• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用超快超声成像技术对高血压前期人群的颈动脉僵硬度进行量化分析。

Quantifying carotid stiffness in a pre-hypertensive population with ultrafast ultrasound imaging.

作者信息

Ma Xuehui, Zhu Zhengqiu, Wang Yinping, Shen Bixiao, Jiang Xuezhong, Liu Wenjun, Wu Yiyun, Zou Chong, Luan Yun, Gao Hui, Huang Hui

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.

Department of Ultrasound, Jiangsu Province Geriatric Hospital, Geriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Ultrasonography. 2023 Jan;42(1):89-99. doi: 10.14366/usg.22039. Epub 2022 Jul 9.

DOI:10.14366/usg.22039
PMID:36588181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9816694/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess carotid stiffening in a pre-hypertensive (PHT) population using ultrafast pulse wave velocity (ufPWV).

METHODS

This study retrospectively enrolled 626 individuals who underwent clinical interviews, serum tests, and assessments of the systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), pulse wave velocity-beginning of systole (PWV-BS), and pulse wave velocity-end of systole (PWV-ES) between January 2017 and December 2021. The patients were divided into three groups according to their blood pressure (BP)-normal BP (NBP): SBP <130 mmHg and DBP <80 mmHg (n=215); PHT: 130 mmHg≤SBP<140 mmHg and/or 80 mmHg≤DBP<90 mmHg (n=119); hypertensive (HT): SBP ≥140 mmHg and/or DBP ≥90 mmHg (n=292). Correlation analyses and comparisons were performed among the groups and in the cIMT subgroups (cIMT ≥0.050 cm and <0.050 cm).

RESULTS

cIMT and PWV-ES significantly differed among the BP groups (P<0.05). The BP groups had similar PWV-BS when cIMT <0.050 cm or cIMT ≥0.050 cm (all P>0.05). However, the NBP group had a notably lower PWV-ES than the PHT (P<0.001 and P=0.024) and HT (all P<0.001) groups in both cIMT categories, while the PWV-ES in the PHT group were not significantly lower than in the HT group (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Carotid morphological and biomechanical properties in the PHT group differed from those in the NBP group. ufPWV could be used for an early evaluation of carotid stiffening linked to pre-hypertension.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用超快速脉搏波速度(ufPWV)评估高血压前期(PHT)人群的颈动脉僵硬度。

方法

本研究回顾性纳入了626名在2017年1月至2021年12月期间接受临床访谈、血清检测以及收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT)、收缩期开始时脉搏波速度(PWV-BS)和收缩期末脉搏波速度(PWV-ES)评估的个体。根据血压将患者分为三组——正常血压(NBP):SBP<130 mmHg且DBP<80 mmHg(n = 215);高血压前期(PHT):130 mmHg≤SBP<140 mmHg和/或80 mmHg≤DBP<90 mmHg(n = 119);高血压(HT):SBP≥140 mmHg和/或DBP≥90 mmHg(n = 292)。在各组之间以及cIMT亚组(cIMT≥0.050 cm和<0.050 cm)中进行相关性分析和比较。

结果

BP组之间的cIMT和PWV-ES存在显著差异(P<0.05)。当cIMT<0.050 cm或cIMT≥0.050 cm时,BP组的PWV-BS相似(所有P>0.05)。然而,在两个cIMT类别中,NBP组的PWV-ES均显著低于PHT组(P<0.001和P = 0.024)和HT组(所有P<0.001),而PHT组的PWV-ES并不显著低于HT组(所有P>0.05)。

结论

PHT组的颈动脉形态和生物力学特性与NBP组不同。ufPWV可用于早期评估与高血压前期相关的颈动脉僵硬度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9816694/36f6020552d3/usg-22039f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9816694/720ac6f9d79e/usg-22039f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9816694/0cc989ce7321/usg-22039f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9816694/e8ffc9f10fb2/usg-22039f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9816694/2f2e5643f468/usg-22039f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9816694/36f6020552d3/usg-22039f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9816694/720ac6f9d79e/usg-22039f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9816694/0cc989ce7321/usg-22039f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9816694/e8ffc9f10fb2/usg-22039f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9816694/2f2e5643f468/usg-22039f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9816694/36f6020552d3/usg-22039f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying carotid stiffness in a pre-hypertensive population with ultrafast ultrasound imaging.利用超快超声成像技术对高血压前期人群的颈动脉僵硬度进行量化分析。
Ultrasonography. 2023 Jan;42(1):89-99. doi: 10.14366/usg.22039. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
2
Carotid stiffness and atherosclerotic risk: non-invasive quantification with ultrafast ultrasound pulse wave velocity.颈动脉僵硬度与动脉粥样硬化风险:应用超快超声脉搏波速度进行无创定量评估。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Mar;29(3):1507-1517. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5705-7. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
3
Predicting cardiovascular risk stratification in apparently healthy population by using noninvasive ultrafast ultrasound imaging.应用无创超快超声成像技术预测貌似健康人群的心血管风险分层。
Acad Radiol. 2024 Oct;31(10):3944-3955. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.05.011. Epub 2024 May 29.
4
Carotid stiffening predicts cardiovascular risk stratification in mid-life: non-invasive quantification with ultrafast ultrasound imaging.颈动脉僵硬度可预测中年人群的心血管风险分层:基于超快超声成像的非侵入性量化分析
Ultrasonography. 2022 Jul;41(3):462-472. doi: 10.14366/usg.21197. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
5
Quantifying carotid stiffness in chronic kidney disease using ultrafast ultrasound imaging.使用超快超声成像技术量化慢性肾脏病患者的颈动脉僵硬度。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):75-85. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-503. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
6
Evaluation of Carotid Stiffness in Metabolic Syndrome by Real-Time Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging and Ultrafast Pulse Wave Velocity.应用实时剪切波弹性成像和超快脉搏波速度评估代谢综合征患者的颈动脉僵硬度。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2024 Aug;50(8):1280-1286. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.05.007. Epub 2024 May 27.
7
Individualized References of Carotid Stiffening Quantified With Ultrafast Ultrasound Imaging: Model Construction and Preliminary Validation.基于超快超声成像的颈动脉僵硬度个体化参考值:模型构建与初步验证。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022 Aug;48(8):1528-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.03.017. Epub 2022 May 18.
8
Relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and carotid artery stiffness assessed by ultrafast ultrasound imaging in patients with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者应用超快超声成像技术评估颈动脉内中膜厚度与颈动脉僵硬度的关系。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Feb;111:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.12.016. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
9
Clinical application value of Ultrafast Pulse Wave Velocity in early cardiovascular injury of Immunoglobulin A nephropathy.超快速脉搏波速度在免疫球蛋白 A 肾病早期心血管损伤中的临床应用价值。
Med Ultrason. 2024 Mar 27;26(1):15-20. doi: 10.11152/mu-4319. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
10
Measurement of carotid pulse wave velocity using ultrafast ultrasound imaging in hypertensive patients.在高血压患者中使用超快超声成像测量颈动脉脉搏波速度。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2017 Apr;44(2):183-190. doi: 10.1007/s10396-016-0755-4. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of cardiovascular risks and carotid stiffening at ultrafast ultrasound imaging in young populations.年轻人群中超快超声成像下心血管风险与颈动脉僵硬度的关联
Eur Radiol. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11979-2.
2
Evaluation of carotid artery elasticity and its influencing factors in non-obese PCOS patients using a technique for quantitative vascular elasticity measurement.应用定量血管弹性测量技术评价非肥胖型多囊卵巢综合征患者颈动脉弹性及其影响因素。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 9;15:1374718. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1374718. eCollection 2024.
3
Arterial stiffness in subclinical atherosclerosis quantified with ultrafast pulse wave velocity measurements: a comparison with a healthy population using propensity score matching.

本文引用的文献

1
Carotid stiffening predicts cardiovascular risk stratification in mid-life: non-invasive quantification with ultrafast ultrasound imaging.颈动脉僵硬度可预测中年人群的心血管风险分层:基于超快超声成像的非侵入性量化分析
Ultrasonography. 2022 Jul;41(3):462-472. doi: 10.14366/usg.21197. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
2
Absent atherosclerotic risk factors are associated with carotid stiffening quantified with ultrafast ultrasound imaging.无动脉粥样硬化风险因素与应用超快超声成像技术定量评估的颈动脉僵硬度增加有关。
Eur Radiol. 2021 May;31(5):3195-3206. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07405-4. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
3
Ageing and atherosclerosis: vascular intrinsic and extrinsic factors and potential role of IL-6.
通过超快速脉搏波速度测量对亚临床动脉粥样硬化中的动脉僵硬度进行量化:与使用倾向评分匹配的健康人群进行比较。
Ultrasonography. 2024 Jul;43(4):263-271. doi: 10.14366/usg.24045. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
4
Quantifying carotid stiffness in chronic kidney disease using ultrafast ultrasound imaging.使用超快超声成像技术量化慢性肾脏病患者的颈动脉僵硬度。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):75-85. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-503. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
衰老与动脉粥样硬化:血管的内在和外在因素及 IL-6 的潜在作用。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Jan;18(1):58-68. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0431-7. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
4
Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Progression as Surrogate Marker for Cardiovascular Risk: Meta-Analysis of 119 Clinical Trials Involving 100 667 Patients.颈动脉内中膜厚度进展作为心血管风险的替代标志物:涉及 100667 名患者的 119 项临床试验的荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Aug 18;142(7):621-642. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046361. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
5
Establishing normal reference value of carotid ultrafast pulse wave velocity and evaluating changes on coronary slow flow.建立颈动脉超快速脉搏波速度的正常参考值,并评估其对冠状动脉慢血流的变化。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Oct;36(10):1931-1939. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01908-3. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
6
Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and the Risk of First Stroke in Patients With Hypertension.颈动脉内膜中层厚度与高血压患者首发脑卒中的风险。
Stroke. 2020 Feb;51(2):379-386. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026587. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
7
The association between carotid intima-media thickness and new-onset hypertension in a Chinese community-based population.颈动脉内膜中层厚度与中国社区人群新发高血压的关系。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1266-1.
8
Modifiable risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in 155 722 individuals from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study.在来自 21 个高收入、中等收入和低收入国家(PURE)的 155722 人中,可改变的风险因素、心血管疾病和死亡率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 7;395(10226):795-808. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32008-2. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
9
ACC/AHA Versus ESC/ESH on Hypertension Guidelines: JACC Guideline Comparison.ACC/AHA 与 ESC/ESH 高血压指南比较:JACC 指南比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 18;73(23):3018-3026. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.507.
10
Long-Term Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter and Hypertension Incidence in China.长期暴露于细颗粒物与中国高血压发病率。
Hypertension. 2019 Jun;73(6):1195-1201. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12666.