Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov;48 Suppl 4:S19-S21. doi: 10.1002/hast.946.
Among the old and new controversies over brain death, none is more fundamental than whether brain death is equivalent to the biological phenomenon of human death. Here, I defend this equivalency by offering a brief conceptual justification for this view of brain death, a subject that Andrew Huang and I recently analyzed elsewhere in greater detail. My defense of the concept of brain death has evolved since Bernard Gert, Charles Culver, and I first addressed it in 1981, a development that paralleled advances in intensive care unit treatment. The century-old concept of the organism as a whole provides the fundamental justification for the equivalency of brain death and human death. In our technological age, in which increasing numbers of components and systems of an organism can be kept alive, and for longer intervals, the permanent cessation of functioning of the organism as a whole is the phenomenon that best corresponds to its death.
在脑死亡的新旧争议中,没有什么比脑死亡是否等同于人类死亡的生物学现象更基本的了。在这里,我通过简要地为脑死亡的这种观点提供一个概念性的理由来捍卫这种等同性,我和安德鲁·黄(Andrew Huang)最近在其他地方更详细地分析了这个主题。自 1981 年伯纳德·格特(Bernard Gert)、查尔斯·卡尔弗(Charles Culver)和我首次提出这个概念以来,我对脑死亡概念的辩护已经发展了,这一发展与重症监护病房治疗的进步相平行。作为一个整体的生物体的概念提供了脑死亡和人类死亡等同性的基本理由。在我们这个技术时代,生物体的越来越多的组成部分和系统可以被维持生命,并且维持的时间更长,生物体作为一个整体的功能永久停止是最能对应其死亡的现象。