Elhini Sahar H, Wahsh Engy A, Elberry Ahmed A, El Ameen Nadia F, Abdelfadil Saedii Ahmed, Refaie Shereen Mahmoud, Elsayed Asmaa A, Rabea Hoda M
Diabetes and Endocrinology Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia 61111, Egypt.
Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, October 6 University, Giza 12525, Egypt.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Dec 5;15(12):1516. doi: 10.3390/ph15121516.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is related to metabolic syndrome via insulin resistance, where preventing disease progression is crucial in the management process. The study included 240 NAFLD patients with type 2 diabetes who were randomly allocated into empagliflozin 25 mg (EMPA group), ursodeoxycholic acid 250 mg (UDCA group), or the control group (placebo). The study outcomes included: changes in liver fat content (LFC; %) (utilizing the Dixon-based MRI-PDFF approach), liver enzymes, lipid and glycemic profiles, FIB-4 index, and non-alcoholic fatty liver score (NFS). All endpoints were assessed at baseline and after 6 months. EMPA outperformed UDCA and placebo in decreasing LFC (−8.73% vs. −5.71% vs. −1.99%; p < 0.0001). In post-treatment ultrasound images and MRI-PDFF calculations, more patients had normal fatty liver grade (no steatosis or LFC < 6.5%) with EMPA compared to UDCA. EMPA and UDCA showed significant regression in the FIB-4 index (−0.34 vs. −0.55; p = 0.011) and NFS scores (−1.00 vs. −1.11; p = 0.392), respectively. UDCA achieved higher reductions in insulin resistance than EMPA (p = 0.03); however, only EMPA significantly increased beta-cell function (54.20; p = 0.03). When exploring the differences between the two drugs, EMPA was better in decreasing LFC (%), while UDCA achieved higher reductions in liver fibrosis scores. Both showed a similar safety profile in managing liver steatosis.
非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)通过胰岛素抵抗与代谢综合征相关,在管理过程中预防疾病进展至关重要。该研究纳入了240例2型糖尿病的NAFLD患者,他们被随机分为恩格列净25毫克组(EMPA组)、熊去氧胆酸250毫克组(UDCA组)或对照组(安慰剂组)。研究结果包括:肝脏脂肪含量(LFC;%)的变化(采用基于狄克逊法的MRI-PDFF方法)、肝酶、血脂和血糖谱、FIB-4指数以及非酒精性脂肪肝评分(NFS)。所有终点均在基线和6个月后进行评估。在降低LFC方面,EMPA优于UDCA和安慰剂(-8.73% vs. -5.71% vs. -1.99%;p < 0.0001)。在治疗后的超声图像和MRI-PDFF计算中,与UDCA相比,接受EMPA治疗的更多患者脂肪肝分级正常(无脂肪变性或LFC < 6.5%)。EMPA和UDCA分别在FIB-4指数(-0.34 vs. -0.55;p = 0.011)和NFS评分(-1.00 vs. -1.11;p = 0.392)方面显示出显著改善。UDCA在降低胰岛素抵抗方面比EMPA更显著(p = 0.03);然而,只有EMPA显著增加了β细胞功能(54.20;p = 0.03)。在探究两种药物之间的差异时,EMPA在降低LFC(%)方面表现更好,而UDCA在降低肝纤维化评分方面更显著。两者在管理肝脂肪变性方面显示出相似的安全性。