• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与年轻年龄组相比,70岁及以上患者行微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的疗效改善情况。

Improvement following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients aged 70 years or older compared with younger age groups.

作者信息

Shahi Pratyush, Dalal Sidhant, Shinn Daniel, Song Junho, Araghi Kasra, Melissaridou Dimitra, Sheha Evan, Dowdell James, Iyer Sravisht, Qureshi Sheeraz A

机构信息

1Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and.

2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jan;54(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.FOCUS22604.

DOI:10.3171/2022.10.FOCUS22604
PMID:36587410
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to assess the outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) in patients ≥ 70 years old and compare them to younger age groups.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of data that were collected prospectively. Patients who underwent primary single-level MI-TLIF were included and divided into 3 groups: age < 60, 60-69, and ≥ 70 years. The outcome measures were as follows: 1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (i.e., visual analog scale [VAS] for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary [SF-12 PCS]); 2) minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement; 3) return to activities; 4) opioid discontinuation; 5) fusion rates; and 6) complications/reoperations.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients (age < 60 years, 62; 60-69 years, 47; ≥ 70 years, 38) were included. All the groups showed significant improvements in all PROMs at the early (< 6 months) and late (≥ 6 months) time points and there was no significant difference between the groups. Although MCID achievement rates for VAS leg and ODI were similar, they were lower in the ≥ 70-year-old patient group for VAS back and SF-12 PCS. Although the time to MCID achievement for ODI and SF-12 PCS was similar, it was greater in the ≥ 70-year-old patient group for VAS back and leg. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of return to activities, opioid discontinuation, fusion rates, and complication/reoperation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients > 70 years of age may be less likely and/or take longer to achieve MCID compared to their younger counterparts, they show an overall significant improvement in PROMs, a similar likelihood of returning to activities and discontinuing opioids, and comparable fusion and complication/reoperation rates following MI-TLIF.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估70岁及以上患者行微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF)的疗效,并与较年轻年龄组进行比较。

方法

这是一项对前瞻性收集的数据进行的回顾性研究。纳入接受初次单节段MI-TLIF的患者,并将其分为3组:年龄<60岁、60 - 69岁和≥70岁。结局指标如下:1)患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)(即背部和腿部疼痛的视觉模拟量表[VAS]、Oswestry功能障碍指数[ODI]、12项简短健康调查问卷身体成分总结[SF-12 PCS]);2)最小临床重要差异(MCID)达成情况;3)恢复活动情况;4)停用阿片类药物情况;5)融合率;6)并发症/再次手术情况。

结果

共纳入147例患者(年龄<60岁,62例;60 - 69岁,47例;≥70岁,38例)。所有组在早期(<6个月)和晚期(≥6个月)时间点的所有PROMs均有显著改善,且组间无显著差异。虽然VAS腿部疼痛和ODI的MCID达成率相似,但≥70岁患者组的VAS背部疼痛和SF-12 PCS的MCID达成率较低。虽然ODI和SF-12 PCS达到MCID的时间相似,但≥70岁患者组的VAS背部和腿部疼痛达到MCID的时间更长。各组在恢复活动、停用阿片类药物、融合率以及并发症/再次手术率方面无显著差异。

结论

尽管70岁以上患者与较年轻患者相比可能较难且/或需要更长时间达到MCID,但他们在PROMs方面总体有显著改善,恢复活动和停用阿片类药物的可能性相似,且MI-TLIF术后的融合率以及并发症/再次手术率相当。

相似文献

1
Improvement following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients aged 70 years or older compared with younger age groups.与年轻年龄组相比,70岁及以上患者行微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的疗效改善情况。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jan;54(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.FOCUS22604.
2
Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.微创腰椎手术常见问题的实用解答。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.087. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
3
The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Leg Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement, and Patient Satisfaction After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.术前腿部疼痛严重程度对微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后患者报告结局、最小临床重要差异实现和患者满意度的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e1196-e1207. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
4
The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.术前残疾严重程度对微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后患者报告结局及患者满意度的影响
World Neurosurg. 2022 Mar;159:e334-e346. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.051. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
5
Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.L5/S1 节段单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与前路腰椎体间融合联合后路内固定术的比较
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jan;157:e111-e122. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.108. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
6
Influence of Preoperative 12-Item Short Form Mental Composite Score on Clinical Outcomes in an Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Population Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.术前 12 项简短心理综合评分对微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗峡部裂性腰椎滑脱患者临床结局的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Feb;158:e1022-e1030. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.026. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
7
Do preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics impact patient outcomes following one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based upon presenting symptoms?基于患者的主要症状,术前的临床和影像学特征是否会影响单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术患者的预后?
Spine J. 2022 Apr;22(4):570-577. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
8
Impact of Advanced Age on Postoperative Outcomes Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.高龄对经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后术后结果的影响。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Sep 1;29(17):e869-e879. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01382.
9
Impact of Ambulatory Setting for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing One-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Review of the Literature.门诊环境对行单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的工人赔偿患者的影响及文献复习。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e251-e267. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.136. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
10
Improvement in predominant back pain following minimally invasive decompression for spinal stenosis.经微创减压治疗后,腰椎狭窄症患者的主要腰痛得到改善。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Jul 14;39(4):576-582. doi: 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23278. Print 2023 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Decompression Alone Versus Fusion for Predominant Back Pain.单纯微创减压与融合治疗以背痛为主的疗效比较
HSS J. 2025 Feb;21(1):42-48. doi: 10.1177/15563316231223503. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
2
Impact of age on comparative outcomes of decompression alone versus fusion for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis.年龄对 L4 退变性脊椎滑脱单纯减压与融合手术比较结果的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Oct;33(10):3749-3759. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08336-0. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
3
Floor-Mounted Robotic Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 1,050 Screws.
腰椎手术中地面安装式机器人椎弓根螺钉置入:1050枚螺钉的分析
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):577-586. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346070.035. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
4
Venous Thromboembolism Rates Have Not Decreased in Elective Lumbar Fusion Surgery from 2011 to 2020.2011年至2020年期间,择期腰椎融合手术的静脉血栓栓塞发生率并未下降。
Global Spine J. 2024 Nov;14(8):2270-2278. doi: 10.1177/21925682231173642. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
5
Poor muscle health and low preoperative ODI are independent predictors for slower achievement of MCID after minimally invasive decompression.肌肉健康状况差和术前 ODI 低是微创减压后达到 MCID 较慢的独立预测因素。
Spine J. 2023 Aug;23(8):1152-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 Apr 12.