Suppr超能文献

多种职业健康风险评估模型在空调密闭车间正己烷职业健康风险预测中的应用。

Application of multiple occupational health risk assessment models in the prediction of occupational health risks of n-Hexane in the air-conditioned closed workshop.

机构信息

Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;10:1017718. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1017718. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

n-Hexane (NH) poisoning is a common occupational poisoning in the hardware and electronics industries. However, there is few research data on risk assessment of positions using NH in enclosed workshops. It is very important to assess the risk level of these positions and put forward effective measures and suggestions.

METHODS

The information of selected companies and air samples were collected through on-site investigation, and data collation and sample testing were carried out according to the requirements of Chinese standards. The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Essential, the EPA non-carcinogenic risk assessment model, the Singapore exposure index method and the Chinese semi-quantitative risk assessment models were used to assess the risks of NH.

RESULTS

The working hours of the exposure groups, printing groups and packing groups all exceeded 9 h per day, less than 30% of each similar exposure groups (SEG) was equipped with the local exhaust ventilation, and 11.1% of the cleaning group and 8.3% of the printing group had NH concentrations in the air that exceeded the Chinese occupational exposure limit (OEL). In the EPA non-carcinogenic risk assessment model, each SEG was evaluated at high risk. In the Chinese semi-quantitative risk assessment models, all of the work groups of exposure groups, 91.7% of the work groups of printing groups, 77.8% of the work groups of printing groups, and 57.1% of the work groups of printing groups were evaluated at unacceptable risk. More than 40.0% of the work groups of printing groups and cleaning groups and over 20.0% of the work groups of exposure groups and packing groups were evaluated at high risk in the Chinese semi-quantitative risk assessment models.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese exposure index method and the synthesis index method may have a stronger practicability. Some work groups that use NH in air-conditioned enclosed workshops in China, especially the cleaning groups, are still in a high-risk state. It is necessary to increase protective measures and strengthen occupational hygiene management to reduce risks.

摘要

背景

正己烷(NH)中毒是硬件和电子行业常见的职业中毒。然而,关于在封闭车间使用 NH 的岗位风险评估的研究数据很少。评估这些岗位的风险水平并提出有效措施和建议非常重要。

方法

通过现场调查收集选定公司的信息和空气样本,并按照中国标准的要求进行数据整理和样品检测。使用控制物质危害健康(COSHH)基本要求、美国环保署非致癌风险评估模型、新加坡暴露指数法和中国半定量风险评估模型评估 NH 的风险。

结果

暴露组、印刷组和包装组的工作时间均超过每天 9 小时,不到每个类似暴露组(SEG)的 30%配备局部排气通风,11.1%的清洁组和 8.3%的印刷组空气中的 NH 浓度超过中国职业接触限值(OEL)。在 EPA 非致癌风险评估模型中,每个 SEG 都被评估为高风险。在中国式半定量风险评估模型中,暴露组的所有工作组、91.7%的印刷组工作组、77.8%的包装组工作组和 57.1%的包装组工作组均被评估为不可接受的风险。印刷组和清洁组超过 40.0%的工作组以及暴露组和包装组超过 20.0%的工作组在中国式半定量风险评估模型中被评估为高风险。

结论

中国暴露指数法和综合指数法可能具有更强的实用性。在中国空调封闭车间使用 NH 的一些工作组,尤其是清洁组,仍处于高风险状态。有必要增加防护措施,加强职业卫生管理,降低风险。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Solvent exposure and cognitive function in automotive technicians.汽车技术人员的溶剂暴露与认知功能
Neurotoxicology. 2016 Dec;57:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验