Tetz George, Tetz Victor
Human Microbiology Institute, New York, NY 100141, USA.
Microorganisms. 2022 Nov 30;10(12):2383. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122383.
Conventional antimicrobial susceptibility tests, including phenotypic and genotypic methods, are insufficiently accurate and frequently fail to identify effective antibiotics. These methods predominantly select therapies based on the antibiotic response of only the lead bacterial pathogen within pure bacterial culture. However, this neglects the fact that, in the majority of human infections, the lead bacterial pathogens are present as a part of multispecies communities that modulate the response of these lead pathogens to antibiotics and that multiple pathogens can contribute to the infection simultaneously. This discrepancy is a major cause of the failure of antimicrobial susceptibility tests to detect antibiotics that are effective in vivo. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the factors that are missed by conventional antimicrobial susceptibility tests and it explains how accounting for these methods can aid the development of novel diagnostic approaches.
包括表型和基因型方法在内的传统抗菌药敏试验准确性不足,常常无法识别有效的抗生素。这些方法主要基于纯细菌培养物中主要细菌病原体的抗生素反应来选择治疗方法。然而,这忽略了一个事实,即在大多数人类感染中,主要细菌病原体是以多物种群落的一部分存在的,这些群落会调节这些主要病原体对抗生素的反应,并且多种病原体可能同时导致感染。这种差异是抗菌药敏试验未能检测出体内有效抗生素的主要原因。这篇综述文章全面概述了传统抗菌药敏试验遗漏的因素,并解释了考虑这些因素如何有助于开发新的诊断方法。