Department of Mathematics, Stockholm University, Albanovägen 28, 11419 Stockholm, Sweden.
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Molecular Microbiology (Virology), University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 17;19(24):16996. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416996.
SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was reported as substantially increased in medical personnel and decreased in smokers after the first wave in spring 2020, including in our population-based Tirschenreuth Study (TiKoCo). However, it is unclear whether these associations were limited to the early pandemic and whether the decrease in smokers was due to reduced infection or antibody response. We evaluated the association of occupation and smoking with period-specific seropositivity: for the first wave until July 2020 (baseline, BL), the low infection period in summer (follow-up 1, FU1, November 2020), and the second/third wave (FU2, April 2021). We measured binding antibodies directed to SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein (N), viral spike protein (S), and neutralizing antibodies at BL, FU1, and FU2. Previous infection, vaccination, smoking, and occupation were assessed by questionnaires. The 4181 participants (3513/3374 at FU1/FU2) included 6.5% medical personnel and 20.4% current smokers. At all three timepoints, new seropositivity was higher in medical personnel with ORs = 1.99 (95%-CI = 1.36-2.93), 1.41 (0.29-6.80), and 3.17 (1.92-5.24) at BL, FU1, and FU2, respectively, and nearly halved among current smokers with ORs = 0.47 (95%-CI = 0.33-0.66), 0.40 (0.09-1.81), and 0.56 (0.33-0.94). Current smokers compared to never-smokers had similar antibody levels after infection or vaccination and reduced odds of a positive SARS-CoV-2 result among tested. Our data suggest that decreased seroprevalence among smokers results from fewer infections rather than reduced antibody response. The persistently higher infection risk of medical staff across infection waves, despite improved means of protection over time, underscores the burden for health care personnel.
SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性率在 2020 年春季第一波疫情后报告在医务人员中显著增加,在我们的基于人群的 Tirschenreuth 研究(TiKoCo)中也是如此,而在吸烟者中则降低。然而,这些关联是否仅限于早期大流行尚不清楚,吸烟者的减少是否是由于感染减少还是抗体反应降低所致。我们评估了职业和吸烟与特定时期血清阳性率的关联:对于第一波疫情直至 2020 年 7 月(基线,BL)、夏季低感染期(随访 1,FU1,2020 年 11 月)和第二/第三波疫情(FU2,2021 年 4 月)。我们在 BL、FU1 和 FU2 时测量了针对 SARS-CoV-2 核蛋白(N)、病毒刺突蛋白(S)和中和抗体的结合抗体。通过问卷调查评估了既往感染、接种疫苗、吸烟和职业情况。4181 名参与者(FU1/FU2 时的 3513/3374 名)包括 6.5%的医务人员和 20.4%的当前吸烟者。在所有三个时间点,医务人员的新血清阳性率均较高,OR 值分别为 1.99(95%CI=1.36-2.93)、1.41(0.29-6.80)和 3.17(1.92-5.24),当前吸烟者的新血清阳性率降低了近一半,OR 值分别为 0.47(95%CI=0.33-0.66)、0.40(0.09-1.81)和 0.56(0.33-0.94)。与从不吸烟者相比,当前吸烟者在感染或接种疫苗后的抗体水平相似,但在接受检测的人中,SARS-CoV-2 检测结果阳性的几率降低。我们的数据表明,吸烟者血清阳性率降低是由于感染减少,而不是抗体反应降低所致。尽管随着时间的推移保护措施有所改善,但医务人员在各波疫情中的感染风险持续居高不下,这凸显了医疗保健人员的负担。