• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗癌症干预措施成本效益阈值的确定。

Determination of a cost-effectiveness threshold for cancer interventions in Iran.

作者信息

Safari Hossein, Poder Thomas G, Afshari Somayeh, Nahvijou Azin, Arab-Zozani Morteza, Moradi Nasrin, Ameri Hosein

机构信息

Health Promotion Research Centre, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Management, Evaluation and Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 12;12:1039589. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1039589. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.1039589
PMID:36578935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9791211/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The estimation of a cost- Effectiveness (CE) threshold from the perspective of those who have experienced a life-threatening disease can provide empirical evidence for health policy makers to make the best allocation decisions on limited resources. The aim of the current study was to empirically determine the CE threshold for cancer interventions from the perspective of cancer patients in Iran.

METHODS

A composite time trade-off (cTTO) task for deriving quality adjusted life-year (QALY) and a double-bounded dichotomous choice (DBDC) approach followed by open-ended question for examining patients' willingness-to-pay were performed. A nationally representative sample of 580 cancer patients was recruited from the largest governmental cancer centers in Iran between June 2021 and January 2022, and data were gathered using face-to-face interviews. The CE threshold was calculated using the nonparametric Turnbull model and parametric interval-censored Weibull regression model. Furthermore, the factors that affect the CE threshold were determined using the parametric model.

RESULTS

The estimated CE threshold using the nonparametric Turnbull model and parametric interval-censored Weibull regression model was IRR 440,410,000 (USD 10,485.95) and IRR 595,280,000 (USD 14,173.33) per QALY, respectively. Gender, age, education, income, type of cancer, and current treatment status were significantly associated with the estimated CE threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

The value of parametric model-based threshold in this study was 1.98 times the Iranian GDP per capita, which was lower than the CE threshold value recommended by the WHO (i.e., 3 times the GDP per capita) for low-and middle-income countries.

摘要

背景与目的

从经历过危及生命疾病的人群角度估算成本效益(CE)阈值,可为卫生政策制定者在有限资源上做出最佳分配决策提供实证依据。本研究的目的是从伊朗癌症患者的角度实证确定癌症干预措施的CE阈值。

方法

采用用于推导质量调整生命年(QALY)的复合时间权衡(cTTO)任务以及双边界二分选择(DBDC)方法,随后通过开放式问题考察患者的支付意愿。2021年6月至2022年1月期间,从伊朗最大的政府癌症中心招募了580名具有全国代表性的癌症患者样本,并通过面对面访谈收集数据。使用非参数特恩布尔模型和参数区间删失威布尔回归模型计算CE阈值。此外,使用参数模型确定影响CE阈值的因素。

结果

使用非参数特恩布尔模型和参数区间删失威布尔回归模型估计的CE阈值分别为每QALY 440,410,000伊朗里亚尔(10,485.95美元)和595,280,000伊朗里亚尔(14,173.33美元)。性别、年龄、教育程度、收入、癌症类型和当前治疗状态与估计的CE阈值显著相关。

结论

本研究中基于参数模型的阈值价值是伊朗人均GDP的1.98倍,低于世界卫生组织为低收入和中等收入国家推荐的CE阈值(即人均GDP的3倍)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d16/9791211/53e421a618d2/fonc-12-1039589-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d16/9791211/53e421a618d2/fonc-12-1039589-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d16/9791211/53e421a618d2/fonc-12-1039589-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Determination of a cost-effectiveness threshold for cancer interventions in Iran.伊朗癌症干预措施成本效益阈值的确定。
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 12;12:1039589. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1039589. eCollection 2022.
2
Estimating the range of incremental cost-effectiveness thresholds for healthcare based on willingness to pay and GDP per capita: A systematic review.基于支付意愿和人均 GDP 估算医疗保健增量成本效益阈值范围:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0266934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266934. eCollection 2022.
3
Determination of Cost-Effectiveness Threshold for Health Care Interventions in Malaysia.马来西亚医疗保健干预措施成本效益阈值的确定。
Value Health. 2017 Sep;20(8):1131-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
4
Willingness to pay for one quality-adjusted life year in Iran.伊朗对一个质量调整生命年的支付意愿。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2019 Feb 28;17:4. doi: 10.1186/s12962-019-0172-9. eCollection 2019.
5
Value of willingness to pay for a QALY gained in Iran; a modified chained-approach.伊朗获得每质量调整生命年的支付意愿价值:一种修正的连锁方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 14;21(1):1339. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07344-w.
6
An exploratory study to estimate cost-effectiveness threshold value for life saving treatments in western Iran.一项关于估计伊朗西部挽救生命治疗的成本效益阈值的探索性研究。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Oct 23;18:47. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00241-9. eCollection 2020.
7
Monetary Value of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) among Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: a Willingness to Pay Study (WTP).心血管疾病患者质量调整生命年(QALY)的货币价值:一项支付意愿研究(WTP)
Iran J Pharm Res. 2017 Spring;16(2):823-833.
8
The Worth of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in Patients with Diabetes: An Investigation Study using a Willingness-to-Pay Method.糖尿病患者中质量调整生命年的价值:一项使用支付意愿法的调查研究。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Sep;3(3):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s41669-018-0111-2.
9
Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: a systematic review with meta-regression.支付意愿以获得质量调整生命年:系统综述和荟萃回归分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Mar;23(2):277-299. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01364-3. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of Care Environments for Improving the Mental Health of Orphaned and Separated Children and Adolescents in Kenya.肯尼亚改善孤儿及与家人离散儿童和青少年心理健康的护理环境的成本效益
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2021 Jun 1;24(2):31-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic evaluation of hypertension screening in Iran using a Markov model.使用马尔可夫模型对伊朗高血压筛查进行的经济评估。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 22;20(7):e0303223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303223. eCollection 2025.
2
A Scoping Review of 20 Years Breast Cancer Screening Programs in Iran.伊朗20年乳腺癌筛查项目的范围综述
Iran J Public Health. 2025 Jan;54(1):88-100. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v54i1.17577.
3
Valuing the SF-6Dv2 in the capital of Iran using a discrete choice experiment with duration.使用具有持续时间的离散选择实验来评估伊朗首都的 SF-6Dv2。

本文引用的文献

1
Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: a systematic review with meta-regression.支付意愿以获得质量调整生命年:系统综述和荟萃回归分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Mar;23(2):277-299. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01364-3. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
2
Cancer in Iran 2008 to 2025: Recent incidence trends and short-term predictions of the future burden.伊朗癌症发病情况 2008 年至 2025 年:近期发病趋势和未来负担的短期预测。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Aug 1;149(3):594-605. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33574. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
3
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.
Qual Life Res. 2024 Jul;33(7):1853-1863. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03649-5. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
4
An Exploratory Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of a Multi-cancer Early Detection Blood Test Compared with Standard of Care Screening in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省多癌种早期检测血液检测与标准护理筛查的成本效益探索性分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Apr;42(4):393-407. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01345-9. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
5
A national survey of Iranian general population to estimate a value set for the EQ-5D-5L.一项针对伊朗普通人群的全国性调查,旨在估算 EQ-5D-5L 的效价值。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Jul;32(7):2079-2087. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03378-1. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
Mapping QLQ-C30 Onto EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D-V2 in Patients With Colorectal and Breast Cancer From a Developing Country.在发展中国家的结直肠癌和乳腺癌患者中,将 QLQ-C30 映射到 EQ-5D-5L 和 SF-6D-V2。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2021 May;24:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.06.006. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
5
Interim value set for the EQ-5D-5L in Iran using the Crosswalk method.采用交叉法为伊朗的EQ-5D-5L设定的临时值集。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Sep 15;34:121. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.121. eCollection 2020.
6
Mapping the cancer-specific FACT-B onto the generic SF-6Dv2.将癌症特异性 FACT-B 映射到通用 SF-6Dv2 上。
Breast Cancer. 2021 Jan;28(1):130-136. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01141-9. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
7
Empirical Monetary Valuation of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Willingness-to-Pay Analysis.沙特阿拉伯王国质量调整生命年的实证货币估值:支付意愿分析。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2020 Dec;4(4):625-633. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00211-0.
8
Willingness to pay for one quality-adjusted life year in Iran.伊朗对一个质量调整生命年的支付意愿。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2019 Feb 28;17:4. doi: 10.1186/s12962-019-0172-9. eCollection 2019.
9
The Worth of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in Patients with Diabetes: An Investigation Study using a Willingness-to-Pay Method.糖尿病患者中质量调整生命年的价值:一项使用支付意愿法的调查研究。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Sep;3(3):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s41669-018-0111-2.
10
Willingness-to-Pay for One Quality-Adjusted Life-Year: A Population-Based Study from Iran.支付意愿一质量调整生命年:来自伊朗的一项基于人群的研究。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Dec;16(6):837-846. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0424-4.