Suppr超能文献

福西特标准在理论评估中的应用。

Application of Fawcett's Criteria in Theory Evaluation.

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Cape Breton University, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Nurs Sci Q. 2023 Jan;36(1):58-63. doi: 10.1177/08943184221131966.

Abstract

Nursing informatics is an emergent field of practice, as are the conceptual and theoretical frameworks that underpin research in this field of practice. In research, theoretical frameworks serve as structured roadmaps that connect various concepts and propositions in a field of study. Therefore, building theoretical frameworks in nursing informatics requires evaluating relevant knowledge from other disciplines that intersect with nursing informatics to justify its relevance and applicability. Fawcett's criteria provide feasible approaches for evaluating middle-range theory. Consequently, the prominent health program framework popularly referred to as the Donabedian Healthcare Quality Framework is significant to nursing informatics research and projects.

摘要

护理信息学是一个新兴的实践领域,其概念和理论框架也是如此,这些框架是该实践领域研究的基础。在研究中,理论框架是连接研究领域中各种概念和命题的结构化路线图。因此,在护理信息学中构建理论框架需要评估与护理信息学交叉的其他学科的相关知识,以证明其相关性和适用性。Fawcett 的标准为评估中级理论提供了可行的方法。因此,广受欢迎的健康计划框架,即通常所说的 Donabedian 医疗保健质量框架,对护理信息学研究和项目具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Application of Fawcett's Criteria in Theory Evaluation.
Nurs Sci Q. 2023 Jan;36(1):58-63. doi: 10.1177/08943184221131966.
2
Cognitive Continuum Theory in nursing decision-making.
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Feb;49(4):397-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03303.x.
3
A critique of Fawcett's 'Conceptual models and nursing practice: the reciprocal relationship'.
J Adv Nurs. 1993 Apr;18(4):558-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18040558.x.
5
Criteria for evaluation of theory.
Nurs Sci Q. 2005 Apr;18(2):131-5. doi: 10.1177/0894318405274823.
6
A virtual dissemination framework to inform and evaluate a neonatal project ECHO (NeoECHO).
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Jul;80(7):2977-2987. doi: 10.1111/jan.15986. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
7
Parse's criteria for evaluation of theory with a comparison of Fawcett's and Parse's approaches.
Nurs Sci Q. 2005 Apr;18(2):135-7; discussion 137. doi: 10.1177/0894318405275860.
8
Geropalliative Caring Model analysis and assessment according to Fawcett's criteria.
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024 Feb 23;57:e20230288. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0288en. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing the InterRAI Assessment Tool in Care Planning Processes for Long-Term Residents: A Scoping Review.
Clin Nurs Res. 2022 Jan;31(1):5-19. doi: 10.1177/10547738211020373. Epub 2021 May 30.
2
Using data for improvement.
BMJ. 2019 Feb 15;364:l189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l189.
3
Theory Development Strategies for Middle-Range Theories.
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2018 Jul/Sep;41(3):275-292. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000215.
4
Technology and its ethics in nursing and caring journals: An integrative literature review.
Nurs Ethics. 2015 Aug;22(5):561-76. doi: 10.1177/0969733014549881. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
5
The (dis)unity of nursing science.
Nurs Philos. 2014 Oct;15(4):250-60. doi: 10.1111/nup.12062. Epub 2014 May 23.
6
Using the Donabedian framework to examine the quality and safety of nursing service innovation.
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jan;23(1-2):145-55. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12146. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
7
8
Assessing bias: the importance of considering confounding.
Evid Based Spine Care J. 2012 Feb;3(1):9-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1298595.
9
The Karen instruments for measuring quality of nursing care: construct validity and internal consistency.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Jun;23(3):292-301. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq092. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
10
The Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set 2.0 quality indicators: a systematic review.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun 16;10:166. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-166.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验