Fluss Rose, Karandish Alireza, Della Croce Rebecca, Kirnaz Sertac, Ruiz Vanessa, De La Garza Ramos Rafael, Murthy Saikiran G, Yassari Reza, Gelfand Yaroslav
Leo M. Davidoff Department of Neurological Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 10;14(16):5660. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165660.
: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common procedure for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Limited research exists on the predictors of subsidence following ACDF. Subsidence can compromise surgical outcomes, alter alignment, and predispose patients to further complications, making it essential to prevent and understand it. This study aims to identify key risk factors for clinically significant subsidence and evaluate its impact on cervical alignment parameters in a large, diverse patient population. We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent ACDF between 2013 and 2022 at a single institution. Subsidence was calculated as the mean change in anterior and posterior disc height, with clinically significant subsidence being defined as three millimeters or more. Univariate analysis was followed by regression modeling to identify subsidence predictors and analyze patterns. Subgroup analyses stratified patients by implant type, number of levels fused, and cage material. : A total of 96 patients with 141 levels of ACDF met the inclusion criteria. Patients with significant subsidence were younger on average (52.44 vs. 55.94 years; = 0.074). Those with less postoperative lordosis were more likely to experience significant subsidence (79.5% vs. 90.2%; = 0.088). Patients with significant subsidence were more likely to have standalone implants (38.5% vs. 16.7%; < 0.01), taller cages (6.62 mm vs. 6.18 mm; < 0.05), and greater loss of segmental lordosis (7.33 degrees vs. 3.31 degrees; < 0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed that standalone implants were a significant independent predictor of subsidence (OR 2.679; < 0.05), and greater subsidence was positively associated with loss of segmental lordosis (OR 1.089; < 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed that multi-level procedures had a higher incidence of subsidence (35.7% vs. 28.1%; = 0.156), and PEEK cages demonstrated similar subsidence rates compared to titanium constructs (28.1% vs. 29.4%; = 0.897). : Standalone implants are the strongest independent predictor of significant subsidence, and those that experience subsidence also show greater loss of segmental lordosis, although not overall lordosis. These findings have implications for surgical planning, particularly in patients with borderline bone quality or requiring multi-level fusions. The results support the use of plated constructs in high-risk patients and emphasize the importance of individualized surgical planning based on patient-specific factors. Further research is needed to explore these findings and determine how they can be applied to improve ACDF outcomes.
前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)是治疗脊髓型颈椎病的常见手术。关于ACDF术后沉降预测因素的研究有限。沉降会影响手术效果、改变脊柱排列,并使患者更容易出现进一步的并发症,因此预防和了解沉降至关重要。本研究旨在确定具有临床意义的沉降的关键风险因素,并评估其对大量不同患者群体颈椎排列参数的影响。我们对2013年至2022年在单一机构接受ACDF手术的患者进行了回顾性研究。沉降计算为椎间盘前后高度的平均变化,具有临床意义的沉降定义为3毫米或以上。先进行单因素分析,然后进行回归建模以确定沉降预测因素并分析模式。亚组分析根据植入物类型、融合节段数量和椎间融合器材料对患者进行分层。共有96例患者的141个ACDF节段符合纳入标准。沉降明显的患者平均年龄较小(52.44岁对55.94岁;P = 0.074)。术后前凸减少的患者更有可能出现明显沉降(79.5%对90.2%;P = 0.088)。沉降明显的患者更有可能使用独立植入物(38.5%对16.7%;P < 0.01)、更高的椎间融合器(6.62毫米对6.18毫米;P < 0.05)以及节段性前凸丢失更多(7.33度对3.31度;P < 0.01)。多因素分析证实,独立植入物是沉降的重要独立预测因素(OR 2.679;P < 0.05),沉降增加与节段性前凸丢失呈正相关(OR 1.089;P < 0.01)。亚组分析显示,多节段手术的沉降发生率更高(35.7%对28.1%;P = 0.156),聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器与钛植入物的沉降率相似(28.1%对29.4%;P = 0.897)。独立植入物是明显沉降的最强独立预测因素,出现沉降的患者节段性前凸丢失也更多,尽管总体前凸无差异。这些发现对手术规划具有重要意义,特别是对于骨质质量临界或需要多节段融合的患者。结果支持在高危患者中使用带钢板的植入物,并强调基于患者特定因素进行个体化手术规划的重要性。需要进一步研究以探索这些发现,并确定如何应用它们来改善ACDF手术效果。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025-8-15
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025-6-25
World Neurosurg. 2023-2
Orthop Clin North Am. 2022-10
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023-4