Fitzgerald J L, Mulford H A
Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.
J Stud Alcohol. 1987 May;48(3):207-11. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1987.48.207.
Two possible sources of the substantial gap usually found between survey self-reported alcohol consumption estimates for a population and estimates based on official alcohol sales records are investigated. A measure of atypical heavy drinking is added to ordinary consumption commonly measured in surveys, and consumption by an adolescent (age 14-17) sample is added to that of the adult sample. The relationship between respondents' purchases and consumption during a 30-day period is also investigated. Personal interviews were completed with a random sample of 997 adults and 182 adolescents in Iowa during February-April 1985. Adding atypical drinking to ordinary drinking narrowed the sales-self-report gap more than did adding adolescent drinking, but a considerable gap remained. Self-reported purchases were closer to sales than was self-reported consumption. However, not all purchasers were drinkers and not all drinkers were purchasers, and the two were not highly correlated. The self-report validity issue, which remains unresolved, is apparently affected by many factors. Self-reports appear to be accurate enough for some purposes but not for others. Official alcohol sales (or purchase) records are not necessarily valid measures of alcohol consumption.
本文对通常在人群调查自我报告的酒精消费估计值与基于官方酒精销售记录的估计值之间存在的显著差距的两个可能来源进行了调查。在调查中通常测量的普通消费量中增加了非典型重度饮酒的衡量指标,并将青少年(14 - 17岁)样本的消费量加入到成人样本中。还研究了受访者在30天内的购买量与消费量之间的关系。1985年2月至4月期间,对爱荷华州997名成年人和182名青少年的随机样本进行了个人访谈。将非典型饮酒量加入普通饮酒量比加入青少年饮酒量更能缩小销售 - 自我报告差距,但仍存在相当大的差距。自我报告的购买量比自我报告的消费量更接近销售量。然而,并非所有购买者都是饮酒者,也并非所有饮酒者都是购买者,两者之间的相关性并不高。尚未解决的自我报告有效性问题显然受到许多因素的影响。自我报告对于某些目的似乎足够准确,但对于其他目的则不然。官方酒精销售(或购买)记录不一定是酒精消费的有效衡量指标。