Department of Orthodox Theology, Faculty of Theology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Department of Internal Medicine and Internal Medicine in Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 7, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;19(24):16573. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416573.
Despite the legal classification of cerebral death as the actual death of a human being and the continuous clarification of neurological criteria, the subject of death, particularly, when exactly it occurs, has been the subject of debate not only in the medical environment but also in other scientific communities for over sixty years. This issue is also present in social discourse. In Poland, as well as in other countries, the concepts of "death" and "cerebral death" have a legal basis. Considerations devoted to death are also important for tanatopedagogics, which focuses primarily on mortality. Indeed, the quality of relationships with other people depends to a large extent on the awareness of death. The study involved 113 pre-specialist physicians employed in various medical centers in Poland. An original questionnaire was used to study the understanding of human death in the light of legal and medical acts that came into force between 2007 and 2019. The study showed that only 7.08% of pre-specialist physicians could fully and correctly identify the basis for declaring a patient dead after diagnosing the irreversible cessation of brain function, and only 33.63% of all respondents understood death in accordance with legal acts currently in force in Poland. Moreover, nearly half of the study participants (47.79%) indicated that irreversible loss of consciousness is not adequate grounds for determining a patient's death, while 56.64% felt that cerebral death is equal to the biological death of a human being. Women were significantly more likely to understand the concept of death ( = 0.028) as defined by current documents and to perceive the irreversible loss of consciousness as an insufficient basis for determining a patient's death ( = 0.040) and also to correctly indicate on what basis cerebral death is identified with human death ( = 0.003), as expressed by current legal regulations in Poland.
尽管脑死亡在法律上被归类为人类的实际死亡,并且神经学标准也在不断得到澄清,但死亡的话题,尤其是它的确切发生时间,不仅在医学领域,而且在其他科学界,已经争论了六十多年。这个问题也存在于社会话语中。在波兰和其他国家,“死亡”和“脑死亡”的概念都有法律依据。对死亡的思考也对专注于死亡的死亡教育学很重要。实际上,与他人的关系质量在很大程度上取决于对死亡的认识。这项研究涉及到波兰各地的 113 名专科医生。研究使用了原始问卷,根据 2007 年至 2019 年生效的法律和医疗法案,研究了人们对人类死亡的理解。研究表明,只有 7.08%的专科医生能够完全正确地识别在诊断出大脑功能不可逆转停止后宣布患者死亡的依据,只有 33.63%的受访者完全按照波兰现行法律法案理解死亡。此外,近一半的研究参与者(47.79%)表示,不可逆转的意识丧失不是确定患者死亡的充分理由,而 56.64%的人认为脑死亡等同于人类的生物学死亡。女性更有可能理解现行文件中定义的死亡概念(=0.028),并认为不可逆转的意识丧失不足以作为确定患者死亡的依据(=0.040),并且还能正确指出脑死亡与人类死亡之间的关系依据(=0.003),这是波兰现行法律规定的。