• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂交通环境下人群预疏散决策的建模与仿真。

Modeling and Simulation of Crowd Pre-Evacuation Decision-Making in Complex Traffic Environments.

机构信息

Department of Transportation, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, No. 1 Zhanlanguan Rd., Beijing 100044, China.

China Academy of Urban Planning Design, No. 9 Sanlihe Rd., Beijing 100044, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 12;19(24):16664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416664.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192416664
PMID:36554545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9779157/
Abstract

Human movements in complex traffic environments have been successfully simulated by various models. It is crucial to improve crowd safety and urban resilience. However, few studies focus on reproducing human behavior and predicting escape reaction time in the initial judgement stage in complex traffic environments. In this paper, a pedestrian pre-evacuation decision-making model considering pedestrian heterogeneity is proposed for complex environments. Firstly, the model takes different obvious factors into account, including cognition, information, experience, habits, stress, and decision-making ability. Then, according to the preference of the escapees, the personnel decision-making in each stage is divided into two types: stay and escape. Finally, multiple influencing factors are selected to construct the regression equation for prediction of the escape opportunity. The results show that: (1) Choices of escape opportunity are divided into several stages, which are affected by the pedestrian individual risk tolerance, risk categories strength, distance from danger, and reaction of the neighborhood crowd. (2) There are many important factors indicating the pedestrian individual risk tolerance, in which Gen, Group, Time and Mode are a positive correlation, while Age and Zone are a negative correlation. (3) The analysis of the natural response rate of different evacuation strategies shows that 19.81% of people evacuate immediately. The research in this paper can better protect public safety and promote the normal activities of the population.

摘要

在复杂的交通环境中,各种模型已经成功地模拟了人类的运动。这对于提高人群安全和城市弹性至关重要。然而,很少有研究关注在复杂交通环境中重现人类行为和预测初始判断阶段的逃生反应时间。本文提出了一种考虑行人异质性的复杂环境下行人预疏散决策模型。首先,该模型考虑了不同的明显因素,包括认知、信息、经验、习惯、压力和决策能力。然后,根据逃生者的偏好,将人员在每个阶段的决策分为停留和逃生两种类型。最后,选择多个影响因素来构建逃生机会的预测回归方程。结果表明:(1)逃生机会的选择分为几个阶段,受到行人个体风险承受能力、风险类别强度、与危险的距离和邻居人群的反应的影响。(2)有许多重要因素表明行人个体风险承受能力,其中 Gen、Group、Time 和 Mode 呈正相关,而 Age 和 Zone 呈负相关。(3)不同疏散策略的自然响应率分析表明,有 19.81%的人立即疏散。本文的研究可以更好地保护公共安全,促进人口的正常活动。

相似文献

1
Modeling and Simulation of Crowd Pre-Evacuation Decision-Making in Complex Traffic Environments.复杂交通环境下人群预疏散决策的建模与仿真。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 12;19(24):16664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416664.
2
Empirical investigation on safety constraints of merging pedestrian crowd through macroscopic and microscopic analysis.宏观和微观分析对行人群体合并安全约束的实证研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Oct;95(Pt B):405-416. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
3
Conceptualizing intragroup and intergroup dynamics within a controlled crowd evacuation.在可控人群疏散中对群体内和群体间动态进行概念化。
J Emerg Manag. 2015 Mar-Apr;13(2):109-20. doi: 10.5055/jem.2015.0224.
4
Modeling pedestrian gap crossing index under mixed traffic condition.混合交通条件下行人间隙穿越指数建模。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
5
Modeling pedestrian behavior in pedestrian-vehicle near misses: A continuous Gaussian Process Inverse Reinforcement Learning (GP-IRL) approach.建模行人和车辆近距离碰撞中的行人行为:一种连续高斯过程逆向强化学习 (GP-IRL) 方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Oct;161:106355. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106355. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
6
Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings.行人-驾驶员在有标记的交叉口的沟通和决策策略。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 May;102:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.018.
7
How people with disabilities influence crowd dynamics of pedestrian movement through bottlenecks.残疾人如何通过瓶颈影响行人流动的人群动态。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 22;12(1):14273. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18142-7.
8
Cross or wait? Pedestrian decision making during clearance phase at signalized intersections.交叉还是等待?信号交叉口清除阶段的行人心智决策。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Feb;111:115-124. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
9
Evacuation of Pedestrians with Two Motion Modes for Panic System.用于恐慌系统的具有两种运动模式的行人疏散
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 7;11(4):e0153388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153388. eCollection 2016.
10
Modeling crowd dynamics through coarse-grained data analysis.通过粗粒度数据分析对人群动态进行建模。
Math Biosci Eng. 2018 Dec 1;15(6):1271-1290. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018059.

本文引用的文献

1
Disentangling the impact of social groups on response times and movement dynamics in evacuations.解析社会群体对疏散响应时间和运动动态的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0121227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121227. eCollection 2015.
2
How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters.简单规则如何决定行人行为和人群灾难。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 26;108(17):6884-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016507108. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
3
Dynamics of crowd disasters: an empirical study.群体灾难的动态:一项实证研究。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Apr;75(4 Pt 2):046109. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.046109. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
4
Rough set approach for accident chains exploration.用于事故链探索的粗糙集方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 May;39(3):629-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.10.009. Epub 2006 Dec 12.