• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后移植物下沉的危险因素。

Risk Factors for Allograft Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2023 Feb;170:e700-e711. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.11.109. Epub 2022 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.11.109
PMID:36574570
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose this study was to precisely characterize patterns of allograft subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) utilizing computed tomography scans, determine risk factors for cervical allograft subsidence, and investigate the impact of subsidence on pseudarthrosis rates.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing 1-to 3-level ACDF utilizing allograft interbodies with anterior plating between 2011 and 2019. Subsidence measurements were performed by 2 independent reviewers on computed tomography scans obtained 6 months postoperatively. Subsidence was then classified as mild if subsidence into the inferior and superior endplates were both ≤2 mm, moderate if the worst subsidence into the inferior- or superior endplate was between 2 and 4 mm, or severe if the worst subsidence into the inferior- or superior endplate was ≥4 mm. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for the development of subsidence.

RESULTS

We identified 98 patients (152 levels) for inclusion. A total of 73 levels demonstrated mild subsidence (≤2 mm), 61 demonstrated moderate subsidence (2-4 mm), and 18 demonstrated severe subsidence (≥4 mm). On multivariate analysis, risk factors for severe subsidence included excessive vertebral endplate resection and lower screw tip to vertebral body height ratio. Severe subsidence was associated with an increased rate of pseudarthrosis (94.1% vs. 13.6%) without an associated increase in reoperation rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Following ACDF with allograft interbodies, 50% of interbodies will subside >2 mm and 10% of interbodies will subside >4 mm. Risk factors for severe subsidence should be mitigated to decrease the risk of pseudarthrosis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过计算机断层扫描精确描述颈椎前路融合术(ACDF)后移植物沉降的模式,确定移植物沉降的危险因素,并探讨沉降对假关节形成率的影响。

方法

我们对 2011 年至 2019 年间接受 1-3 个节段 ACDF 且使用异体椎间融合器和前路钢板的患者进行了回顾性研究。术后 6 个月通过计算机断层扫描对沉降进行测量。沉降分为轻度(下、上终板沉降均≤2mm)、中度(下或上终板沉降最差处为 2-4mm)和重度(下或上终板沉降最差处≥4mm)。采用多变量分析确定沉降的危险因素。

结果

共纳入 98 例患者(152 个节段)。73 个节段表现为轻度沉降(≤2mm),61 个节段表现为中度沉降(2-4mm),18 个节段表现为重度沉降(≥4mm)。多变量分析显示,严重沉降的危险因素包括过度切除椎体终板和较低的螺钉尖端与椎体高度比。严重沉降与假关节形成率增高相关(94.1%比 13.6%),但与再手术率增加无关。

结论

在 ACDF 中使用异体椎间融合器后,50%的椎间体会沉降>2mm,10%的椎间体会沉降>4mm。应减轻严重沉降的危险因素,以降低假关节形成的风险。

相似文献

1
Risk Factors for Allograft Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后移植物下沉的危险因素。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Feb;170:e700-e711. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.11.109. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
2
Titanium Cervical Cage Subsidence: Postoperative Computed Tomography Analysis Defining Incidence and Associated Risk Factors.钛质颈椎椎间融合器下沉:术后计算机断层扫描分析确定发生率及相关危险因素
Global Spine J. 2023 Sep;13(7):1703-1715. doi: 10.1177/21925682211046897. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
3
Endplate-specific fusion rate 1 year after surgery for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(ACDF).术后 2 年颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)后 1 年的终板融合率。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Dec;164(12):3173-3180. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05377-6. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
4
Fusion rate following three- and four-level ACDF using allograft and segmental instrumentation: A radiographic study.使用同种异体移植物和节段性内固定进行三节段和四节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的融合率:一项影像学研究。
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Apr;62:142-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.11.040. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
5
Pseudarthrosis rate following anterior cervical discectomy with fusion using an allograft cellular bone matrix: a multi-institutional analysis.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后使用同种异体细胞骨基质的假关节发生率:一项多机构分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Jun;50(6):E6. doi: 10.3171/2021.3.FOCUS2166.
6
A novel MRI-based Cervical-Endplate Bone Quality score independently predicts cage subsidence after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.一种基于磁共振成像的新型颈椎终板骨质量评分可独立预测颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后椎间融合器下沉。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2277-2286. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08250-5. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
7
Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.两种手术方式(两节段椎间盘切除术或单节段椎体次全切除术)治疗颈椎间盘疾病后颈椎融合的比较:矢状位曲度、颈椎前凸度、移植物塌陷及临近节段骨化。
Spine J. 2010 Mar;10(3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
8
MRI Vertebral Bone Quality Correlates With Interbody Cage Subsidence After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.MRI 椎体骨质量与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后椎间笼下沉相关。
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 May 1;37(4):149-154. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001623. Epub 2024 May 2.
9
Fusion and subsidence rates of vertebral body sliding osteotomy: Comparison of 3 reconstructive techniques for multilevel cervical myelopathy.椎体滑动截骨融合率:多节段颈椎病 3 种重建技术的比较。
Spine J. 2021 Jul;21(7):1089-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.023. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
10
What is the role of dynamic cervical spine radiographs in predicting pseudarthrosis revision following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?动态颈椎 X 光片在预测前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后假关节revision 中的作用是什么?
Spine J. 2022 Oct;22(10):1610-1621. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.04.020. Epub 2022 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Implant Subsidence and Its Impact on Cervical Alignment Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Study.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后植入物下沉的预测因素及其对颈椎排列的影响:一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 10;14(16):5660. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165660.
2
Lumbar Endplate Hounsfield Units Enhance Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Subsidence Prediction Compared to Trabecular Hounsfield Units Alone.与单独使用小梁骨Hounsfield单位相比,腰椎终板Hounsfield单位可增强经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术沉降预测能力。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jul 4:21925682251356986. doi: 10.1177/21925682251356986.
3
Comparison of Hybrid Surgery and Two-Level ACDF in Treating Consecutive Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
杂交手术与两级前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗连续性颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Global Spine J. 2025 May 20:21925682251343524. doi: 10.1177/21925682251343524.
4
Do Three-Dimensional Printed Porous Titanium Relative to Polyetheretherketone Interbody Cages Reduce Complications and Revisions after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?相对于聚醚醚酮椎间融合器,3D打印多孔钛椎间融合器能否减少经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后的并发症和翻修率?
Global Spine J. 2025 May 19:21925682251339998. doi: 10.1177/21925682251339998.
5
Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of postoperative outcomes.单侧与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定联合前路腰椎间融合术:术后结果比较。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Sep;33(9):3476-3483. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08412-5. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
6
Does Screw Number of Zero-profile Implants in Fusion Segment Influence Intervertebral Stability?零切迹椎间融合器螺钉数量是否影响椎间隙稳定性?
Orthop Surg. 2024 Oct;16(10):2355-2363. doi: 10.1111/os.14139. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
7
Are Variable Screw Angle Change and Screw-to-Vertebral Body Ratio Associated With Radiographic Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?可变螺钉角度变化和螺钉与椎体比例与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后影像学沉降有关吗?
Global Spine J. 2025 Apr;15(3):1582-1591. doi: 10.1177/21925682241252088. Epub 2024 May 5.
8
Overloaded vertebral body: a unique radiographic phenomenon following multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.椎体超负荷:颈椎前路多节段减压融合术后的一种独特影像学现象。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Nov 18;18(1):879. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04365-5.