• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进化能力和性状功能预测植物种群表型的分歧。

Evolvability and trait function predict phenotypic divergence of plant populations.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Biodiversity Unit, Lund University, Lund 223 62, Sweden.

School of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, UK.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 3;120(1):e2203228120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2203228120. Epub 2022 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2203228120
PMID:36580593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9910613/
Abstract

Understanding the causes and limits of population divergence in phenotypic traits is a fundamental aim of evolutionary biology, with the potential to yield predictions of adaptation to environmental change. Reciprocal transplant experiments and the evaluation of optimality models suggest that local adaptation is common but not universal, and some studies suggest that trait divergence is highly constrained by genetic variances and covariances of complex phenotypes. We analyze a large database of population divergence in plants and evaluate whether evolutionary divergence scales positively with standing genetic variation within populations (evolvability), as expected if genetic constraints are evolutionarily important. We further evaluate differences in divergence and evolvability-divergence relationships between reproductive and vegetative traits and between selfing, mixed-mating, and outcrossing species, as these factors are expected to influence both patterns of selection and evolutionary potentials. Evolutionary divergence scaled positively with evolvability. Furthermore, trait divergence was greater for vegetative traits than for floral (reproductive) traits, but largely independent of the mating system. Jointly, these factors explained ~40% of the variance in evolutionary divergence. The consistency of the evolvability-divergence relationships across diverse species suggests substantial predictability of trait divergence. The results are also consistent with genetic constraints playing a role in evolutionary divergence.

摘要

了解表型特征的种群分歧的原因和限制是进化生物学的一个基本目标,它有可能预测对环境变化的适应。相互移植实验和最优模型的评估表明,局部适应很常见,但不是普遍的,一些研究表明,复杂表型的遗传方差和协方差高度限制了性状分歧。我们分析了一个关于植物种群分歧的大型数据库,并评估了进化分歧是否与种群内的遗传变异(可进化性)呈正相关,如果遗传限制在进化上很重要,这是可以预期的。我们进一步评估了有性生殖和无性生殖特征之间、自交、混合交配和异交物种之间的分歧和可进化性-分歧关系的差异,因为这些因素预计会影响选择模式和进化潜力。进化分歧与可进化性呈正相关。此外,与花(生殖)特征相比,无性繁殖特征的分歧更大,但与交配系统基本无关。这些因素共同解释了进化分歧方差的~40%。不同物种之间可进化性-分歧关系的一致性表明性状分歧具有相当大的可预测性。结果也与遗传限制在进化分歧中发挥作用的观点一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a638/9910613/36abc8055fdd/pnas.2203228120fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a638/9910613/2297cf1244b3/pnas.2203228120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a638/9910613/b5def0457ae8/pnas.2203228120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a638/9910613/acebe7aea075/pnas.2203228120fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a638/9910613/8eabe3dc1a8f/pnas.2203228120fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a638/9910613/36abc8055fdd/pnas.2203228120fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a638/9910613/2297cf1244b3/pnas.2203228120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a638/9910613/b5def0457ae8/pnas.2203228120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a638/9910613/acebe7aea075/pnas.2203228120fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a638/9910613/8eabe3dc1a8f/pnas.2203228120fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a638/9910613/36abc8055fdd/pnas.2203228120fig05.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolvability and trait function predict phenotypic divergence of plant populations.进化能力和性状功能预测植物种群表型的分歧。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 3;120(1):e2203228120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2203228120. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
2
The evolvability of animal-pollinated flowers: towards predicting adaptation to novel pollinator communities.动物传粉花的可进化性:预测对新的传粉者群落的适应。
New Phytol. 2019 Jan;221(2):1128-1135. doi: 10.1111/nph.15403. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
3
The evolvability of herkogamy: Quantifying the evolutionary potential of a composite trait.雌雄异位的可进化性:量化复合性状的进化潜力。
Evolution. 2017 Jun;71(6):1572-1586. doi: 10.1111/evo.13258. Epub 2017 May 18.
4
How early does the selfing syndrome arise? Associations between selfing ability and flower size within populations of the mixed-mater Collinsia verna.自交综合征出现得有多早?混生型琉璃繁缕种群内自交能力与花大小的关系。
Am J Bot. 2022 Feb;109(2):333-344. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1804. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
5
Genetic constraints predict evolutionary divergence in Dalechampia blossoms.遗传限制预示着南美香脂花的进化分歧。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 19;369(1649):20130255. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0255.
6
Minor quantitative trait loci underlie floral traits associated with mating system divergence in Mimulus.微小数量性状基因座是与沟酸浆属植物交配系统分化相关的花部性状的基础。
Evolution. 2002 Nov;56(11):2138-55. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00139.x.
7
Evolvability and constraint in the evolution of three-dimensional flower morphology.三维花形态进化中的可进化性和约束。
Am J Bot. 2022 Nov;109(11):1906-1917. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.16092. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
8
Evolvability and genetic constraint in Dalechampia blossoms: components of variance and measures of evolvability.南美鼠尾草属花朵的可进化性与遗传限制:方差成分与可进化性度量
J Evol Biol. 2003 Jul;16(4):754-66. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00556.x.
9
Axes of multivariate sexual signal divergence among incipient species: Concordance with selection, genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity.初现种间多维性信号分歧的轴:与选择、遗传变异和表型可塑性的一致性。
J Evol Biol. 2022 Jan;35(1):109-123. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13951. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
10
The potential for evolutionary rescue in an Arctic seashore plant threatened by climate change.气候变化威胁下的北极海滨植物的进化拯救潜力。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Oct;291(2032):20241351. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1351. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Developmental lines of least resistance predict standing genetic covariation but do not constrain plasticity or rapid evolution.发育过程中的最小阻力线预测了静态遗传协方差,但并不限制可塑性或快速进化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Sep;292(2054):20251039. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.1039. Epub 2025 Sep 3.
2
Leveraging genetic resources and genomic prediction to enhance flavonol content in cranberry fruit.利用遗传资源和基因组预测提高蔓越莓果实中的黄酮醇含量。
Plant Genome. 2025 Sep;18(3):e70074. doi: 10.1002/tpg2.70074.
3
Phenotypic Diversity Analysis and Integrative Evaluation of Germplasm Resources in Ya'an, Sichuan Province.

本文引用的文献

1
Phenotypic plasticity masks range-wide genetic differentiation for vegetative but not reproductive traits in a short-lived plant.表型可塑性掩盖了短命植物在营养生长而非生殖生长性状上的广泛遗传分化。
Ecol Lett. 2021 Nov;24(11):2378-2393. doi: 10.1111/ele.13858. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
2
Genetics of quantitative traits with dominance under stabilizing and directional selection in partially selfing species.具有显性的数量性状的遗传学在部分自交物种中的稳定和定向选择下。
Evolution. 2021 Aug;75(8):1920-1935. doi: 10.1111/evo.14304. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
3
Natural selection mediated by seasonal time constraints increases the alignment between evolvability and developmental plasticity.
四川省雅安市种质资源的表型多样性分析与综合评价
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jul 21;14(14):2249. doi: 10.3390/plants14142249.
4
Conserved wing shape variation across biological scales unveils dialectical relationships between micro- and macroevolution.跨生物尺度的保守翅形变异揭示了微观和宏观进化之间的辩证关系。
Commun Biol. 2025 Jul 7;8(1):990. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08376-2.
5
Alternative Mutational Architectures Producing Identical M-Matrices can Lead to Different Patterns of Evolutionary Divergence.产生相同M矩阵的替代突变结构可导致不同的进化分歧模式。
Genome Biol Evol. 2025 May 30;17(6). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evaf099.
6
Neutral transcriptome rewiring promotes quantitative disease resistance evolvability at the species level.中性转录组重排促进物种水平上的定量抗病性进化潜力。
Plant Cell. 2025 Jun 4;37(6). doi: 10.1093/plcell/koaf105.
7
Macroevolution along developmental lines of least resistance in fly wings.果蝇翅膀沿阻力最小发育路线的宏观进化。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Apr;9(4):639-651. doi: 10.1038/s41559-025-02639-1. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
8
Reviving collapsed plant-pollinator networks from a single species.从单一物种恢复崩溃的植物-传粉者网络。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Oct 4;22(10):e3002826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002826. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
The potential for evolutionary rescue in an Arctic seashore plant threatened by climate change.气候变化威胁下的北极海滨植物的进化拯救潜力。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Oct;291(2032):20241351. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1351. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
10
Evolution of "invasion syndrome" in invasive goldenrod is not constrained by genetic trade-offs.入侵性一枝黄花“入侵综合征”的进化不受基因权衡的限制。
Evol Appl. 2024 Jun 28;17(7):e13734. doi: 10.1111/eva.13734. eCollection 2024 Jul.
季节时间限制介导的自然选择增加了可进化性和发育可塑性之间的一致性。
Evolution. 2021 Feb;75(2):464-475. doi: 10.1111/evo.14147. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Using ecological context to interpret spatiotemporal variation in natural selection.利用生态背景来解释自然选择的时空变化。
Evolution. 2021 Feb;75(2):294-309. doi: 10.1111/evo.14136. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
5
Plasticity leaves a phenotypic signature during local adaptation.可塑性在局部适应过程中留下了表型印记。
Evol Lett. 2020 Jun 9;4(4):360-370. doi: 10.1002/evl3.185. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Fly wing evolution explained by a neutral model with mutational pleiotropy.具有突变多效性的中性模型解释飞翼的进化。
Evolution. 2020 Sep;74(9):2158-2167. doi: 10.1111/evo.14076. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
7
Global patterns of population genetic differentiation in seed plants.种子植物群体遗传分化的全球模式。
Mol Ecol. 2020 Sep;29(18):3413-3428. doi: 10.1111/mec.15575. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
8
Towards the flower economics spectrum.走向花卉经济光谱。
New Phytol. 2021 Jan;229(2):665-672. doi: 10.1111/nph.16823. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
The relative importance of plasticity versus genetic differentiation in explaining between population differences; a meta-analysis.探讨在解释种群间差异时,可塑性与遗传分化的相对重要性:一项荟萃分析。
Ecol Lett. 2020 Oct;23(10):1432-1441. doi: 10.1111/ele.13565. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
10
Phenotypic selection mosaic for flower length influenced by geographically varying hawkmoth pollinator proboscis length and abiotic environment.花长表型选择镶嵌受地理上变化的天蛾传粉者喙长和非生物环境影响。
New Phytol. 2020 Jan;225(2):985-998. doi: 10.1111/nph.16192. Epub 2019 Oct 30.