要求较高的体育活动(CDPA)与一项简单体育活动(SPA)回合对儿童抑制性和情感反应的急性影响。采用平衡的被试内交叉设计,39名9至12岁的参与者(29名男孩;平均年龄Mage = 11±1岁)通过ZOOM在线进行了15分钟的CDPA和SPA回合。在体育活动(PA)回合前的基线、活动后1分钟和30分钟测量抑制能力(斯特鲁普测试),并在PA之前、期间和之后进行情感、心理和身体 exertion 的自我报告测量。此外,31名儿童参加了半结构化焦点小组,以探索影响他们享受程度的因素。定量结果表明,在抑制反应、情感和身体 exertion 方面没有显著差异(所有p>0.05)。然而,CDPA比SPA引起更多的心理 exertion(p<0.05)。在焦点小组中,确定了四个主题:身体 exertion(如疲劳)、社交(如团队/小组)、环境(如户外和竞争)和情感(如乐趣/享受))。一些儿童(n = )报告说,CDPA条件让他们感到困惑,为了使这些活动更有趣和令人愉快,他们建议在户外进行活动(n = 15)并让其他儿童作为小组/团队的一部分参与(n = 19)。研究结果表明,与SPA回合相比,认知丰富的体育活动在抑制反应、情感和享受方面没有额外的益处。利用所提供的指导说明,鉴于成本低、易于实施且所需设备和时间最少,这两种方法中的任何一种都可用于多种情境(即在线、学校或户外),并且值得探索这些条件对执行功能其他方面的影响。