Su Yu-Chi, Hsieh Pei-Chun, Guo Yao-Hong, Lin Yu-Ching
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.
Life (Basel). 2022 Dec 6;12(12):2037. doi: 10.3390/life12122037.
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is characterized by pain, limited range of motion, swelling, skin changes, vasomotor instability, and patchy bone demineralization. Conservative management strategies for CRPS include physical and occupational therapy, psychosocial and behavioral therapy, and pharmacotherapy. However, some patients still experience CRPS symptoms after receiving conventional treatments. Therefore, botulinum toxin (BoNT) has been applied to patients with CRPS in several trials considering its analgesic effect in musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain; however, the results were controversial. We conducted the study to explore the effectiveness and safety of BoNT in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). A search was performed using the following electronic databases up to 19 October 2022: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. We included both randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized controlled studies involving patients with complex regional pain syndrome managed with botulinum toxin. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist were used for quality assessment for randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies. Only randomized controlled trials entered the meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale of pain presented as a weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The secondary outcome was the risk of adverse events presented as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI. We analyzed eight articles with 176 patients, including three randomized controlled trials with 62 participants. The age of the patients ranged from 23.8 to 51 years old. The duration of the disease ranged from 2.2 to 11.8 years. The proportion of females ranged from 16.6% to 100%. The route of administration of BoNT included: (1) lumbar sympathetic block (LSB), (2) intramuscular injection, (3) subcutaneous or intradermal injection (SC/ID). Improvement in pain was revealed in six studies, and adverse events were all self-limited and temporary. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in pain at the first follow-up between 3 weeks to 1 month after intervention (WMD, -1.036, 95% CI, -1.673 to -0.400) but not at the second follow-up between 2 to 3 months after treatment (WMD, -0.895, 95% CI, -2.249 to 0.458). Subgroup analyses between LSB and SC/ID were nonsignificant at both follow-up periods ( = 0.422, 0.139). The risk of adverse events was similar between the BoNT and control group (OR, 0.698, 95% CI, 0.136 to 3.581). In conclusion, BoNT may be effective and safe for alleviating pain in patients with CRPS. However, we could not draw definite conclusions due to small sample size and high between-study heterogeneity. The limited number of participants may conceal the possibility of serious adverse events. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to delineate the role of BoNT in CRPS.
复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)的特征为疼痛、活动范围受限、肿胀、皮肤改变、血管运动不稳定以及局部骨质脱矿。CRPS的保守治疗策略包括物理治疗和职业治疗、心理社会及行为治疗以及药物治疗。然而,一些患者在接受常规治疗后仍会出现CRPS症状。因此,考虑到肉毒毒素(BoNT)对肌肉骨骼和神经性疼痛的镇痛作用,已在多项试验中将其应用于CRPS患者;然而,结果存在争议。我们开展本研究以探讨BoNT治疗复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)患者的有效性和安全性。截至2022年10月19日,使用以下电子数据库进行了检索:PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。我们纳入了涉及使用肉毒毒素治疗的复杂性区域疼痛综合征患者的随机对照试验和非随机对照研究。Cochrane偏倚风险工具和乔安娜·布里格斯研究所批判性评价清单用于随机对照试验和准实验研究的质量评估。仅随机对照试验纳入荟萃分析。主要结局是疼痛视觉模拟量表,以加权均数差(WMD)和95%置信区间(CI)表示。次要结局是不良事件风险,以比值比(OR)和95%CI表示。我们分析了8篇文章,共176例患者,其中包括3项随机对照试验,共62名参与者。患者年龄在23.8至51岁之间。病程在2.2至11.8年之间。女性比例在16.6%至100%之间。BoNT的给药途径包括:(1)腰交感神经阻滞(LSB),(2)肌肉注射,(3)皮下或皮内注射(SC/ID)。6项研究显示疼痛有改善,且不良事件均为自限性和暂时性。荟萃分析显示,干预后3周内至1个月的首次随访时疼痛显著减轻(WMD,-1.036,95%CI,-1.673至-0.400),但治疗后2至3个月的第二次随访时未减轻(WMD,-0.895,95%CI,-2.249至0.458)。LSB和SC/ID之间的亚组分析在两个随访期均无显著差异( = 0.422,0.139)。BoNT组和对照组之间不良事件风险相似(OR,0.698,95%CI,0.136至3.581)。总之,BoNT可能对减轻CRPS患者的疼痛有效且安全。然而,由于样本量小和研究间异质性高,我们无法得出明确结论。参与者数量有限可能掩盖了严重不良事件的可能性。有必要进一步开展大规模随机对照试验以明确BoNT在CRPS中的作用。