Suppr超能文献

系统可用性量表的翻译和验证到荷兰语版本:D-SUS。

Translation and validation of the System Usability Scale to a Dutch version: D-SUS.

机构信息

Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Department of Sensorimotor Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jan;46(2):395-400. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2160837. Epub 2022 Dec 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The System Usability Scale (SUS) is the most commonly used questionnaire to assess usability of healthcare innovations but is not available in Dutch (D-SUS). This study aims to translate the SUS to Dutch and to determine its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity in healthcare innovations focused on rehabilitation technologies.

METHODS

Translation of the SUS was performed according to the WHO recommendations. Fifty-four participants filled out the D-SUS and Dutch Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (D-QUEST) twice. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by Gwet's agreement coefficient (Gwet's AC2) on item scale, and Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) for the overall D-SUS scores. Construct validity was assessed with the PCC between the D-SUS and D-QUEST overall scores (Netherlands Trial Register, ID: NL9169).

RESULTS

After translation, Cronbach's alpha was 0.74. Gwet's AC2 was 0.68 and the PCC between the first and second overall D-SUS scores was 0.75. No significant difference in D-SUS score between the two measurements was found. Repeatability coefficient was 18.4. The PCC between the D-SUS and D-QUEST overall scores was 0.49.

CONCLUSIONS

The D-SUS is a valid and reliable tool for usability assessment of healthcare innovations, specifically rehabilitation technologies.

摘要

目的

系统可用性量表(SUS)是评估医疗保健创新可用性最常用的问卷,但在荷兰没有可用的版本(D-SUS)。本研究旨在将 SUS 翻译成荷兰语,并确定其在专注于康复技术的医疗保健创新中的内部一致性、重测信度和结构有效性。

方法

根据世界卫生组织的建议对 SUS 进行翻译。54 名参与者两次填写 D-SUS 和荷兰魁北克辅助技术满意度问卷(D-QUEST)。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha 评估。重测信度通过项目量表上的 Gwet 一致性系数(Gwet's AC2)和总体 D-SUS 评分的 Pearson 相关系数(PCC)进行评估。结构有效性通过 D-SUS 和 D-QUEST 总体评分之间的 PCC 进行评估(荷兰临床试验注册中心,ID:NL9169)。

结果

翻译后,Cronbach's alpha 为 0.74。Gwet's AC2 为 0.68,第一次和第二次总体 D-SUS 评分之间的 PCC 为 0.75。两次测量的 D-SUS 评分无显著差异。重复性系数为 18.4。D-SUS 和 D-QUEST 总体评分之间的 PCC 为 0.49。

结论

D-SUS 是一种用于评估医疗保健创新(特别是康复技术)可用性的有效且可靠的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验