Institute for Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;19(24):16486. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416486.
The protocol presents a research project that explores the relationship between science and politics in the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of public health (PH) scientists in Germany with situational analysis (SA). In context of this global crisis, we ask how PH scientists negotiate their roles as scientists and political citizens; how PH scientists perceive the relationship between their own and other scientific disciplines; and which normative assumptions PH scientists make in the production and dissemination of research findings. To conduct SA, we combine qualitative interviews with PH experts and published documents from scientific societies in PH and related disciplines (e.g., position and opinion papers) to analyze the complexity of integrating evidence-based knowledge into politics. Data are analyzed using different SA mapping tools, focusing on social worlds/arena maps and positional maps. The approach will reveal both explicit positions in the PH community and implicit or hidden voices and will reflect normative assumptions as well as internal structures of PH in Germany. The findings will be discussed with the philosophy sub-project and in a stakeholder workshop with politicians and the public. Further insights will be gained for politics and PH responses to future global crises.
本方案从德国公共卫生(PH)科学家的角度出发,通过情境分析(SA)方法,研究了 COVID-19 大流行背景下科学与政治之间的关系。在这场全球危机中,我们提出了如下问题:PH 科学家如何在作为科学家和政治公民的角色之间进行协商;PH 科学家如何看待自己学科与其他学科之间的关系;以及 PH 科学家在研究成果的产生和传播中做出了哪些规范性假设。为了进行 SA,我们将 PH 专家的定性访谈与来自 PH 及相关学科的科学学会的已发表文献(例如立场和意见论文)相结合,以分析将循证知识纳入政治的复杂性。我们使用不同的 SA 映射工具对数据进行分析,重点是社会世界/舞台地图和定位地图。该方法不仅将揭示 PH 界内的明确立场,还将反映隐含或隐藏的声音以及 PH 在德国的规范性假设和内部结构。研究结果将与哲学子项目以及与政治家和公众的利益攸关方研讨会进行讨论。我们将进一步深入了解未来全球危机的应对策略。