Kim Eung-Yeol, Wada Junichiro, Sakamoto Kazuki, Ishioka Yurika, Arai Yuki, Murakami Natsuko, Yamazaki Toshiki, Hayama Hironari, Utsumi Miona, Inukai Shusuke, Wakabayashi Noriyuki
Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University-TMDU, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Department of Biomaterials Science, Turku Clinical Biomaterials Centre-TCBC, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4B, 20520 Turku, Finland.
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 13;11(24):7392. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247392.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of scanning origin location on the data accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) abutment teeth region in digital impressions acquired by an intraoral scanner. A mandibular partially edentulous model including the following target abutment teeth was used: the left second molar (#37); left first premolar (#34); and right second premolar (#45). The following scanning strategies were tested: the strategy starting from #37 to mesial direction (37M); strategies starting from #34 to mesial (34M) and distal directions (34D), and strategies starting from #45 to mesial (45M) and distal directions (45D). The evaluated measures were trueness, precision, and linear accuracy. One-way and two-way ANOVA were performed for the comparison of trueness and linear accuracy, while Kruskal-Wallis test was performed for the precision comparison (α = 0.05). 45M and 45D showed significantly superior trueness of #34 to 37M and 34D. 45M also showed significantly superior trueness of #45 to 34. 45D showed significantly inferior linear accuracy of #34 and superior linear accuracy of #45 compared to other strategies. It was concluded that scanning origin location would have an impact on data accuracy of RPD abutment teeth region in digital impressions acquired by intraoral scanner.
本研究的目的是调查扫描起始位置对口腔内扫描仪获取的数字化印模中可摘局部义齿(RPD)基牙区域数据准确性的影响。使用了一个下颌部分牙列缺失模型,包括以下目标基牙:左侧第二磨牙(#37);左侧第一前磨牙(#34);以及右侧第二前磨牙(#45)。测试了以下扫描策略:从#37开始向近中方向扫描的策略(37M);从#34开始向近中(34M)和远中方向(34D)扫描的策略,以及从#45开始向近中(45M)和远中方向(45D)扫描的策略。评估指标为真实性、精密度和线性准确性。采用单因素和双因素方差分析对真实性和线性准确性进行比较,采用Kruskal-Wallis检验对精密度进行比较(α = 0.05)。45M和45D显示#34的真实性显著优于37M和34D。45M还显示#45的真实性显著优于34。与其他策略相比,45D显示#34的线性准确性显著较差,而#45的线性准确性较高。得出的结论是,扫描起始位置会对口腔内扫描仪获取的数字化印模中RPD基牙区域的数据准确性产生影响。