Bonanad Clara, Formiga Francesc, Anguita Manuel, Petidier Roberto, Gullón Alejandra
Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (INCLIVA), 46010 Valencia, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 14;11(24):7423. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247423.
Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the most common arrhythmia in older patients. Although direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are the antithrombotic treatment of choice, irrespective of age, certain factors may limit their use. The aim of the ACONVENIENCE study was to consult the opinion of a multidisciplinary panel of experts on the appropriateness of using OACs in elderly patients (>75 years) with NVAF associated with certain complex clinical conditions. A consensus project was performed on the basis of a systematic review of the literature, and application of a two-round Delphi survey. The agreement of 79 panellists on 30 Delphi-type statements was evaluated, and their opinion on the appropriateness of different oral anticoagulants in 16 complex clinical scenarios was assessed. A total of 27 consensus statements were agreed upon, including all statements addressing anticoagulation in older patients and in patients at high risk of bleeding complications, and most of those addressing frailty, dementia, risk of falling, and complex cardiac situations. It was almost unanimously agreed upon that advanced age should not influence the anticoagulation decision. Apixaban was the highest-rated therapeutic option in 14/16 situations, followed by edoxaban. There is a high degree of agreement on anticoagulation in older patients with NVAF. Age should not be the single limiting factor when prescribing OACs, and the decision should be made based on net clinical benefit and a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Apixaban, followed by edoxaban, was considered the most appropriate treatment in the various complex clinical situations examined.
非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)是老年患者中最常见的心律失常。尽管直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)是抗血栓治疗的首选,且与年龄无关,但某些因素可能会限制其使用。ACONVENIENCE研究的目的是就老年(>75岁)NVAF合并某些复杂临床情况的患者使用口服抗凝剂(OAC)的适宜性咨询多学科专家小组的意见。在对文献进行系统综述并应用两轮德尔菲调查的基础上开展了一项共识项目。评估了79名小组成员对30条德尔菲式陈述的一致性,并评估了他们对16种复杂临床情况下不同口服抗凝剂适宜性的看法。总共达成了27条共识陈述,包括所有涉及老年患者和出血并发症高风险患者抗凝的陈述,以及大多数涉及虚弱、痴呆、跌倒风险和复杂心脏情况的陈述。几乎一致认为高龄不应影响抗凝决策。在14/16种情况下,阿哌沙班是评分最高的治疗选择,其次是依度沙班。对于老年NVAF患者的抗凝问题存在高度共识。在开具OAC时,年龄不应是唯一的限制因素,而应根据净临床获益和全面的老年医学评估做出决策。在各种检查的复杂临床情况下,阿哌沙班其次是依度沙班被认为是最合适的治疗方法。