School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 2nd Propedeutic Department of Surgery, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece;
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2022 Jul-Sep;63(3):491-502. doi: 10.47162/RJME.63.3.03.
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) account for approximately 35% of all cystic tumors in the pancreas and represent the largest subgroup. They are characterized by mucin production and intraductal papillary epithelium growth. IPMNs range from benign to malignant lesions. Biomarkers combined with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) is the best diagnostic tool. The risk of malignant transformation for main-duct IPMNs is between 34-68% and for low-risk branch-duct (BD)-IPMNs it is 1.1%. Monitoring is crucial for determining the optimal time of surgical excision. Novel artificial intelligence combining clinical, tumor biomarkers, imaging and molecular genomics plays a determinant role in the evaluation of such lesions. The first diagnostic tool is multidetector helical computed tomography (MDHCT) or up-to-date magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI detects malignancy by enhancing mural nodules ≥3 mm. Novel endosonographic interventional techniques have been added to the diagnostic armamentarium. Pancreatoscopy is feasible and effective but challenging for evaluating the diagnosis, invasiveness, and extent of IPMNs. Its findings may change the surgical approach. Pancreatic juice and duodenal fluid have been used recently for molecular biological analysis. The genes most frequently altered include Kirsten rat sarcoma viral proto-oncogene (KRAS), tumor protein p53 (TP53), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4), and guanine nucleotide-binding protein, alpha stimulating (GNAS). Despite the advances in diagnostic modalities, assessment of this premalignant lesion of pancreatic cancer, with its poor prognosis, is a challenging task. Pancreatectomy is the indicated approach for malignant or high-risk IPMNs with potent malignancy. Conservative management or enucleation for preserving the pancreas of low-risk BD-IPMNs is recommended, but long-term follow-up for recurrence is necessary. The management of IPMNs must be individualized based on preoperative high-risk stigmata and worrisome features.
胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMNs)约占所有胰腺囊性肿瘤的 35%,是最大的亚组。它们的特征是黏液产生和导管内乳头状上皮生长。IPMNs 从良性到恶性病变不等。生物标志物结合 18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(18FDG-PET)是最佳的诊断工具。主胰管 IPMN 的恶性转化风险为 34-68%,低风险分支胰管(BD)-IPMN 的风险为 1.1%。监测对于确定手术切除的最佳时机至关重要。结合临床、肿瘤标志物、成像和分子基因组学的新型人工智能在评估此类病变中起着决定性作用。第一个诊断工具是多排螺旋 CT(MDHCT)或最新的磁共振成像(MRI)。MRI 通过增强≥3mm 的壁结节来检测恶性肿瘤。新型内镜下介入技术已被添加到诊断工具中。胰腺镜检查是可行且有效的,但评估 IPMNs 的诊断、侵袭性和程度具有挑战性。其发现可能会改变手术方法。胰液和十二指肠液最近已用于分子生物学分析。最常改变的基因包括 Kirsten 大鼠肉瘤病毒原癌基因(KRAS)、肿瘤蛋白 p53(TP53)、细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶抑制剂 2A(CDKN2A)、SMAD 家族成员 4(SMAD4)和鸟苷酸结合蛋白,α 刺激(GNAS)。尽管诊断方式有所进步,但评估这种具有不良预后的胰腺癌前体恶性病变仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务。胰腺切除术是恶性或高危 IPMNs 的指征,具有很强的恶性潜力。对于低风险 BD-IPMNs,建议保留胰腺的保守治疗或摘除法,但需要长期随访以防止复发。必须根据术前高危特征和令人担忧的特征对 IPMNs 进行个体化管理。